The Definitive Source For News On Jews

Update July 24th: It took just three days for Incogman to resurrect his replacement blog at Incogman.net.

I have just learned that the popular or-White blog Incogman has been suspended by its WordPress host. No specific information has yet been given by the editor of Incogman at this point, although it’s being discussed on this Stormfront thread. A WaybackMachine archive is available HERE, although only two pages were crawled.

Incogman was already being partially censored by WordPress. They had designated his blog as “Mature”, which meant his posts did not show up on WordPress’ “New Posts” screens. This may have also hampered Google blog searches for his posts as well. Nevertheless, it had still achieved an Alexa rating of 384,588 before being taken down. Incogman spoke out boldly on behalf of the White community, and “named the Jew” explicitly, although using civil terminology; he did not use racial slurs.

But that was not good enough for WordPress.

Because of the amount of time and effort invested in the blog, it’s likely Incogman will resurrect it in one form or another. As a matter of fact, this has now happened; Incogman’s new blog is at the following url:

http://incogman.net/

Stay tuned. Incogman has also posted a response in this other Stormfront thread:

Yes, they did shut me down. Permanently.

Although I have no specific knowledge of why they did it at this time (I’ve been up almost 3 years and had 1.8 million hits, even as a semi-censored blog). Possibly all this Lieberman bill business made them want to forestall any government request.

I was classified as “mature” and foolishly believed that this gave me a degree of “invisibility.” This complete censorship came out of the blue. I have noticed a major uptick in searchs for my blog and my listing was often at the top for a wide variety of search strings. I was getting close to 4000 hits a day and was in the 400,000 range for Alexa (I’m told is pretty good for a blog).

I am not sure what exactly I’m going to do now. I can put up the email address to the WordPress guy who responded to my email on why they did it and people can email him about the matter, should SF allow that. Maybe enough emails might change their mind.

Let me state for the record: Soon enough they’ll shut down every place on the Net for White people to freely talk. Maybe even here.

The White race cannot be allowed to talk freely in any public venue, if the Jews have their way.

Are we going to let these people keep cutting off our balls forever?

{snip}

Not sure what I’m going to do right yet. Ask around and see if anyone has suggestions for a blog host or domain platform that won’t do this kind of thing to Whites.

Written three years ago in 2007, Rayburn’s opinions were, ironically, a foreshadowing of things to come.   WW~ W.P. RAYBURN, JD “Don’t tell me I am wrong, you must first endeavor to prove it! Don’t simply disagree with me, show me why I am wrong, and for God’s sake move it. For if you cannot [...]

This woman is big JEW TROUBLE!

Let’s all work to spread the word on the Jew!

Youtube Just Censored This Video!
Youtube which is owned by Google has been complaining about censorship in China. This video has had over 17,000 views on its first day. Was number 4 in its favorites list for news and current events. And had hundreds of 5 star ratings.
We are appealing [...]

A ring that connects into the ‘heart’ of the Scottish and British governments and the Westminster Parliament and involved Dunblane mass child killer, Thomas Hamilton
Reporter Robert Green was arrested in Aberdeen for the crime of exposing these sick and depraved people who get their ‘kicks’ from sexually abusing and raping [...]

Censorship and repression against revisionist books and their authors is little publicized, protested or documented for posterity. Here below is another example of an inquisitional crusade against a revisionist history book (The Hoax of the Twentieth Century) perpetrated in the name of tolerance. Note that the author of the following letter to the editor approves the apparent vigilante theft of the book from the library. I am publishing this person’s letter not only to document another instance of book censorship advocacy, but as an example of the psychology of “liberal-humanitarian repression,” wherein censorship of books and ideas is advocated on the self-righteous high moral ground of suppressing “hateful ideologies.” It should also be noted that in the past, the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (“the Mounties”) raided a university campus in Canada and removed The Hoax of the Twentieth Century from the library.

Last year I asked the Cranbrook Public Library to remove a book from their shelves. Its simple exterior made it easy to overlook, a reader browsing through the non-fiction section would hardly notice the slim green paperback wedged between the heavy history books. I couldn’t miss it however, having already heard and read about it. The Hoax of the Twentieth Century, it screamed; author Arthur. R Butz. Published by the Noontide Press, a branch of the Institute for Historical Review, Butz’s book denies the Holocaust and genocide of millions of Jews. It was the ultimate irony that I should find this book in a government building; the same government that had prosecuted James Keegstra and Ernst Zundel (Both Holocaust deniers) for racial defamation and spreading hate against the Jewish people.

Every high school student in the province of British Columbia is required to pass Social Studies 11 to receive a high school diploma. Within this course the Second World War and the Holocaust are covered extensively, we are taught of Jewish Persecution, of Kristallnacht, of gas chambers, of killing spurred by hate and intolerance. One of the course goals for Social Studies 11 is to “demonstrate respect for human equality and cultural diversity”, how can this be achieved when a book denying the suffering of millions is being promoted by our public library?

I know many people would argue that “both sides have to be represented in any issue,” I know this because it has been said to me before. After filling out an extensive form explaining why the book should be removed from the library, I was confident that my reasons would be understood and the book removed.

Finding a year later that the book had still not been taken out of the library catalogue was a shock, and I expressed this to one of the librarians. She told me that there had been several complaints about the book, but that every view had to be shown of history. This is the danger of Butz’s book, hiding behind a guise of scholarly intentions the book does not appear anti-Semitic on the surface.

Reading Butz’s claims that gas chambers never existed at Auschwitz, that six million Jews did not die but were merely relocated, and that the Holocaust is a mass conspiracy perpetrated by the Jewish people to create the state of Israel, demonstrates otherwise; but may not appear so to the impressionable mind of a teenager.

Particularly if the book is in the history section of a library, being in an academic institution is an act of legitimizing Butz’s hateful ideas. The truth is there is no grey area when it comes to the Holocaust, or any genocide. Hate is a part of humanity, and to deny the suffering of the Jewish people can only promise to continue the bloody cycle of persecution.

This is not a freedom of speech issue; people have to right to believe whatever they wish, even if it is hateful and racist. However, the library is not required to endorse their views by carrying their books.
The Public Library is funded by taxpayers’ money, by allowing Butz’s book to remain we are not only giving it the facade of a valid academic resource, but we are also paying to spread the hateful ideologies of Holocaust deniers. Our library is not the only one housing Butz’s book; it is available at three other libraries in British Columbia through inter-library loan, including a college library. In a time where our country’s leaders preach equality and tolerance, I find it extremely disturbing that money meant for education of such values is being spent on blemishing our reputation as a culturally diverse and accepting society.

In a strange twist of fate, Butz’s book has gone missing from our library, but remains in the catalogue. I can only hope that another Cranbrook citizen felt the same way that I do, and took matters into their own hands.

However, as the book is still in the catalogue it may once again reappear on our library shelves in the future. I ask Cranbrook citizens to not sit idly by, in remaining passive; we become part of the problem. For the memory of those who perished in the Holocaust and for those who survived it, I urge every concerned reader to file a complaint to the library regarding Arthur R. Butz’s Hoax Of the Twentieth Century: The Case Against the Presumed Extermination of European Jewry.

According to the Cranbrook Public Library’s Chief Librarian Ursula Brigl, anyone can submit a Request for Reconsideration of a Title at the library. Brigl looks at the request, researches if the same situation has come up at other libraries and gathers information on what was done in those cases. She said she wants to make sure she gives sound reasons that have been thoroughly considered based on all the best information when she makes her decision.

Brigl said sometimes it can take awhile for information she requests from other libraries to get to her and the research can take months, even a year. Brigl said she takes every Request for Reconsideration of a Title very seriously and in order to make the best decision she does extensive research. After she has finished her report on the request Brigl presents it to the Library Board, along with the original Request for Reconsideration of a Title so they can see what the original request was. She then makes her recommendation and the board makes its decision.

Brigl said titles that go missing are assessed according to their circulation and currency. She said generally if the item was published in the last 10 years and its circulation shows people were looking at it on a regular basis it will be replaced. If it is an older title that wasn’t circulating much then they wouldn’t replace it because there isn’t a demand for the title.

The US government in the person of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is pressuring China to end Internet censorship. This is inspired by China’s alleged repression against “freedom-loving” Google.

Be aware that the US Department of State has partnered with the Israeli government and various thought police NGOs to “monitor” exposure of the truth about Judaism and Zionism online. Both the Israeli government and elite Zionists around the world advocate Internet censorship of World War II revisionism (“Holocaust denial”).  Elie Wiesel recently urged the government of Hungary to improve its image by jailing revisionist historians. Germany, the close ally of the US and the Israelis, jails revisionists and censors the Internet. The US is complicit in the German repression. Obama has met with German jailer Angela Merkel and praised her “democratic values.”

Google acts as the enforcement arm of the religion of Holocaustianity, protecting it from scrutiny, skepticism and exposure. We are reproducing here correspondence from Google related to Google Inc.’s 2006 censorship of two of our revisionist videos from the Internet. What does Mrs. Clinton have to say about Google’s censorship?

Google has been notified that your videos violate our Program Policies
The titles of the videos are listed at the end of this message.

According to our policy, we are removing the following videos:

World War Two Revisionist Charles Provan
Deborah Lipstadt, “Amalek” and David Irving

To review our Program Policies please visit:
http://video.google.com/support/bin/answer.py?answer=27737&topic=1490

If you believe this removal was done in error, please respond to this
email. (End quote)

Feb. 22, 2006

***

The Google corporation defines “Holocaust” revisionism as “hate speech,” and on that basis withdrew the Lipstadt and Provan videos from broadcast. The censored Lipstadt video demonstrated how “Holocaust” High Priestess Lipstadt had labeled historian David Irving “Amalek,” which is incitement that could possibly lead to his death. The censored Charles Provan video consisted of an interview with a researcher who believes in the gas chambers and differs with mainstream historians only on certain details. Hence, even belief in the gas chambers, when it is not total belief, in every single detail of the “Holocaust” story, now constitutes “hate speech.” If this is not totalitarianism, what is?  Google initially approved these two videos and broadcast them for approximately one month. The videos were removed only due to outside pressure.

Deborah Lipstadt has publicly labeled my “Amalek” video about her, “revolting.”

In 2006 in the Washington Post, William Bennett and Alan Dershowitz chastised the American media for having failed to publish the cartoons against Muhammad which first appeared in Denmark: “…radical Islamists have won a war of intimidation. They have cowed the major news media from showing these cartoons. The mainstream press has capitulated to the Islamists…”

Radical Judaics are also winning a war of intimidation. They have cowed Google into censoring a video critical of Deborah Lipstadt, and another video which maintains that the execution gas chambers existed, but that they were operated mainly by Judaics. Are “intimidation” and “capitulation” only wrong when they emanate from Islamic coercion? What about Judaic intimidation of the media? It must be at a higher level of power and control, because unlike the Islamic version, Judaic intimidation is not publicized in the US media. It is perpetrated largely without the knowledge of the public.

FROM: GOOGLE VIDEO SUPPORT

To: Michael A. Hoffman II

Date: Wed Feb 22, 2006 08:00:17 PM PST

Subject: Re: [#47515979] Re: Google Video Policy Violation

Hi Mike,

Thank you for your email. We received complaints that your content violates our posted policy against hate speech.

Because the videos appear to promote Holocaust Revisionism, in violation of our policy against hate speech, we have removed the videos.

We appreciate your understanding.

Sincerely, The Google Video Team  (end quote)

Jeffrey Goldberg, a Jewish blogger who posts regularly on The Atlantic, is now absolutely obsessed with C-SPAN. He simply cannot let go of the fact that when Michael Scheuer appeared on C-SPAN on January 4th, 2010, he and several callers into the program expressed public opposition to the Zionist agenda.

It was one caller’s reaction that got the Jewish blogosphere in a tizzy. A caller referring to himself as John from Franklin, NY, who also identified himself as a political independent, questioned our policy of fighting Muslims on behalf of Israel. Here’s the excerpt:

John from Franklin: I for one am sick and tired of all these Jews coming on C-SPAN and other stations and pushing us to go to war against our Muslim friends. They’re willing to spend the last drop of American blood and treasure to get their way in the world. They have way too much power in this country. People like Wolfowitz and Feith and the other neo-cons — that jewed us into Iraq — and now we’re going to spend the next 60 years rehabilitating our soldiers — I’m sick and tired of it.

Instead of censoring or lecturing John, the host chose to allow Scheuer to respond, and Scheuer did, without passing judgment on John’s politics. But that was not good enough for the Jewish blogosphere, which decried them all as “anti-Semitic”, and imperiously demanded a ritualistic public condemnation by C-SPAN.

But Jeffrey Goldberg is the one Jewish blogger who has been singularly obsessed with C-SPAN. First he called C-SPAN host Bill Scanlan, demanding an explanation. Scanlan wisely refused to stoop to Goldberg’s level and would not discuss it at length, instead referring Goldberg to his producer.

Not satisfied with Scanlan’s response, Goldberg then began stalking C-SPAN’s vice-president for programming, Terry Murphy, wanting to discuss the network’s call-in policies, but like Scanlan, Murphy refused to accommodate Goldberg’s tactics. Instead he detailed C-SPAN spokesman Howard Mortman to e-mail a reply which stated that the live, town-hall format of the program can occasionally give rise to distasteful statements by callers making it to air, and admitting that controlling it can be an imperfect process. Mortman also firmly stated that program hosts are certainly permitted to step in when a caller makes ad hominem attacks or uses obscenity or obviously racist language.

But Mortman’s response still did not satisfy Goldberg, who complained to Mortman that the problem was happening “too frequently” to be characterized as a slip-up, and continues to demand an interview with Terry Murphy under the guise of “accountability”. As a result of Goldberg’s obsession, the public is starting to react negatively – to Goldberg – and have expressed themselves to him. Goldberg posted one response that he found amusing:

Mr Goldberg,
I know thinking outside your shallow, Zionist ideologies and prejudices may at times be quite difficult for you but I urge you to try in the instance of you challenging C-SPAN. It’s quite uncouth for you to peddle such vitriolic “journalism” against such a shining flagship for open and free media for and by the people of AMERICA (not Israel). Essentially I just want to let you know I find your condemnation of the freedom of C-SPAN to be quite disgusting. I guess you and your kind won’t rest until ALL of television is pro-Israel, Zionist controlled, ADL garbage. Too bad you guys couldn’t just settle for 99%. Why don’t you start writing pissy, poorly written articles every time the Arab world and the Islamic world are bastardized in the media? Oh wait. I know; it’s because you are a mean, racist, Zionist Jew who turns his head to the same injustices of groups other than your own. Besides your miniscule readership of flaming Zionists, I’m afraid not many are caring for or about what you say.

Although, I am a Goy with opposing perspectives from your own I hope you are able to avoid forwarding my contact information to Zionist monitoring networks/agencies as well as distributing my comments to third parties. Thanks.

And in a fourth separate post on this same subject, Goldberg published yet another response from an irate member of the public:

Dear Zionist traitor,
C-Span is the only network that tells the truth. Thats because its not controlled by the Jew corporations like Disney and CBS. Thats why your having a war against C-Span, because their not afraid of you. Their the only tv station that isn’t under your thumbs. So give up, Jews. One day all the television shows will tell the truth about what you do to our country.

The misspellings embedded in the above letter may also imply the possibility that it could have been sent by a Jew or an anti-racist activist masquerading as an “anti-Semite” in order to bring discredit upon those who expose Jewish supremacism. But just imagine – considering all the much more serious issues being addressed throughout the world, including climate change, health care, and Haiti, Jeffrey Goldberg is so obsessed with a single television program and its perceived “anti-Semitic” content that he has published four separate posts on it. Talk about myopic obsession.

Other pro-White sources discussing this issue include Stormfront, the Vanguard News Network Forum, Natallnews, and Newsnet14.

My comments in red.  WW~
By Rabbi Nachum Shifren
November 30, 2009
NewsWithViews.com
How the ADL is working to destroy America
It is difficult to write about Jewish traitors, but I have the [...]

Ambassador Zhou Wenzhong
Embassy of China
2201 Wisconsin Avenue, N.W.
Washington D.C. 20007

Jan. 13, 2010

Dear Ambassador Wenzhong

Re: Google vs. China

In today’s news we read what appears to be the stirring stand of Google, the Internet search engine giant, in defying “Chinese censorship.” The U.S. media is complicit in disseminating the farcical myth about Google’s alleged stand against censorship.

The fact is, Google itself practices censorship of dissident history and scholarship. Scientists, historians and journalists in the West who investigate and subsequently dissent from any aspect of the vast corpus of World War II history classified under the neologism “The Holocaust,” are denied access to the public by various forms of censorship and repression. Dissident investigative research by scholars and journalists in this field is called by the pejorative and highly inaccurate quasi-theological term, “Holocaust denial.”

At Google this takes the form of refusing advertisements for “Holocaust denial” books and other media and censoring any form of expression dubbed “Holocaust denial.”

In 2006 Google censored videos produced by this writer that pertained to Auschwitz, Deborah Lipstadt and the Protestant historian Charles Provan. In the case of Mr. Provan, the video interview with him was censored by Google because Provan, who accepts the claims of homicidal gas chambers allegedly used by the Nazis, dared to state in the course of his videotaped interview, that Judaic inmates were the ones who operated the killing gas chambers in the concentration camp at Treblinka.

After receiving numerous complaints and protests over the removal of my history videos from “Google Video,” the Google corporation never responded to a single complainant. Google’s arrogance and hypocrisy truly knows no bounds.

The history videos censored by Google contained no racial invective of any kind. Neither did they contain any sexual pornography. They were censored by Google strictly on the basis that they contradicted the official American version of what transpired during World War II.

I am writing to inform you and the Chinese people that Google’s attempt to pose as a champion of freedom of speech against China, is a sham. They are censors and what is more, they are dishonest censors in that they pretend to be advocates of freedom of speech when they are in fact guilty of the very thing for which they accuse the government of China.

Sincerely,
Michael Hoffman

Former reporter, New York Bureau of the Associated Press

Box 849, Coeur d’Alene, Idaho 83816 USA

E-mail: hoffman@revisionisthistory.org

Charles Fishman sent the following article by Randall Bytwerk, Professor of Communication Arts and Sciences at Calvin College, regarding the promotion of books denying the Holocaust at the Amazon.com site:

If one goes to Amazon.com and searches for books promoting Holocaust denial, most of them have 5-star reviews at the top. How has that happened? Amazon ranks reviews by how “helpful” or “unhelpful” customers rate them. Take Arthur Butz’s The Hoax of the Twentieth Century. There are a total of 49 customer reviews. 17 are 5-star. 25 are 1-star. However, the top review (5-star) has been rated as helpful by 83 of 110 customers. One of the better 1-star reviews has 61 helpful ratings out of 105 total ratings, with the result that it is way down on the list.

The consequence is that unsuspecting customers, seeing all those 5-star reviews at the top, may be inclined to think the book must be good.

What to do? First, one must be an Amazon customer. If you are, there are two things to consider.

First, it would be good to have some strong reviews of the various Holocaust denial books. Quite a few of the 1-star reviews are filled with invective, which is not persuasive to many readers. Amazon allows one to post reviews under one’s real name if one wishes, but since that opens one up to various unpleasant consequences, one can also use a different name.

Second, and easier, one can rate existing reviews as “helpful” or “unhelpful.” That option is available at the end of each customer review. Most readers of this list will know the names to look for, but here is my list of leading “Revisionist” authors: Arthur Butz, Thomas Dalton, Germar Rudolf, Veronica Clark (a relative newcomer), and Carlo Mottogno. Others will probably suggest additions to this list.

I’d also appreciate help with a related book: Michael Ford’s self-published translation of Mein Kampf. I don’t think Ford himself is a neo-Nazi (although the promotional material for his book on Amazon states: “decide for yourself if he was a mad-man or a genius,” and it’s clear that he doesn’t think Hitler was a mad-man). Ford’s translation is pretty bad (his previous books include how to avoid being scammed on eBay and how to find a job if you are a felon). However, some neo-Nazis have jumped to his defense, and have been going after me with some energy (look at the comments on reviews if you are curious). “Helpful” ratings of my review would be appreciated.

A hundred or so “unhelpful” ratings will drive most of these books into the amazon cellar.

Professor Bytwerk is currently working on a website exploring Nazi Propaganda.

Alyssa Lappen — who has been engaged in a dispute with Amazon over books that propagate lies about Israel — says that anyone interested in knowing how to proceed most effectively with this fight is welcome to contact her: alyssa@alyssaalappen.org.

(End quote)

National Alliance Cincinnati Unit Coordinator Robert Ransdell has fired back at Northern Kentucky University’s newspaper, The Northerner, over their sudden cancellation of an ad for Resistance Records that had been placed two weeks ago and was suddenly pulled after pressure from politically-correct students. That issue was described in my previous post and first surfaced on Natallnews.

This is not the letter to the editor that Ransdell promised; it has presumably been sent, but not yet published. Instead, Ransdell published a series of four comments in response to the pathetic apology published by The Northerner’s editor, Tim Owens, in order to explain his position. Because of the possibility that Owens may choose to delete the comments, I’m cross-posting them below, but leading off with one other comment which levies a false accusation against Ransdell:

Your name Wed Nov 11 2009 21:51
Robert Ransdell, the local representative for Resistance Records, is already bragging on the Resistance Records forum that he will fight the Northerner’s refusal to print his advertisements. Perhaps the paper should have checked Mr. Ransdell out. He has an extensive criminal record in Ohio and Kentucky and is well known by police in the area for promoting neo-Nazi, racist activities. Nonetheless, this seems like an honest mistake by the paper and I applaud the editor taking responsibility for, and correcting, the error.

Ransdell’s first comment is in response to the comment above:

R. Ransdell Thu Nov 12 2009 17:04
Whoever claimed I have an extensive criminal record is engaging in slander. I have spent not a day in jail in my life. Whoever finds it prudent to go on websites spreading slander about me is also probably capable of working through channels to get websites they disagree with knocked offline. This happened multiple times when we had ads running. I am not going to say much of anything more here, I will be posting a letter I wrote to the paper that pretty much says all that needs to be said on NatAllNews. The media cooked up this outrage as they always do, in response to the complaints of a few individuals.If you listen to groups like Skrewdriver, No Remorse, or Saga, you will see that the music simply looks to promote identity and pride in the hearts and minds of white people. You had a rapper appear at that school a few weeks back that have made negative statements against whites, there is some hypocrisy there I would say.

R. Ransdell Thu Nov 12 2009 17:09
Oh and just to let you know, hacking and knocking websites offline is classified as a felony, so that might be something to think about the next time you try. Goons like Mark Potok at the SPLC would be who I would assume would monitor our forums and then go and slander people on website comment boards, they would also have no qualms about engaging in illegal behavior online. And of course you hide behind the cloak of the internet, while people like myself post under my name, here and on our forum.

R. Ransdell Thu Nov 12 2009 17:16
Finally, yes I am most probably on an FBI watch list or what ever for simply standing up for the ethnic majority in the same fashion that minority groups stand up for their people and their rights and interests. I have a TV show here that promotes our message in NKY and have for years been active. Of course this makes on a supposed threat in this day and age. But as Skrewdriver once wrote in a song “When the capitalists and the communists co-exist, if you love your country you’ll be on their list.” I love my country, what it was truly envisioned to be by the founders, I love the culture and history of my people even though we have not always been perfect and believe we deserve to control our own destiny based on what is best for us. I also believe other groups have the same right to do so. If I am “dangerous” because of this then let them put me on a list, I could care less.

R. Ransdell Thu Nov 12 2009 17:23
Once last point should be made. I never said that I was going to fight the decision of the paper to pull the ads, this is backed up by the letter I wrote to the editor upon hearing about all of this. It is also mentioned in another smear-job article in the Enquirer today, it says quite plainly that I had no plans to fight the decision. Lies and slander revealed to be such.

The referenced Enquirer article is published HERE in the Kentucky Enquirer, which appears to be an extension of the parent Cincinnati Enquirer. According to this article, after The Northerner decided to stop running the advertisement, the paper’s advertising manager sent an e-mail to Robert Ransdell, who paid for the advertisement. Ransdell replied with a lengthy e-mail saying he disagreed with the decision but he understood. Ransdell understands the newspaper’s position but said throughout the e-mail that he meant no ill-will toward the newspaper. Ransdell had paid $120 for the first ad, but still owed another $120. Tim Owens said the paper will return the check for the first ad and does not want payment for the second. As of this post, 32 comments have been appended to the story; registration required to post comments. No comments to the story by Ransdell were identified.

Additional stories have now surfaced on WCPO Channel 9 and the Cincinnati Beacon. Robert Ransdell has opened up a discussion thread on the Resistance Forum. Since this post was published, three more related stories were published on Natallnews:

– Resistance Music: They Smear What They Fear, November 13th
– Simple Ad Has Usual Suspects In Uproar Against Resistance Music, November 13th
– A Challenge For Debate Instead Of Censorship And Slander, November 13th

Update November 12th: Robert Ransdell fires off preliminary reponse; updated post HERE.

The Natallnews website tells us that censorship is alive and well in Northern Kentucky University (NKU), located in Newport. The editor of The Northerner, the school’s newspaper, groveled before the gods of politically correctness and pulled an ad for Resistance Records.

WXIX Channel 19 provides the media story with video. For the past two weeks, The Northerner has published the ad in question. The ad contains about two dozens words in black and white that got some diversity-brainwashed NKU students in a tizzy. They complain that Resistance Records, operated by the National Alliance, is an online store for music made by neo-Nazi artists and white supremacist musicians. NKU freshman William Christopher said, …”this ad isn’t offensive, but I know the website would be, and it shouldn’t be in a college newsletter” And another freshman, Danielle Spears, chirped on cue, “Especially if they’re promoting diversity in our school”.

[Ed. Note: Now just wait a minute, Danielle. If you are so sold on "diversity", wouldn't you want your school to be allowing MULTIPLE points of view? Including those with which you disagree? Furthermore, if you actually visited the National Alliance website, you would know that they promote White separatism, NOT White supremacism.]

But NKU senior Nicole Petrelli showed a more mature attitude and a greater respect for the First Amendment. “They have the right to free speech. But at the same time, whether or not people agree with it is another story. I don’t personally agree with it, but they have the right to purchase a page just like any other group I guess.”

Northerner Editor in Chief Tim Owens said he spent Tuesday November 10th responding to a storm of comments and questions about the advertisement, and characterized it as an honest mistake. This week’s issue just hit the stands on Wednesday, and includes an apology and a hole where the ad once was. Read the apology HERE. Owens also said the man who paid a $120 for the first ad still owes the paper for the second one, but The Northerner will not accept his money. The man in question appears to be Robert Ransdell, the Coordinator for the National Alliance’s Cincinnati Unit; this unit has been involved in a wide variety of local activism, to include literature distribution, Adopt-A-Highway litter cleanup, and confronting Holocaust “experts”. Ransdell has opened up a discussion thread on the Resistance Forum.

Censorship appears to be a way of life at Northern Kentucky University. According to the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education (FIRE) 2009 speech codes report, NKU is a “red-light” university. A “red light” institution has at least one policy that both clearly and substantially restricts freedom of speech. This means it maintains a climate hostile to free speech. You can see the list of universities in Appendix B beginning on page 27 of the report. The “red-light” category is by far the largest, followed by the “yellow-light” category, then the “green-light” category, where free speech is generally permitted.

FIRE maintains a specific page about NKU HERE. Restrictions on expressive rights are summarized HERE. Note that FIRE has held NKU under scrutiny for several years now.

Update November 15th: The old South Africa Sucks blog has now been replaced with a newer version, My South Africa Sucks.

http://mysasucks.com/

I have just learned that one of the few hard-hitting pro-White blogs telling the unvarnished truth about life for Whites in post-apartheid South Africa is shutting down permanently as of Friday November 13th, 2009. On that day, the South Africa Sucks blog will go out of business.

The chief editor of the blog, Uhuru Guru, has encountered constant opposition from day number one. Three previous versions of this blog hosted on Blogger were ToS’d. Each time Uhuru Guru rebuilt the blog. Finally, he rebuilt it on the current host, which was less politically correct.

But Uhuru Guru also encountered some recent legal trouble, described in this previous post. He was arrested on an old 1993 warrant, but then suddenly released after 26 hours. He fears further retaliation from the state. Thus, he no longer believes he can justify subjecting his family to these continued threats.

Other relatively uncensored news about South Africa, updated frequently, can be found on Jan Lamprecht’s African Crisis website. Here’s Uhuru Guru’s full post explaining why he’s taking the site down (after the jump):

The End of the Road for SA Sucks

Dear readers, bloggers and fellow Whites

This will be the last of many thousands of posts & articles we at WSAS sweated so much blood & tears to bring you over the years. I am shutting down this ground-breaking blog on Friday 13 November.

As you’re aware, the situation has become utterly untenable. I am no longer willing to put the welfare and safety of my family, and the families of other SA-resident bloggers at risk. It is heart-breaking, and a tough decision I struggled with (but was in denial about) since my arrest and detention last week. Your incredible support really moved me. So did the support of so many other bloggers, friends and comrades, locally as well as overseas.

I know some will call me a coward, a quitter, a yellow-bellied traitor even. So be it. I can no longer look my precious daughters, or my long-suffering wife in the eye, see their fear and sheer terror every time there is a knock on the door and continue to ignore it. I am torn between on the one hand my duty as a father & husband to ensure the safety and security of my gorgeous family, and on the other my duty & loyalty to my magnificent, beautiful White race.

It really hurts like hell that the worst betrayals came from within our own ranks. Not that I am a stranger to it either – over the past four years of this blog’’s existence, we’ve had to fend off far more vicious attacks from those on the right claiming to be our racial brethren, than any number of sellouts, liberals or misguided & brainwashed race traitors spouting their pre-programmed propaganda memes on this forum.

The SA Sucks blog was symptomatic of a wider phenomenon: that of Whites throwing off the oppressive chains of political correctness and needless guilt. As the race which spearheaded civilization, technology, art, music and ‘high culture’ we have so much to be proud of. South Africa was a glittering beacon in a sea of African darkness, now it is rapidly fading away. Internationally the pendulum is swinging to the right as our people’s infatuation with multi-culturalism turns into apprehension, disgust and finally, rejection. Lets hope our racial awakening is not too late. Sadly in SA, it is.

The rise of the internet rates on par in our history with the invention of Gutenberg’s printing press. It broke the media choke-hold on our minds, and became a tool with which we can set ourselves free from the endless demands of the parasite races leeching off our decency and artificially, needlessly instilled guilt.

The closure of SA Sucks is not the end of the world – excellent websites and blogs already exist where you can continue to read uncensored, hard-hitting news, commentary and insights. I implore you, dear reader to support especially those we have linked to. I also implore you to take the baton from us, go forth and create your own blogs and websites. Please carry on the momentum, and learn from the foolish mistakes I made. Trust nobody, guard your online identity with your life, and above all, stay true to your heritage.

As the Negros in America have their proverbial “Uncle Toms”, so we dwinding Whites in SA have our “Uncle Freds”. Watch out for them, guard against them and remember the prophetic words of Cicero:

“A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself.

For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder is less to fear.” Cicero Marcus Tullius
106-43 BC

As of last week, I entered a rather forboding, dark and grim phase of my life and what the future holds is suddenly quite uncertain. Pandora’s box opened rather abruptly last Wednesday. The endless death threats to my family are no longer limited to my email and comments pages, but are now trickling through our home & cell phones. Although I always considered it an extremely remote, paranoid possibility that my door would be kicked down as it was, I never really expected it to come to that.

If you’re still in SA, please heed the message of this blog since its inception – get out, get out get out, while you still can! You’re not “running away”. You are carrying out the only rational, logical option open to you. This ship is sinking fast, either you jump or go down with it. Secondly, depriving the murderous parasites of your brains, your skills, your taxes, your participation in what formerly was a fantastic country to live in, will not only set you free – it is also the ultimate sanction – depriving the parasites of a host. Let them have their land, and their renamed towns, their crumbling roads, cities, collapsing power utilities, schools, hospitals, their corruption and their savagery. Shrug Atlas, shrug!

Folks, I sincerely thank all of you for reading and participating in this blog. Without our core of readers, we would have been nothing. To my fellow bloggers – Doodler, Dark Raven, Uncle Cracker, Gonville, Bantu Ed, Foxie, Cynic, Grumbleguts, HODD, Eli the Bearded, Knorrig, Real Realist, Truthsayer USA, Adriana, Diamed – thank you for your fantastic work and your tireless efforts to get the truth out about South Africa.

To those whom I insulted, argued with and belittled over the years, I apologise. Some of you deserved it, some not. Bygones now. I wish you all well, and hope some day we’ll all be back here. Always remember, we’re not the last of a dying breed, but the first of a brave new world.

Goodbye my dear friends, go thee well.

Uhuru Guru

11 November 2009

This blog was dedicated to the Sons and Daughters of Europe Wherever They Reside.

“In the end all will be forgiven except treachery to the race”

It is a tragedy that this valuable resource will be lost. But Uhuru Guru deserves a hat tip for keeping it up as long as he did under relentless pressure from all sides. Including, unfortunately, our own from time to time. Some foreign White nationalists, ignorant of the unique conditions prevailing within South Africa, would criticize SAS for not “naming the Jew” enough. They failed to recognize that, in a country where Whites are outnumbered by Blacks 9-to-1, Whites would not have an incentive to reject a white Jew simply because he is a Jew. Sometimes you must take your allies as you find them.

Under the incompetent black majority government of the African National Congress (ANC) in South Africa, justice is inefficient at best and vindictive at worst. Uhuru Guru, the nickname of a White dissident who opposes the black majority government in South Africa and who posts regularly on the South Africa Sucks blog, was arrested on November 4th, 2009 on a 1993 “fraud charge” warrant. A massive contingent of police from no less than five different specialist units, ranging from Organised Crime, Cyber crime, vehicle theft, etc; raided his home and confiscated all his computer equipment. They initially pulled every trick in the book to prevent him from getting him to court for bail. After being detained for 26 hours, he was then released after the Senior State Prosecutor referred to the fact that the case was nineteen years old and not properly investigated and refused to put it on the Court roll. But he may still be subject to prosecution. This incident is also being discussed on The Right Perspective; a TRP interview with a Boer expatriate is available HERE.

One media source – the Beeld – picked up the story, but it’s in Afrikaans. It is discussed in this post. The Beeld apparently claimed that Uhuru Guru was charged, his case then postponed, and then was released on bail, based upon input from the South African Police Service (SAPS). However, none of these events apparently happened; instead, he was handcuffed at Linden SAPS, taken to the court cells and then merely released from the cells at court and told to leave. Third World justice. An English-language story is available at the FTO website.

In this November 8th post entitled “An incredible tale of betrayal”, Uhuru Guru tells the full story. Here’s an excerpt:

I was wrongfully and maliciously arrested on charges dating back to 1993, and detained with hardened criminals for about 26 hours. They released me without even bringing me before court – the chief prosecutor at Randburg court refused to even place the case on the roll, so baseless and frivolous were the charges of “fraud and theft”. My legal representatives were awesome, in spite of the tremendous behind the scenes conspiracies to keep me in detention. After scrutinising the docket, a magistrate agreed with my attorney and advocate that the case has no merit and ordered my immediate release – without even putting me in the dock, or requiring me to apply for bail.

The fact that I was arrested had absolutely nothing to do with the search & seizure warrant which enabled police from no less than 5 specialist investigating units to kick down my door in a manner reminiscent of Gestapo or ZANU-PF thugs style modus operandi. The warrant was issued on the basis that I am being suspected of 1) crimen injuria; and 2) contraventions of the Electronic Communications Act, inter alia hacking, disseminating viruses, launching “Denial of Service” (DDOS) attacks on websites etc.

All of my equipment was seized, including numerous PC’s and servers, and in excess of 500 CD’s & DVD discs. I was informed by the superintendent leading the raid that this equipment will be scrutinised by the Organised Crime, Cybercrimes units (as well as the NIA probably) after which they may or may not bring indictments against me. Whether this will happen in the next week, after several months (if at all) is unclear at this stage. Judging from the wrongful arrest, plus the fact that I am innocent of these spurious allegations of hacking etc. I do not expect any indictments but it was clear that the investigating officers were eager to throw the book at me, so I welcome and look forward to a possibly upcoming trial so I can prove my innocence.

The seizure of all his equipment constitutes economic warfare against him, since it could impinge upon his ability to make a living and pay for a legal defense in the future.

But what really sticks in Uhuru Guru’s craw is that this ops appears to have been initiated and orchestrated by a long time “friend” of his, who supposedly possesses impeccable “conservative” and “right wing” credentials. This individual had an extremely close friendship with Uhuru Guru, yet the individual turned into a Judas Iscariot. But what may have precipitated the breakdown of the friendship is the fact that Uhuru Guru chose to take on this man to task for his endless treasonous public attacks on people like Dr Dan Roodt, attorney Paul Kruger and so many other pro-White ’stryders’. The situation escalated and many vitriolic emails were exchanged as hostilities got out of hand. Three weeks ago he circulated an email in which he stated that he hoped “God would forgive him for the hell he was about to unleash on my [Uhuru Guru's] family”.

And apparently that “hell” was unleashed on November 4th. Monitor South Africa Sucks for future developments.

Obama Will Consider Hate Bill Wednesday

Zionist Hikind has ordered American Express credit card company to stop historian David Irving’s readers from paying for his books with American Express. The company has complied with Hikind’s command!

Mr. Limbaugh has been made into a free speech martyr because his business partners dropped him from a joint offer to purchase a professional football team, based on statements he  made about black football players; meanwhile Irving’s case has received almost no publicity.

The very commercial basis of financial transactions necessary for obtaining the words of David Irving in print has just been hijacked by Hikind and the gang of shysters and pols he recruited to pressure American Express. Outrage anyone?

[UPDATE BELOW] New York State Assemblyman Dov Hikind (D-Brooklyn), a child of Holocaust survivors, is leading the charge among his colleagues to force American Express to rescind the merchant agreement of notorious Holocaust denier David Irving, who has commenced a United States book tour to promote his new hate-filled tome entitled, Banged Up: Survival as a Political Prisoner in 21st Century Europe. 

“The notion that a well-regarded financial entity like American Express conducts business with someone of Irving’s ilk is absolutely astounding to me,” remarked Hikind.

To express their outrage, Hikind and a dozen elected officials, including Senate Democratic Conference Leader John L. Sampson, wrote to AMEX Chairman and CEO Kenneth I. Chenault saying, “By processing charges for tickets to Mr. Irving’s United States, hate-filled speaking tour, as well as for his publications, your company is sanctioning his repugnant message.”

The letter continues, “According to your own merchant reference guide, ‘American Express has built a brand that is synonymous with trust, integrity, security, quality, and customer service. We work diligently to uphold our reputation and restrict Merchants from engaging in activities that would harm our business or brand.’ Surely, Mr. Irving’s actions constitute a breach of the merchant agreement. My undersigned colleagues and I strongly urge you to rescind Mr. Irving’s merchant agreement.”

Previously, Irving has claimed that people pretend to be Holocaust survivors because, “there’s money involved and they can get a good compensation cash payment out of it.” Some of his other rabid and factually perverse comments include, “It [the Holocaust] is something like a religion…..The Intellectual Adventure is that we are reversing this entire trend within the space of one generation – that in a few years time, no one will believe this particular legend anymore……Yes, hundreds of thousands of people were killed, but there were no factories of death. All that is a blood libel against the German people.”

In response to Irving’s outrageous statements, Hikind remarked, “It is my sincere hope that American Express will do the right thing in this regard, and take swift and decisive action to revoke Mr. Irving’s privileges to bring us one step closer to putting Mr. Irving out of business.” 

The following elected officials lent their names to the letter sent to AMEX Chairman Chenault: Assemblymembers Peter Abbate, Michael Benjamin, Vivian Cook, Rory Lancman, Nick Perry; Senators Eric Adams, Carl Kruger, John Sampson, and Diane Savino; Councilmembers Mathieu Eugene, Michael Nelson, and Kendall Stewart.

[UPDATE]: 5:00PM EST OCT. 20: Assemblyman Hikind has just released the following statement:

AMEX SPOKESPERSON: “DAVID IRVING’S ACCOUNT HAS BEEN REVOKED EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY.”

HIKIND: “We applaud American Express for doing the right thing. Let this be a lesson to all of us to remain vigilant against hate-mongers like Irving.” (End quote; emphasis supplied).

MICHAEL HOFFMAN: Observe Hikind’s Talmudic-supremacist mentality in action: always giving everyone else a “lesson” in morality, while forever demonizing competitors in the marketplace of ideas as “hatemongers.”