Background: On October 11th, 2007, Michael Dupree broke into a van parked near a shop on Martin Luther King Blvd. and stole a bike. The owner of the van, Anthony McKoy, who also owns the shop, saw the broken window on his vehicle and observed Dupree trying to sell the bike. With the assistance of two other citizens, McKoy detained Dupree until police arrived. Dupree was arrested, convicted of burglary and cocaine possession in 2008, and is now serving a 12-year sentence at the Apalachee Correctional Institution in Sneads.

Now Dupree has filed a $500,000 lawsuit against McKoy and the other two citizens who detained him. He claims McKoy and the other men jumped him, pointed a gun at him, placed a knee painfully on his spine and handcuffed him. Dupree also claims in his suit, which he filed without a lawyer, that the take-down “resulted in permanent disabilities and psychological disorders which the Plaintiff continues to suffer.”

McKoy couldn’t believe it when he was served with Dupree’s lawsuit earlier in July, but expects the suit to be dismissed without a formal trial. The race of McKoy and the other two defendants has not been publicly disclosed.

Seeing that social critiques are capable of dissolving a society within a small amount of time, it is necessary to take them very seriously. Any future society which intends to exist will have to develop a protocol to protect itself from acts of intellectual warfare while stilll remaining adaptable and exploring new ideas. This implies a new seriousness in dealing with critiques which are voiced across EGI boundaries – critiques which are articulated by foreigners yet directed at one’s own society. I’m going to describe how critiques should be handled in a pre-Ethnostate society where people of foreign EGI are allowed unpunished self-expression.

I should say in advance that the following procedure can be rendered unnecessary if people of foreign EGI are denied free right of self-expression within a society. More likely than whites spontaneously adhering to the intellectual rigor of the below-outlined scheme, is that our societies will continue to fracture into smaller units until foreign EGI has no voice and is accorded no trust within these social units, at which point we will be theoretically safe from intellectual sabotage. If there is no way for a critique to find wide-spread expression (e.g. the Culture of Critique found expression in pop music, Hollywood movies and TV), then there is at least apparently little danger of critical ideas causing wide-spread social destruction. We can use, to some extent already do use, the following procedure when investigating critiques articulated by people of foreign EGI.

Firstly, the analogy for how to treat foreign-sourced critiques is to treat them as if they were a shipment of dangerous weapons. This in the understanding that, likely as not, the shipment may contain weapons that are either booby-trapped or themselves intended for use as weapons against the receiver. In other words, the critiques may contain ideas permitting us to advance strategically, or they may contain ideas that deliberately will harm us, and most likely they contain a mixture of both. For example, a Darwinist critique of German romanticism might advance the truth search of Germans, in which case the foreign critique would have brought them advantages. If Englishmen had deliberately ‘rigged’ the critique to denude the German philosophical tradition of its ponderous, imagination-based method of self-relating, that might be a deliberate attempt at harm. European peoples don’t have much experience with intellectual warfare, since they don’t have much experience with tribalism generally. Strategic disinformation on the part of our governments is the height of aggressive ethnocentric intellectual warfare which we are usually capable of. Since our states are genocidally inclined against us, we can’t even lay claim to this being an ethnocentric act, which is the only strategic context in which they would even make sense.

When you get a shipment of foreign-sourced critiques there are several questions to be asked.

The first question is: who is this from?

Second question: what is their EGI?

Third question: What inferences can be made on the basis of existing conflicts between sender and recipient EGIs, about possible motives or preferred routes of sabotage?

Fourth question: how is the critique framed, does it seek an ammendment of the should-matrix? (The typical hack through which white morality is coopted to serve foreign EGI).

Fifth question: what ammendments to the should-matrix does the critique suggest and what strategic advantages does it promise?

Critiques which have the potential to be extremely dangerous or which come from known enemies should be recapitulated by local-source EGI’ed persons, the equivalent of rebuilding our own version of the weapon using the original as a template. In this recapitulation procedure, a person who is intellectually able to understand the content of the critique, but whose loyalty is known, restructures the critique into a series of strategic “if-then” statements. These statements diffuse the moral ardour and tone of urgency typically used by foreign saboteurs to force acceptance of their critique on the recipient. The suggested logical outcome matrix (“If you do this, then this will happen, which is what you want”) can then be looked at abstractly and dispassionately, to see if the critique actually suggests a usable amendment to current behavior.

The critique is then re-presented for consideration to a committee of people who are consciously involved in EGI-strategizing, such as the audience at this blog. If it has useful amendments in it, then these are accepted once they have been ‘naturalized’ by articulation through a local-EGI’ed critic. They are then given for experimental verification to a contingent of local-EGI’ed persons who are willing to experiment with the new suggestions. All of this can be done quite informally, indeed, we currently do it informally and unconsciously.

In the future I will take apart a common shipment of foreign-sourced critiques, what I call the ‘Sensibility Critique’, articulated in our times by uh and Silver, to show how they contain disastrously harmful memes which really are sufficient by themselves to destroy an ethnic polity.

[Article].

In my opinion, this is a great example of how these tired elite liberals are capable of simultaneously acknowledging a problem – unsustainable population levels in third world countries – and preceding to ignore it completely.  Amusingly enough, orthodox George comments on how this used to be a bid deal for the Left a generation ago and then proceeds to trail off about the Catholic church and other random things.

An influential Jewish organization on Friday (July 30) announced its opposition to a proposed Islamic center and mosque two blocks north of ground zero in Lower Manhattan, intensifying a fierce national debate about the limits of religious freedom and the meaning of the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The decision by the group, the Anti-Defamation League, touched off angry reactions.

…its national director, Abraham H. Foxman, said in an interview on Friday that the organization came to the conclusion that the location was offensive to families of victims of Sept. 11, and he suggested that the center’s backers should look for a site “a mile away.” “It’s the wrong place,” Mr. Foxman said. “Find another place.”

Asked why the opposition of the families was so pivotal in the decision, Mr. Foxman, a Holocaust survivor, said they were entitled to their emotions. “Survivors of the Holocaust are entitled to feelings that are irrational,” he said. Referring to the loved ones of Sept. 11 victims, he said, “Their anguish entitles them to positions that others would categorize as irrational or bigoted.”

As for Nmachi’s strong white characteristics, I can tell you that, having lived in racially mixed countries, it is common for a couple consisting of one mixed-race person and one pure race person to produce a child that looks like one or the other parent.  DNA contains the myriad of possible variations that we pass on to later generations, regardless of whether or not particular genes are expressed in us.  The question of Nmachi becomes not “how did this black couple make a white baby?” but “why did the press report the story, and others like it, in that way?” Why do they write from the gullibility of a cuckold rather than the worldliness, even cynicism, which we associate with print journalism?

This is a White Nationalist question.  It might not be a question about the direct control of public discourse through control of media, since this is a British story in the British media and it bears on British public discourse.  In America, where media Jews are so visible, it would be a very direct question, of course.  But it is obvious that in Britain the cultural narrative is prescribed by someone, be he Jew or extended phenotype, and that someone has a Jewish sensibility, adheres to Jewish interests, and a Jewish intolerance of opposition.

The result is that no opportunity to attack the truth that race is biological is allowed to slip by, and Nmachi’s story is a case in point.  It may seem completely ridiculous to suggest that genetic Africans can produce genetically European children through some ten million-to-one miracle (read: magic).  But to someone who constantly seeks to suggest that the world is an indistinct mass of humanity in which apparent differences are merely a matter of excess melanin, and melanin-enriched fathers and these father’s children are equally valuable to a European as European children, this is an opportunity … a Jewish proof that race does not exist in any meaningful way or, if it does, it doesn’t matter.  And if it does not matter, then the greatness of our people, of our creativity and culture and civilisation, is not really ours at all … is not of the genes, but can belong to anybody.  Through Nmachi, what we have made with our hands and minds, and who we are, is made to seem as nothing.

Unfortunately, that suggestion, though it is scientifically invalid and uniquely racist, is probably good enough to fool a lot of people.

A federal judge on Wednesday blocked the most controversial parts of Arizona’s immigration law from taking effect, delivering a last-minute victory to President Obama [...]

He has written a July 29 column on Judaism with a promising title: “Jewish hostility to Christians: the prejudice no one ever writes about.”

Unfortunately the article waffles back and forth between some good Christian instincts, Thompson’s ignorance of Judaism and his fear of being stigmatized as “antisemitic.”

Here are a couple of quotes from his piece and my brief reactions.

Damian Thompson: “You can understand why Jews might dislike the Christian religion: not only does it deify a man, the ultimate blasphemy for pious Jews…”

Michael Hoffman: Rubbish — Judaics deify themselves. That is the central idolatry at the heart of Orthodox, Talmudic  Judaism: self-worship. Cf. Babylonian Talmud, Bava Metzia 59b.

Moreover, the Chabad-Lubavitvch sect of Hasidic Judaism deifies the late Grand Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneersohn.

Thompson: “It would be interesting to read a book on anti-Christian sentiment among modern Jews, including Jewish historians who invest heavily in the notion of Christian or gentile collective guilt for crimes committed by others. But such a book would have to come from the perspective of someone without an axe to grind (ie, not one of the anti-Semitic nutcases who are such a depressing presence in the blogosphere).”

Hoffman: In other words he won’t read a critical book such as Judaism Discovered on its merits, but only if it comes from an approved elitist source. If a book packed with truths and facts was written by a scorned outcast, he would ignore it on that basis alone. What a shameful admission for an intellectual to make. How can knowledge be advanced under such snobbish criteria?

The immigration crisis in Malta and in Europe
The “hate speech” laws in Malta directed at Lowell
The Alliance of European National Movements
The concept & vision of Imperium Europa

13 MB / 32 kbps [...]