Posts Tagged ‘Christianity’
Preface: Dear readers of Pragmatic Witness, well, I am back in the saddle so to speak, at least, for awhile since losing my prestigious job last Friday. Actually, I was fired! Shortly after being hired in to this national corporation, which I will not name, I discovered it had been bought by the Blackstone Group [...]
This article was inspired by the interview between Mark Glenn and Mark Dankof on The Ugly Truth, May 28, 2010. For semantic purposes in the article below the word “Jew” does not refer to the Israelites or Judeans of ancient times, nor does it define the man/God Jesus Christ since he was neither Jew nor [...]
Suggestion: when you’re confused and you don’t know what to think about a certain issue (like this one), just ask yourself: “WWPT?” (What Would Pierce Think?) [1]. (By the way: speaking of Christianity, do you like Mexicans? You can thank Catholic priests for them – i.e., they’re the result of church-sanctioned unions of White Spaniards + Mexican Indians):
[1] see footnote #2 [Here].
Mary and her Jewish roots, Moses, the Jew Saul becoming St. Paul, this guy Scofield and his Jew-sponsored Bible – it’s hard to tell where Judaism ends and Christianity begins:
The Jewish Ron Paul “Revolution” Is Instead a Jewish Counter-Revolution Against America and Its Foundational Values
Christopher Jon Bjerknes
http://www.jewishracism.com
http://www.jewishracism.blogspot.com
The great American Revolution was an European revolt against the Jews, which ironically had to take place across the pond from Jewish occupied Europe. Yes, the Jew Haym Solomon provided funds for the revolt, [...]
Excerpt:
Lenin said, "We will make the United States spend itself Into bankruptcy;"
and Stalin and Khrushchev have many times said that they would
make our strength collapse from internal troubles. For a whole generation,
our own government has been infiltrated and infested with men who
are Marxists, completely devoted to the ideal of totally destroying our
whole economic and political System so that they can replace it with
Socialism. These men who are Communists in everything but name
always call themselves "Liberals." This, also, was foretold in the Bible to
for Isaiah 32:5 encourages us to wait for a time when, as the prophet says,The VILE person shall be no more called ‘Liberal."
A website quoted Giacomo Babini, emeritus bishop of Grosseto, as saying he believed a "Zionist attack" was behind the criticism, considering how "powerful and refined" the criticism is, the Guardian daily reported.
Allegedly speaking to the Catholic website Pontifex, the 81-year-old was quoted as saying: "They do not want the church, they are its natural enemies. Deep down, historically speaking, the Jews are God killers."
Italy’s Bishops’ Conference rushed out a statement quoting Babini denying he had given the interview in the first place.
"Statements I have never made about our Jewish brothers have been attributed to me," he said.
Babini has previously been quoted on the Pontifex website accusing Jews of exploiting the Holocaust, as well as criticising homosexuality.
The American Jewish Committee, which spotted the interview on Friday, said Babini was using "slanderous stereotypes, which sadly evoke the worst Christian and Nazi propaganda prior to world war two".
Pope Benedict has come under increasing pressure over his handling of a series of cases involving proven molesters before he became pope in 2005 – most recently in California, where his signature appears on an 1985 letter opposing calls to defrock a pedophile priest.
Bishop Giacomo Babini: Vatican Sex Abuse Uproar a ‘Zionist Attack’ from Jews
Oswald Spengler
Can the West and its peoples be saved? And what will this take–particularly if we are concerned with a long-term solution rather than a last ditch “stop gap?” Can a new High Culture of the West arise to secure the existence of the peoples of the West for an extended time frame? What characteristics should such a new culture have?
I will assume the reader is familiar with the civilizational model of Oswald Spengler, a model essentially adopted by Francis Parker Yockey in his various works on the West and its future possibilities. With a Spring, Summer, Autumn, and Winter of a High Culture, “Winter” is the phase of oncoming oblivion. It is clear, at least to me (and it seems that Michael O’Meara agrees with this assessment), that we are in the “Winter” of our current modern Western (i.e., “Faustian”) High Culture. And, immersed within this decay, bereft of an overriding organizing principle to provide a spiritual structure for its continued existence, the white race is dying, failing to reproduce, being displaced by aliens, and offering an inadequate level of resistance to the death of the West.
In actual physical weather/climate seasons, spring follows winter. Can the same hold true for particular peoples and their High Cultures? If civilizational (re)birth will lead to long-term racial survival, should we at least consider the possibilities? Of course, one cannot predict with full accuracy if a civilizational (re)birth will take place, much less the precise form such an event would take. Further, one cannot pre-plan and create a High Culture in the manner of a general formulating a strategy and then leading troops into battle. A High Culture must develop along its own lines, according to factors not entirely within (conscious) human control. However, one can, and should, examine the evidence, consider the possibilities, and to the extent it is possible, encourage those trends leading to a civilizational (re)birth. Further, these trends could, and should, be guided, to the extent possible, in directions that would be most fruitful and most consistent with the nature of our people.
A starting point is to consider our present High Culture, the dying remnants of which we see around us. The so-called “Western” or “Faustian” civilization has been described by Spengler and is summarized thus (emphasis added):
. . . the modern Westerners being Faustian. According to its theories, we are now living in the winter time of the Faustian civilization. His description of the Faustian civilization is one where the populace constantly strives for the unattainable—making Western Man a proud but tragic figure, for while he strives and creates he secretly knows the actual goal will never be reached.
Here we see two defining characteristics of the “Faustian” civilization of the modern (i.e., post-Classical) West: first, a focus on infinity and the unknown, and second, that the striving toward that focus will always be unsuccessful; the objectives of Western Man are always “unattainable.” The second point, and its implications, will be further discussed below. For now, let us accept the Spenglerian model and also accept that we are in the Winter of the Faustian culture. Now, the Spenglerian school, steeped in “stoic acceptance” (“pessimism”) will advise us to accept, and make the most of, our circumstances. The era in which we live in is what it is, and, like a Roman soldier on guard under erupting Vesuvius, we must stand at our post until the end, until all is enveloped in inescapable decay (civilizational entropy, if you will).
But if race and culture are linked, the dissipation of the culture means the destruction of the race. Or does it? The Faustian is not the first High Culture of Europe; it was preceded by the Classical. Spengler and his follower Yockey break with previous cultural interpretations to stress the sharp discontinuity between Classical and Faustian. These are perceived as being two distinct High Cultures, as different from each other as each is to, say, the Egyptian or the Magian.
Therefore, from the same article on Spengler’s work, we read (emphasis added):
Spengler borrows frequently from mathematical philosophy. He holds that the mathematics and art of a civilization reveal its world-view. He notes that in Greek classical mathematics that there are only integers and no real concepts of limits or infinity. Therefore, without a concept of the infinite, all events of the distant past were viewed as equally distant, thus Alexander the Great had no problem declaring himself a descendant of a god. On the other hand, the western world—which has concepts of the zero, the infinite, and the limit—has a historical world-view which places a high amount of importance on exact dates.
Similarly, Revilo Oliver writes (emphasis added):
Spengler identifies as two entirely separate and discrete civilizations the Classical (”Apollonian”), c. 1100 B.C.-A.D. 300, and the Western (”Faustian”), c. A.D. 900-2200. These are the two for which we have the fullest information, and between them Spengler establishes some of his most brilliant synchronisms (e.g., Alexander the Great corresponds to Napoleon). Even a century ago, this dichotomy would have seemed almost mad, for everyone knew and took for granted that whatever might be true of alien cultures, our own was a continuation, or, at least, revival of the Classical. Spengler’s denial of that continuity was the most radical and startling aspect of his historical synthesis, but so great has been his overshadowing influence that it has been accepted by a majority of the many subsequent writers on the philosophy of history, of whom we may mention here only Toynbee, Raven, Bagby, and Brown. (20) The Classical, we are told, was a civilization like the Egyptian, now dead and gone and with no organic connection with our own. . . . Spengler (whom Brown especially follows in this respect) supports his drastic dichotomy by impressively contrasting Graeco-Roman mathematics and technology with our own; from that contrast he deduces differences in the perception of space and time, exhibited particularly in music, and reaches the conclusion that the Classical Weltanschauung was essentially static, desiring and recognizing only a strictly delimited and familiar world, whereas ours is dynamic and exhibits a passionate yearning for the infinite and the unknown. One can advance various objections to the generalizations I have so curtly and inadequately summarized (e.g., is the difference in outlook really greater than that between the “classical” literature of Eighteenth-Century Europe and the Romanticism of the following era?), but the crucial point is whether the differences, which belong to the order that we must call spiritual for want of a better term, (21) are fundamental or epiphenomenal.
I have tended toward the “epiphenomenal” explanation – but in any case, one can agree with Oliver’s overarching conclusion in his various works: either the Classical and Faustian are different yet connected phases of the same Civilization, or, even if completely distinct, Western Man is capable of producing multiple High Cultures. Either way, one can conclude two things: (1) a successor to the Faustian High Culture is possible and has a precedent, and (2) this successor will be intimately connected in important ways to its predecessor (s) (even if Spengler and Yockey would deny this could be possible).
Therefore, either the Classical and Faustian are indeed linked (by a generalized common gene pool, “racial soul,” and Western outlook) or, if they are indeed distinct, they are not completely unconnected, as they derive from a common wellspring or foundation (again, the generalized gene pool, “racial soul,” and Western mindset of greater individualism and empiricism compared to other peoples and cultures). Not only are the Classical and the Faustian in some sense linked but, contrary to Spengler and Yockey–and, indeed, a blasphemy of the Spenglerian school that rejects a linear history–there is a sense of progression, in that the worldview of the Faustian is broader than that of the Classical; indeed, this greater breadth of vision is a defining characteristic of the Faustian. This breadth being manifested in such phenomena as high level technics, and a mass knowledge base of science, history, philosophy and morality-ethics, the foundation is therefore laid for a new High Culture of a vision even broader than that of the Faustian. A Spenglerian would argue that any new High Culture of the West, even if possible (and they may deny this possibility), would be completely disconnected to the “Faustian” aspects of the former, (i.e., present) Western Faustian High Culture. However, I argue that, having being awakened to the universe at large, it is unlikely that the white man would create a new High Culture that would be insular, rejecting the infinite. To the (albeit limited) extent we can predict, or even influence, the development of a new High Culture, a potential direction is one that is not purely “Faustian”–in the sense of striving for the unattainable. Instead, one can project a future High Culture that is based upon the ultimate and successful (eventual) achievement of what was previously considered to be “unattainable.”
Friedrich Nietzsche
I would argue that the Christian foundation of the Faustian High Culture is responsible for the fact that the ultimate goals that Western man strives toward end up being “unattainable” – and secretly known by him to be “unattainable.” The Christian mindset places inherent limits within the mind of Western man, so he is doomed to ultimately fail even if full success is theoretically possible (eventually). After all, the focus of Christianity is God and not Man, it is “salvation” and not overcoming, and it is a focus on “the next world” and not this, our real world. For man to achieve godhood–or to even have that as a goal–is a form of “blasphemy,” it is something that cannot be countenanced. Therefore, ultimate failure must occur, for attainment of the “Faustian” goal (attainment itself would then make the event no longer be truly “Faustian”) is simply not possible in a High Culture based upon Christianity. The full development of Western man has been restrained by an alien religion that has placed shackles on his mind and his soul. Nietzsche well recognized the constraints imposed by (Judeo-) Christianity; in his The Antichrist we find (emphasis added):
Has any one ever clearly understood the celebrated story at the beginning of the Bible–of God’s mortal terror of science? . . . No one, in fact, has understood it. This priest-book par excellence opens, as is fitting, with the great inner difficulty of the priest: he faces only one great danger; ergo, ”God” faces only one great danger.–
The old God, wholly “spirit,” wholly the high-priest, wholly perfect, is promenading his garden: he is bored and trying to kill time. Against boredom even gods struggle in vain. What does he do? He creates man–man is entertaining. . . But then he notices that man is also bored. God’s pity for the only form of distress that invades all paradises knows no bounds: so he forthwith creates other animals. God’s first mistake: to man these other animals were not entertaining–he sought dominion over them; he did not want to be an “animal” himself.–So God created woman. In the act he brought boredom to an end–and also many other things! Woman was the second mistake of God.–”Woman, at bottom, is a serpent, Heva”–every priest knows that; “from woman comes every evil in the world”–every priest knows that, too. Ergo, she is also to blame for science. . . It was through woman that man learned to taste of the tree of knowledge.–What happened? The old God was seized by mortal terror. Man himself had been his greatest blunder; he had created a rival to himself; science makes men godlike–it is all up with priests and gods when man becomes scientific!–Moral: science is the forbidden per se; it alone is forbidden. Science is the first of sins, the germ of all sins, the original sin. This is all there is of morality.–”Thou shalt not know”–the rest follows from that.–God’s mortal terror, however, did not hinder him from being shrewd. How is one to protect one’s self against science? For a long while this was the capital problem. Answer: Out of paradise with man! Happiness, leisure, foster thought–and all thoughts are bad thoughts!–Man must not think.–And so the priest invents distress, death, the mortal dangers of childbirth, all sorts of misery, old age, decrepitude, above all, sickness–nothing but devices for making war on science! The troubles of man don’t allow him to think. . . Nevertheless–how terrible!–, the edifice of knowledge begins to tower aloft, invading heaven, shadowing the gods–what is to be done?--The old God invents war; he separates the peoples; he makes men destroy one another (–the priests have always had need of war….). War–among other things, a great disturber of science !–Incredible! Knowledge, deliverance from the priests, prospers in spite of war.–So the old God comes to his final resolution: “Man has become scientific–there is no help for it: he must be drowned!”
Indeed. If “the meek shall inherit the Earth” there is no place for any human striving for the infinite that is successful, and which places Man on the same plane as God. If meekness, humility, the “humble lamb of God” is the foundational archetype of a culture, then of course infinity and the unknown will always be unattainable. “Thou shalt not know”: it is amazing how much we have achieved despite that, and these remarkable Western achievements coming have occurred–not by coincidence–primarily during the Autumn and Winter periods of the Faustian High Culture. Only when the constraints imposed by the Christian-defined culture have to a large extent dissipated has the a priori acceptance of failure been weakened. The problem is that with a decaying, dying High Culture, this (partial) emancipation from the cult of humility will go for naught. Only a new High Culture built upon the fundamental concept of human transcendence, and on the attainment of infinity/the unknown, will allow Western Man to fulfill his density. The crumbling ruins of the previous High Culture can serve as building blocks for the future, certainly, they can provide inspiration, certainly, and be a source of pride, certainly. But we need to look toward the Future, and not stand guard over a dying, or dead, Past, analogous to Spengler’s Roman soldier.
While I mean no disrespect to anyone’s beliefs, be they Christian or Pagan, I do not see a revival of ancient pagan gods as a forward-thinking improvement over the decay of Faustianism. Replacing Jesus with Thor, in my mind, simply replaces one fantasy-crutch with another. White men should no longer require any exogenous gods, whether new or old; we instead should strive toward godhood for our race. It is time for the white man to grow up and put away the fantasies of childhood, fantasies of gods and external intelligent forces controlling a destiny that should be ours, and ours alone, to mold. The motto of the Classical World was “Know Thyself,” while that of the Faustian Age was a combination of “Thou Shalt Not Know” with “Thou Shalt Try to Know and Thou Shalt Fail.” I propose that the new High Culture of the West have the motto: “Thou Shalt Know and Thou Shalt Overcome.” This will usher in an era in which Western Man unlocks his potential by unlocking the shackles imposed by an assumed inferiority to imaginary gods.
Francis Parker Yockey
The following quote from Yockey’s The Enemy of Europe summarizes the palingenetic objective that we could, if we so wished, strive for:
Our European Mission is to create the Culture-State-Nation-Imperium of the West, and thereby we shall perform such deeds, accomplish such works, and so transform our world that our distant posterity, when they behold the remains of our buildings and ramparts, will tell their grandchildren that on the soil of Europe once dwelt a tribe of gods.
In other words, no imaginary gods. It is Man that will become “God.” In the book The Portable Nietzsche, editor Walter Kaufmann interprets Nietzsche’s “overman” thus:
what is called for is not a super-brute but a human being who has created for himself that unique position in the cosmos that the Bible considered his birthright.
That was going well until that last part – “The Bible.” No, Mr. Kaufman, the Bible does not consider the Overman to be the ultimate birthright of humanity but instead the “last man” as the “prize” instead. It is we who must choose what our “birthright” is, not the wild fantasies of “the Bible.” However, that being so, the rest of the description is sound, if we consider that it is to be applied to the race as a whole and not only to selected individuals within the race. No more “proud, tragic” failure in “striving for the unattainable” in the “Faustian” culture – instead the Overman Culture will be characterized by the proud successful attainment of the infinite. That is what a hopeful individual can project as the new High Culture of the West, with links to the Classical and the Faustian, but surpassing both in the aim and objective of the human spirit. That is what Western Destiny can and should be.
What can we do to get things on the right track?
Although the Jewish author Isaac Asimov may not be popular among many white gentile racial nationalists, his Foundation series can provide a useful analogy here. “The Foundation” was meant to jumpstart a new civilization after the collapse of the “Galactic Empire,” so that the post-collapse “era of barbarism” would be a mere thousand years, instead of 30,000. Facing as we do the collapse of the West through the Winter of the Faustian age, it may be prudent to lay the seeds of a new emergent white, Western civilization for the long term, as we also fight the more short-term and medium-term battles to preserve the white race and save as much of Western Faustian civilization as possible. Without these shorter range objectives, the long term civilizational (re)birth will not be possible. Conversely, without a civilizational (re)birth, long-term white preservationism would be questionable.
So, there are two things that need to be going on here. First is the ongoing struggle for white racial preservationism and to save as much of the Faustian culture as possible, to serve as a knowledge base and building blocks for the new High Culture of the West. Second, an effort must be initiated to begin the process of laying the groundwork for this new High Culture. As indicated above, of course a High Culture is an organic phenomenon that cannot be created in a pre-planned form and artificially imposed on a people. However, it is possible to plant the seeds and to have some choice as to which seeds are planted. And then, we can nurture the seedling as it grows, and as it develops according to its own inherent character. This we can do and this we must do.
This is a serious matter requiring forward-thinking strategy of an extreme visionary character, not something that can be productively “discussed” on “blog threads” or other (typically inane) public forums. It is not something that can occur overnight. This is a long-term, multi-generational project that needs to be undertaken by dedicated individuals who wish to lay the foundation of something great and noble for posterity. This will not be not any “quick fix” whose results may be seen in a decade or two; instead, this is a project that has the potential to influence the course of human history and it must be conducted on that higher level.
Therefore, this essay is simply a call for action and an initial and cursory consideration of the possibilities. If such a project is ever initiated, it should not, and must not, devolve into the mundane “movement” minutiae that many obsess over, nor can it be linked to the more serious, yet short-term, necessary “stop-gap” activism required to save our people and culture today. This is another matter, on another level, entirely.
Many are called; few are chosen. The Future Awaits.
The homosexual agenda targeted at America’s children is literally sickening to read about, not to mention, that it will be signed into law in the very near future.
What has this country come to????? Are Americans this apathetic that they will just sit back and watch as these evil, wicked people in the government place [...]
Jesus: The Jewish Archetype
There are a small number of deluded Gentile fools who try to claim the Nazarene was a Gentile. The following biblical scriptures prove beyond any doubt the Jewishness of the Nazarene, and his relation to the Gentiles. As for the Jewishness of his teachings, see "Christianity and Communism: Jewish Twins."
The Nazarene is a fictitous JEWISH INVENTED ARCHETYPE for Gentiles to slavishly worship. This character is based upon some 18+ crucified Pagan Gods STOLEN and CORRUPTED from GENTILE pantheons! For more information proving the nazarene character is fictitious, click on the links provided at the bottom of this webpage. The Jews themselves know the nazarene is a lie!
Matthew 1: 1 The book of the generation of Jesus Christ, the son of David, the son of Abraham.
Who was Abraham?
Genesis 14:13 And there came one that had escaped, and told Abram the Hebrew; for he dwelt in the plain of Mamre the Amorite, brother of Eshcol, and brother of Aner: and these were confederate with Abram.
Genesis 17:10 This is my covenant, which ye shall keep, between me and you and thy seed after thee; Every man child among you shall be circumcised.
Circumcision was not a popular practice among the Gentiles:
Male Circumcision in the Renaissance:
Europeans, with the exception of the Jews, did not practice male circumcision.
These denunciations of Pharisaic practices have been highly criticized by some writers. They have charged that Jesus and the early church writers presented a false caricature of the Pharisees that is not consistent with what the Jewish sources say about them.
One of the reasons why there may be such sensitivity in this area is that Jesus condemnation was not limited to some antiquarian sect with no relevance for Jewish life today. Of all the various Jewish parties that flourished during the Second Temple, only the Pharisees (along with the quasi-Jewish Samaritans!) survived the devastation of 70 A.D. as an identifiable continuing entity. The reconstructed Judaism of the second and third centuries was, in essence, based on the Pharisaic beliefs and practices of pre-70 A.D. Without apology, modern scholars affirm that Talmudic Judaism and modern Orthodox Judaism are essentially Pharisaism.
Pharisaic Judaism became normative Judaism. Its principal features the synagogue, the rabbi, prayer, Torah study, and belief in the oral law became the modes of religious expression guiding Jewish life ever since. All Jewish life today, therefore, stems from the Pharisaic tradition and derives its central religious characteristics from it.8
The most important of the three were the Pharisees because they are the spiritual fathers of modern Judaism.
Pharisees, Sadducees, and Essenes
Even the Jews of today say that they are descended from the Pharisees. Jesus condemned the Pharisees and their practices.
What more proof do we need?
Judaism — A Transhumanistic Religion of Power
How Judaism is like getting jumped into a gang:
The ritual of getting jumped into a gang goes like this: the group beats the crap out of you, then if they decide you took it well, then they are all your “gang brothers” or whatever. They’re your best friends, and I would imagine a new gang member is “showered” with congratulations.
A Jewish baby boy also goes through the ritual of Punishment/Pain at birth, and then “showered with gifts” at 13 years old. They are made to understand that “membership has its privileges.” Deep in the psyche there is a memory of the extremely painful cutting. This lets them know “who’s the boss.”
Anybody who says babies don’t feel that, and/or they don’t remember it, is deluded. It’s like saying the fish doesn’t feel the hook. It’s a typical “break you down, build you back up,” cycle, not unlike military basic training.
There is a broad concept called “trans-humanism.” I believe the reason that Jewry has surpassed Christendom in global power, is because Jewry has encouraged trans-humanist enhancements in its members, while Christian ministers have feared competition for their collection plates.
What is Transhumanism?
From Wikipedia:
Transhumanism is an international intellectual and cultural movement supporting the use of science and technology to improve human mental and physical characteristics and capacities. The movement regards aspects of the human condition, such as disability, suffering, disease, aging, and involuntary death as unnecessary and undesirable. Transhumanists look to biotechnologies and other emerging technologies for these purposes. Dangers, as well as benefits, are also of concern to the transhumanist movement.
The term “transhumanism” is symbolized by H+ or h+ and is often used as a synonym for “human enhancement”. Although the first known use of the term dates from 1957, the contemporary meaning is a product of the 1980s when futurists in the United States began to organize what has since grown into the transhumanist movement. Transhumanist thinkers predict that human beings may eventually be able to transform themselves into beings with such greatly expanded abilities as to merit the label “posthuman.” Transhumanism is therefore sometimes referred to as “posthumanism” or a form of transformational activism influenced by posthumanist ideals.
The transhumanist vision of a transformed future humanity has attracted many supporters and detractors from a wide range of perspectives. Transhumanism has been described by one critic, Francis Fukuyama, as the world’s most dangerous idea, while one proponent, Ronald Bailey, counters that it is the “movement that epitomizes the most daring, courageous, imaginative, and idealistic aspirations of humanity.”
Arno Breker's "Bereitschaft" ("Readiness")
A very familiar example of trans-humanism is bodybuilding, or physical conditioning in general. This of course was eventually permitted by Christianity, and you had the “muscular Christians.”
My own father was a prime example. He was a YMCA director and all-around athlete, from gymnastics to soccer to skiing to swimming.
However, there was an implicit sense that there were “normal methods” of self-improvement, like the weight room, and then there were the methods of “the weirdos,” the “non-Western” styles of self-improvement, such as the housewives in the leotards doing yoga.
Power is Good, Weakness is Evil
Eventually I became so enamored of the possibility of self improvement that I lost all taboos. Anything that made me more powerful, I decided, was good.
For years I listened to Jay Hughes’ “Change Surfer Radio,” and didn’t realize to what degree I myself was a transhumanist. I dismissed the term as “for weirdos” because it sounded too much like “transsexual.” When Jay Hughes talked about the Terminator movies as extreme examples of transhumanism, it suddenly made sense.
Hughes also talked about “breeding 160 IQ perfect Nordics, and this might not be a good thing for a radically democratic society. Rich people might breed themselves into Aryan overlords.”
Don’t laugh — we already have the technology. All it takes is for someone who isn’t held back by the “implicit Christian minister” wagging his index finger, saying, “that’s too weird.”
The whole aspect of Christianity that says, “Don’t go there,” is why the Middle Ages was “1,000 years without a bath.” Bathing was considered “ungodly,” i.e., “transhumanist.” It was paganistic, unnecessary self-improvement for the pious.
If there is a trigger in your brain that says, “Nah, that’s too weird.” That’s the same impulse that told us not to take a bath for 1,000 years. Dissassemble that implanted, alien circuit and throw it away.
Turn on a new circuit, one that’s already in your brain. It’s the one that says, “anything that gives me power, is good.”
The dominance of the current order depends on “implicit Christianity” that’s been implanted in us since Sunday school. It’s that in you which shrinks from the Will to Power, from a fanatic, obsessive striving for dominance.
If words like “power, fanatic, obsessive, dominance” bother you, that’s the implicit Christian minister in the back of your head. Turn him off. Imagine in your mind that he’s wagging his finger at you. Laugh at him, and then take him like a rag doll and throw him out of your brain.
In his place, put Arnold Schwarzenegger saying in his Austrian accent, “That which makes me more powerful, is good. That which weakens me, is bad.”
Learn from the Enemy
I figured this out from studying the enemy. Leftist Jews have taken great advantage of this “implicit Christian” impulse, even while practicing transhumanism and a religion of power themselves. Their power lies in controlling us.
This doesn’t mean someone like Tim Wise doesn’t “believe” in what he preaches. He has to. To hypnotize someone, you have to believe it yourself. He’s able to believe in something, that he knows is a “beneficial fraud,” or a “noble lie.”
Let us ask what Tim Wise thinks is “bad.” From the paragraph below we see “dominance” on the part of Whites is his “ultimate evil.” Good whites will “roll over and show their belly.” Good Jews do the opposite, of course.
Good (Christian) whites avoid that “weird transhumanism” stuff. Good (Christian) whites don’t want to “dominate” because we’re all equal now. Even secular liberal types claim that seeking dominance just “perpetuates the cycle of dominance.” Well, duh. It’s not going away. Anybody who voluntary gives up striving for dominance is going to end up a slave . . . literally. Even if they are able to live all peaceful and hippie now in the woods of Oregon, if we get an ANC style colored government in the US, there will be as much peace for them as there is for the Whites of the former Rhodesia.
If Rhodesia/Zimbabwe is a bad outcome, then anything that leads to that is bad, or perhaps downright evil. Volunteering to submit is EVIL. It’s the wrong decision, in every way. The Christian minister, or the Tim Wise, telling you to “give up your power,” is your executioner.
So what is good? Let’s ask Arnold again:
“That which makes me more powerful, is good. That which weakens me, is bad.”
I watch Jews. I saw how they live in Boston. They are really into everything that Christians were discouraged from doing. Self-enhancement, selfishness, collective-mindedness. Sure they are a bunch of neurotics, but if you laugh at Woody Allen, you’re missing the Jew who’s taken over your culture. I’m sure as hell not laughing.
We can learn from the enemy, what ideals to have, by seeing what they fear. Tim Wise gave away the store when he wrote the below paragraph, my comments in parentheses:
http://www.laprogressive.com/rankism/obama-black-voters-and-the-myth-of-reverse-racism/
But for members of groups that have not been subordinated to “think with their skin” or their racial identity is quite a bit different, and more problematic. For dominant group members to engage in racial bonding only makes sense as a way to maintain dominance [to maintain a sane society where 14 year old white girls don't get pregnant or infected with HIV from black males]. It can’t be about “getting a piece of the pie,” since such persons already have access to it, and pieces galore; rather, it has to be about preventing others from getting their [pieces of white flesh], from taking parts of the pie to which the dominant group had come to feel entitled (of course. We own ourselves as a Racial Family. No other races may claim a piece of us) It is not to seek a place at the table, but to seek to secure the table you already have from the intrusion of others [just as we prevent intrusion into our own homes, so we prevent intrusion into our gene pool and the piece of the Planet Earth our race needs to survive]. White bonding, in other words, amounts to racism because it is redundant: it amounts to having those who are already largely in control, secure that control in perpetuity. It results in the maintenance of racial inequity [Blaming us for inequalities in natural endownment], unequal opportunity and massive disparities in access and life chances [Welcome to Planet Earth]. Black and brown bonding, on the other hand, is about gaining access [and sustaining Jewish Dominance as the gate-openers for the blacks and browns and rulers over whites], securing a spot, and collectively lifting up members of subordinated communities to a place where they can compete as equals with those who have always been in charge [can they compete as equals if they aren't equals?]. There is nothing supremacist or racist about that at all, unless one presumes that–as Jesse Jackson and others have long said–there is no fundamental difference between a “Welcome” mat and a “No Trespassing” sign [synagogues and Jewish yeshiva schools display the latter].
Weakness . . . in us . . . is evil. Weakness leads to Zimbabwe. It leads to Nushawn Williams infecting a dozen white teenaged girls with AIDS and impregnating 6 of them, and of course this has happened a million times over since 1997.
To overcome our implanted programming, our “implicit Christianity,” we have to kill the Christian minister in our subconscious, and replace him with a religion of power.
The Jewish rabbi in the back of the head of every Jew is always saying, “Is it good for the Jews?”
We need a new superego, a new divine-consciousness, that says Yes to power and dominance, rather than shrinking from it like a coward. We must end the vestigial “thousand years without a bath” thinking and cultivate a transhumanist religion of power.
Rest in Peace, Scott Patrick Wilson
The community of Wellington was the scene of a horrific murder where a Jewish billionaire, who is an alleged cocaine addict, and a drinker, killed a young boy. Abe Goodman blew a stop sign, hit the side rear of another car which spun into a canal, and Goodman fled, as the young man drowned.
Now, the Christian community wants answers to the party that night at the ‘Sodom and Gomorrah’ polo club, and the Zionists refuse to answer questions.
Palm Beach Billionaire Killer Is A Cocaine Addict
John Goodman, the billionaire owner of the International Polo Club Palm Beach was involved in a ‘Hit and run’ on a 23 year old Christian student.
His drug habit caused such havoc on his family that his ex-wife, Carroll Goodman, told a Houston court during the couples divorce in 2008 that she feared for the safety of their two children.
The Polo Crowd Stands Behind Their Fellow Zionist
This polo club is in the heart of the super rich Palm Beach Jewish crowd. The clubhouse parties are noted for New Yorkers, cocaine, and white shisksas hoping to land a rich Bubelah.
The core crowd at the party that John Goodman attended before he hit the young man refuse to talk.
23 Year Old Christian Student
Scott Patrick Wilson, 23, was a young engineer, recently graduated from college and driving home for his sister’s birthday. Goodman hit him, and left the scene, and the young man drowned.
Read more
http://judicial-inc.biz/7_6_f_ather_…supplement.htm
Mother of Wellington college grad killed in crash: ‘He died with a pure heart’
EntityCube – Scott Patrick Wilson
Car driven by International Polo founder kills 23-year-old in Wellington crash; alcohol suspected
EXPLODING THE "CHOSEN PEOPLE" MYTH
Christ or Communism Which Will It Be
By LT. Colonel Gordon "Jack" Mohr (1916 – 2003)
HAVE YOU ever wondered why, in the twentieth century, when all subjects can be intelligently examined, there is only one subject that remains forbidden fruit? You can discuss Communism, sex, Protestantism, Catholicism, Mohammedanism or Metaphysics, quite freely, but it is considered not only bad manners, but downright sinful to discuss the Jewish situation.
If you want information on the Mormons, you can go to most any bookstore and purchase The Book of Mormon, The Doctrine of The Covenants, or The Pearl of Great Price. If you wish to learn more about Christian Science, you can purchase Science and Health by Mary Baker Eddy. If you wish to discuss the "I Am" movement, the books of Dr. Ballard are available. You can even find out about the religion of the Muslims, by purchasing a copy of the Koran, translated into English.
There is not one single existing faith that you cannot study, with the exception of Judaism. (Jewish Babylonian Talmudism) But if you try and find out what the Jews believe, an immediate screen of secrecy is drawn and, if you try and penetrate this, you are in trouble. If you don’t believe this, go to some Jewish bookstore and try to acquire the 63 volumes of the Talmud, which is the Jewish Bible. You are either routed to a limited edition, some excerpts, or are told that it is forbidden for a NON-Jew to have it. In fact, the Talmud itself boldly states that a NON-Jew should be put to death if he reads the Talmud. In the Sanhedrin Volume (59A), page 400, we read:
"Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance, it is OUR inheritance, not theirs (NON-Jews)."
The second tumult, which arises when you want to discuss the Jews, is that you, as a Christian, must always praise them and never say anything which is critical about what they say, write, or do, because if you do, God will curse you. In other words, you can criticize a Catholic for what he believes; you can say that a Mormon is wrong, or a Jehovah Witness, or a Christian Scientist, or a Baptist, or any other sect, except a Jew. That is "verboten!" This superstitious nonsense has been sown so deeply in the minds of most Christians, especially Fundamentalists, that they fear to raise a single objection, or question anything the Jews do.
The leaders of great, nation-wide Christian Movements, such as the Moral Majority, who will stand behind their pulpits and appear on national television, to thunder against the evils of corruption in government, the liquor industry, the murder of unborn babies by abortion, pornographic literature on our news stands, sex education in the school, and other assorted ills; these men are afraid, or refuse to mention publicly, that it is Jewish promoters who are behind most of these ills they are fighting.
I have had outstanding Fundamentalist leaders who admitted to me in private that they know that Jews control the media; that they put out the anti-Christian filth of Hollywood; that they operate the dope and prostitution rackets; that Jewish doctors man the abortion centers of America. They will admit this in private, but I have yet to see one with "guts" enough to admit this publicly from their pulpits and to tell their parishioners that Jews are behind these troubles. For you see, once again the bugaboo arises:
"I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curses thee." (Genesis 12:3.)
I have often wondered why our modern-day clergy has propounded the idea that Christians must bless those who curse the very name of our Lord and who, by their own confession, are the bitterest enemies of Christianity. This seems to me to be treason in the best Constitutional definition of this crime: "Giving them aid and comfort; adhering to their enemy." I have often wondered why Christians must bless those who seek to take Bibles and prayer out of our schools and stop the singing of Christmas carols. It doesn’t make very much sense!
It is "common sense" to believe that God will place a blessing upon those who have organized to destroy the teachings of His blessed Son? Does it make sense to believe that God will bless those who are dedicated to the destruction of the Church for which He died? Yet this grave misconception is taught to millions of unsuspecting, gullible Christians and is flung in the face of those of us who have been honest enough to study the subject and know whereof we speak.
When I first came to an understanding of this vital subject, it became necessary for me to leave my church, for my pastor accuses me of being an apostate. My ideas about the fundamentals of the faith have not changed; my sin was that I had my eyes opened to the Satanic doctrine that the Jews are His Chosen People, therefore anything they do is all right and must be accepted.
Our ministers tell us that only those nations which bless the Jews will prosper. But you don’t have to be much of an historian, or look very deeply into modern history to put the lie to this myth. The nations of both ancient and modern times, which have been destroyed, have been destroyed because they turned their backs on God and His laws. They have rotted out from within, by moral and spiritual subversion, often aided and abetted by the Jews, and have been destroyed, long before the barbarians swarmed over their walls, or battered down their gates. In Psalm 33:12 we read:
"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom He hath chosen for His own inheritance."
Who is this God referred to as "the Lord?" It is none other than Jesus Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, who is spoken of in John 14:6:
"I am the way, the truth and the life: NO MAN cometh unto the Father, but by Me."
How can it be any plainer? No man, be he Jew, Gentile, Mohammedan, Hindu – no one, can reach God, unless they first come to Him through Jesus Christ.
Many nations in the history of the world have prospered, but every one, without fail, that has allowed the Jews to enter with their Talmudic teachings, have been demoralized and destroyed.Once the evil of Talmudic teachings begins to rot the morality of a country; once the "money changers" get in control of a nation’s finances, then that country is on the "downhill slide" to oblivion. Don’t argue with me about this, look at history!
England has declined as an Empire, ever since they allowed the influx of Jewish immigrants and allowed them to seek places of importance in finance and government. They tell us that America has been blessed by God, because we were kind to the Jews, yet our moments of greatest decline have come since we recognized the Israeli State as a nation and allowed Jewish control in our finances and government. This has been the constant lesson of history.
If this blessing should have been upon any nation or ruler, it should have fallen on Napoleon. He forced people in many communities to participate in Jewish holidays and caused the erection of synagogues, at taxpayer expense in many cities which his armies captured. Yet he and his army were destroyed; he was betrayed as always, by the people he had tried to befriend.
According to the teaching of many pastors, the Soviet Union should have been blessed above any nation on the earth, for they are the only known nation which has forbidden "anti-Semitism," by law. A quotation from the Daily Worker in 1939 said:
"In the USSR, anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the USSR, active anti-Semites are punished with death."
Is this law so strange, when you consider that more than 90% of the top Communist leaders have been and still are Jews?
Yet Russia has not been blessed. Oh, they have a tough military machine, built up with the blood of the Russian people. They scare the daylights out of the "milquetoasts" in our churches and government, but they are beset by constant internal troubles, which could destroy them overnight. They can control their vast, imperial empire, only through fear and terror.
The second lie, which throws fear into the hearts of anyone who seeks to become enlightened concerning the position of the Jews in the world, is the bugaboo of "anti-Semitism." Have you ever stopped to ask yourself, "Who is a Semite?" History proves that the Semites descended from Noah’s son Shem. This takes in the white, Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and related people. However, it does not include the people who call themselves Jews. They are the greatest "anti-Semites" of all time, since they constantly harass the true descendants of Abraham, the Arabs, whose land they have stolen. Yet no one would think of calling a Jew "anti-Semitic" because he harasses an Arab.
The third lie, which has been sold to American Christians by the Jewish propagandists, is that our heritage is "Judeo-Christian"; in other words, that Christianity is a direct derivative of Judaism. The New Testament is not now, nor ever has been a product of Judaism. Judaism is built on the Talmud, which is the antithesis of the Bible. Most of our pastors know this. Biblical Christianity is built on the teachings of Jesus Christ and Divine revelation as it was given to His Apostles. It has absolutely nothing in common with Judaism as anyone can see, who has taken the time and effort to read any of the Talmud.
Jesus Christ, speaking to the Judaic religious leaders of His day in Matthew 15:9, and quoting from the Prophet Isaiah said:
"In vain they do worship Me [God], teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
In Mark 7:13, Christ again harshly criticizes the Pharisees, accusing them of "Make the word of God of none effect through your traditions." This same general idea is carried over in the teachings of the Apostle Paul. He warned the church at Colossae (Col. 2:22):
"Which all are to perish with the using; after the commandments and doctrines of men."
Again in 1st Timothy 4:1, Paul warned of a time which will come on this earth, when men will depart from sound doctrine to "give heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils." Oh how the fundamental preachers love this text, but none of them will tell their parishioners that this is what we find in the Jewish Talmudic teachings; they are heavily laced with the occult, in direct disobedience to the instruction of God, as given to Moses.
In Titus 1:14, Paul gives us a final warning about Jewish doctrine, when he says:
"Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."
So you see, my friends, if a Christian is honest, there is no way you can truthfully use the term "Judeo-Christian." They are at opposite ends of the pole. The Old Testament was compiled by Holy men of God who were Israelites. They believed in the one God, as shown in Isaiah 45:5:
"I am the Lord, and there is none . . . beside Me!"
They looked forward to the coming Redeemer of Israel, the Savior of the Christians. The Holy men of God wrote the sacred Book we call the Bible, as they were moved by the Spirit of God. The Old Testament is therefore the product of God, working through His servants, the prophets. Christianity predates the Jewish religion, for this came into being during the Babylonian captivity, when Israelites got away from God and brought back to Jerusalem a heathen book called the Talmud.
The Judaism of today is not the Law and the Prophets of the Old Testament, but the heathen occult religion of ancient Babylon.The Talmud, therefore, contradicts the teachings of Moses in almost every aspect. Moses was a Christian. This can be seen in a careful reading of Hebrews 11:24-26:
"By faith [the same faith which saves men and women in the Twentieth Century] Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter; choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season: Esteeming the reproach of Christ [notice this part very carefully,] esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward."
But you may say: "Abraham and Moses were Jews; our pastor teaches this all the time." Oh, my friend, I beg to differ with you. They were not Jews. This term was not used until 2nd Kings 16:6, more than 1100 years after the death of Abraham and 700 years after the death of Moses. To call these men Jews is to engage in intellectual dishonesty. The Jewish writer, Benjamin Freedman, writing in 1954 to Dr. David Goldstein, a Jew who had been converted to Catholicism and who had become outstanding in his defense of the Catholic faith, said:
"It is a well-known fact that many counterfeit recent conversions [that is, of Jews to Christianity] have often proved hut infiltrations of latent traitors with treasonable intentions."
In one place in the Talmud, I forget where at the moment, Jews are advised to "become Christians (or whatever) for the sake of infiltrating their ranks." Then Mr. Freedman goes on to say:
"The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years. . . When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in a free world, the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of the end."
Freedman then goes on to show how the Christian faith has been put on the defensive throughout the world and mentions that a conspiracy is underway to destroy this faith. He goes on to prove to any honest mind that this is a Jewish conspiracy.
It is unfortunate, indeed, that Christian clergy seem to be ignorant, or apathetic to this plot to destroy everything they say they stand for as Christians. In fact, in many instances, they stand behind their pulpits and defend and support the very people who are pledged to destroy them.
There is no doubt in my mind that thousands of Christian pastors are deeply disturbed by the mysterious pressures from above, which often prevent them from exercising sound judgment. One outstanding Fundamentalist pastor, a leader in the Moral Majority, recently admitted to me:
"I am deeply disturbed by the Jewish influence behind the efforts to destroy the Moral Majority, even though we have been strongly pro-Jewish. But all the great Bible scholars and preachers of the Twentieth Century have said they were God’s Chosen People, so I will have to go along with them."
God have mercy oh us when we use this as the criteria for whether we are right or wrong!
The greatest spiritual teacher of all time, our Lord Jesus Christ, spoke to the Jewish religious leaders of His time in no uncertain terms in John 8:44. He said:
"Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, be speaks of his own; for be is a liar, and the father of it."
Then he goes on in verse 47, speaking to the Pharisees once more:
"He that is of God bears God’s words: you therefore hear them not, BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT OF GOD."
Does this sound much like "Chosen People" theology to you? These same Jews had already admitted they were not Israelites in verse 33, when they told Jesus:
"We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man."
If they had been true Israelites, they could not have said this, since any Bible scholar knows the Israelites spent over 400 years in bondage in Egypt. Yet their leaders told Jesus: "We have never been in bondage to any man." In John 10:26-28, Jesus spoke again to a crowd of Jewish hypocrites:
"You believe not, because You ARE NOT OF MY SHEEP . . . My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: and I give unto them eternal life; and they will never perish."
Then in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, we hear the final word of our Lord concerning these pseudo-Israelites, as He warns the church at Smyrna concerning them. He warns of:
"The blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
How can our preachers designate these blasphemers, whom Christ has cursed as "God’s Chosen People"?
Most of the confusion in the minds of Christians is unwarranted and unjustified. It would not exist if the Christian clergy had not aided and abetted the deceptions responsible for it. Many clergymen are allies with their enemies and it is no wonder that we see spiritual sabotage on every hand. It is no wonder that millions of potential "front line" soldiers for Jesus Christ have become spiritual cowards; who hide in their spiritual foxholes, praying for Christ to return and rapture them out of the mess they are responsible for.
I’m convinced that many in this category will be in for the "shock of their lives," for they will be so tightly zipped up in their "shroud of self-righteousness" that they will not get unzipped in time to go with their Master when He does come. Remember how Jesus once said:
"Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord! Lord! will enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which Is in heaven."
The will of God goes a lot farther than knocking on doors and inviting someone to attend church; it goes farther than telling them about the love of God and the way to salvation. It means "front line duty" in the battle that rages.
To stop this spiritual surrender, we are going to have to have an "about face" on the part of our clergy. Christian organizations, such as the Moral Majority, will never reach their full potential, until their leaders will willingly and honestly point out who their enemies really are.
Mr. Freedman puts his finger squarely on one of the major church problems, when he tells Dr. Goldstein:
"The utterances by the Christian clergy, which confuses Christians the most, is the constantly repeated utterance that ‘Jesus was a Jew.’ This appears to be your favorite theme. It is a misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact. . . . Informed, intelligent Christians, cannot reconcile this unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of facts."
Most competent Bible historians will admit that at no time in the new Testament is Jesus ever called a Jew and that, during His sojourn on earth, He was called a "Judean" by His contemporaries. The great Hebrew historian, Josephus, wrote many times concerning Jesus, but never once called Him a Jew. The church historian, Theoplylact, writing in 1080 A.D. says:
"The city of the Judeans was taken, and the wrath of God was kindled against them: as also Josephus witnesses, that this came upon them on the account of the death of Jesus."
When Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judea, crucified Jesus, he had inscribed on the cross the Latin words: "lesus Nazarenous Rex ludeorum." He was expressing his sarcasm for the Judean religious leaders who had pressured him into executing a man he knew was innocent. Authorities on Latin will tell you this inscription means: "Jesus the Nazarene, ruler of the Judeans." By no stretch of the imagination does this read: "King of the Jews," and it was NOT so translated in the 1611 printing of the King James Version of the Bible.
During His lifetime, Christ was never known as the "King of the Jews." Pilate knew that Jesus had been denied by the religious leaders of these people we now call Jews and that they were responsible for the false testimony they had brought against Him. Christ was crucified because it was politically expedient for Pilate to do so, not because of any guilt on His part. With the exception of a few of His followers, most of the Judeans abhorred His teachings. There were only 120 faithful ones in the "upper room" on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 1:15).
The fact that Jesus was never called a Jew, or was known by this name, cannot be erased by the "wishful thinking" of our theologians, no matter how hard they try to back the Jews. There is no factual foundation in history or theology, which would allow the word used by Pilate to describe Jesus as a Jew. The Greek word is "budais;" the Latin "Iudaeus," and the English translation can be nothing but "Judean." There is no way you can come up with a religious connotation for this word. During the time of Christ, at no place in the world, was there a religion known as "Jewish."
It is an acknowledged fact that the word "Jew" did not appear in the English language until 1775. Prior to that time, it did not exist in any language. It was introduced into the English language in a play written by an English playwright named Sheridan. It was unknown to Shakespeare and, as I mentioned, to the translators of the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Contrary to popular opinion, Shakespeare wrote in his "Merchant of Venice," (V. III, i. 61) "I am an Iewe: hath not an Iewe eyes."
To go back a bit further, the word "Jew" does not appear in the 1582 version of the Douay Bible, the official translation of the Roman Catholic church. But it does in both that version and the King James Version, when they were revised later in the 18th Century.
The intellectual dishonesty of our clergy comes when they use the word "Jew" as a religious term, for this is a rank misrepresentation. The secondary meaning of the word "Jew" today has as little relationship to its original, as the word "camel" has to the cigarette which bears its name. It is the secondary meaning of the word "Jew" which has been used to confuse Christians. We should demand that our clergy be absolutely honest in the pulpit, not only in their use of the Word of God, but also in other matters. When the pulpits of Christian churches become a "propaganda platform" for the worst enemy of Christianity, then Christianity is in deep trouble.
It is a fact, proven from both the Scriptures and history, that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus, was not the race, nationality and culture of the self-styled Jews of this 20th Century. There are very few so-called Jews, who can trace their bloodlines back to Abraham. The Jewish writer, Alfred Lilienthal, in his book, The Controversy of Zion, states:
"I have no doubt that some of my Christian readers have as much right to the land of Palestine as Menachem Begin."
. It should become obvious to any honest student of history that those people who call themselves "Jews" have spent countless millions of dollars to manufacture the fiction that "Jesus was a Jew," and that the Judeans of His time can be identified with the Jews of today, and that the Christian religion is an offshoot of JudaismThis is blasphemy, straight from the "pits of hell."
Jesus did not practice the "religion of the Jews." He abhorred it. The religious beliefs taught in the synagogues of Judea during Christ’s lifetime were not the religion of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses. It was a heathen religious belief known as Pharisaism, which was soundly condemned by our Lord on many occasions. As I have already shown, from Scriptural sources, Jesus condemned these as being "children of Satan."
The eminent Jewish Rabbi, Louis Finkeistein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, in the Foreword of his first edition, The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith, says on p.21:
"Judaism . . . Pharisaism . . . Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives, unaltered."
In other words, the Jewish rabbinate of the 1980′s is the same religious crowd to which Jesus spoke in Matthew 12: 34, when He said:
"O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things?"
The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus’ time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer, "consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries before the birth of Jesus."
Another well-known Rabbi, Michael Rodkinson, in his book, The History of the Talmud, wrote:
"The source from which Jesus of Nazareth drew the teachings which enabled Him to revolutionize the world . . . is the Talmud . . . the written form of that which, in the times of Jesus, was called the tradition of the elders."
But the Word of God gives the lie to this statement. In Mark 7:13, Jesus snid to the Pharisees:
"You make the Word of God of none effect through your traditions.”
So Jesus’ teaching could not have possibly come from this blasphemous book.
Are you naive enough to believe that a religious book which encourages incest, such as the Sanhedrin volume of the Talmud does, or unnatural intercourse; or rape of non-Jews; or bestiality, as found in this filthy volume; do you believe this could be the basis of Jesus’ teaching? If you do, then you are guilty of the vilest form of blasphemy. Are you willing to believe that statements found in the Talmud, such as those which follow, are the basis for Christianity? Listen closely, I will give you chapter and verse:
KALLAH, lb, (18b) – "Jesus was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation."
SCABBATH XIV – "Jesus is referred to as the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish prostitute."
SANHEDRIN, 103a – "This passage suggests that Christ corrupted His morals and dishonored Himself."
SANHEDRIN, 107b – "This passage states that Christ seduced and destroyed Israel."
HILKOTH MELAKHIM – Suggests that Christians sin by worshipping Jesus Christ.
HILKOTH MAAKHALOTH – This states that Christians are idolaters.
ORACH CHAIIM (20, 2) – Says that Christians disguise themselves as Jews in order to kill them.
ABHODAH ZORAH (1 Sb) – Suggests that Christians have sex relations with animals.
CHAGIGAH, (1 Sb) – States that a Jew is considered to be good in the eyes of God, in spite of any sins he may commit.
BABHA KAMA (1 13b) – States that the name of God is not profaned, if a Jew lies to a Christian.
And on and on, and on it goes, for 63 volumes of filth and blasphemy. This is what the Jews are taught in their synagogues. Do any of you Christians reading these words, believe the Christian religion got its start from this kind of blasphemy? This is what your pastor teaches, when he tells you that we have a Judeo-Christian culture.
If I had the time, I could cover several hundred pages, proving that 90% or more of the people in the world today, who go by the name of Jew, do not have one drop of Abraham’s blood in their veins and that none of the their ancestors ever placed foot on the ground of Palestine. Most of the Eastern Jews came from a completely heathen background, a heathen tribe called the Khazars of Western Russia. They were not Semites, but were Turco-Mongoloid. They were converted to Judaism en masse in the 7th Century. If you want further Jewish confirmation of this, I suggest you read Vol. IV, pages 1 to 5 in the Jewish Encyclopaedia.
Most Americans, especially those who go by the name Christian, are deeply disturbed by our economic collapse. But have you been honest enough to recognize that our money system in the United States has been under the control of evil, International Jewish bankers since the Civil War? Benjamin Franklin, addressing the First Continental Congress in 1789, warned them:
"Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews from our shores, in less than a hundred years, every man, woman and child will be toiling in the fields as slaves to the Jewish debt money system."
His timing was off a bit, but otherwise he was correct. Our monetary system today is controlled by the Federal Reserve System, a Marxist principle which was slipped into our Constitution in 1913, at the instigation of the International Jewish bankers. Now this nation is in hock, up to its ears, to this same ungodly crowd; they could ruin us financially, at any time, with the snap of their fingers.
As a Christian, are you not grieved at the subversion of our youth and the degeneration of our nation’s morals? You should be! If you are a member of the clergy, you should be even more concerned, for you have been called to be "watchmen on the walls" of this nation, to warn them at the approach of danger (see Ezekiel 33:1-3). Have you heeded this call? Have you told your people the whole truth, or are you like those pastors of Jeremiah’s time (6:14) who cry: "Peace! peace! when there is no peace!"?
Too often today, American pastors have become "male prostitutes" for the International Zionists. Thousands of these "pseudo-pastors" are pandering to self-styled Jewish interests, as they literally sell this country "down the river," into the hands of those who will destroy Christianity and make us slaves.
I do not advocate hatred for the Jews, as some do. I believe that many of the "rank and file" Jews in America do not understand the plotting of their international leaders. Some do, and have been violently opposed to it! But I do say that we cannot, we must not allow the International Jews to control our government, our economics, our media and our churches, as they do today. Probably our first priority must be to get rid of the false prophets who stand in our pulpits crying: "It is your Christian duty to support the Jews; they are God’s Chosen Ones." God forbid!
Now, as during the Revolutionary War, our motto needs to be: "Tonight, put only Americans on guard!" Let’s take our country out of the greedy clutches of the international leeches. Let’s once again raise the flag of Jesus Christ over this nation. Let’s recognize Anglo-Saxon and kindred Christian Americans for what they are: the people who have been ordained to glorify Christ’s name. Then, with this knowledge, let us go out to battle with the enemy: for in His strength, we can conquer every foe and be free again.
Let us once more remember those stirring words, from the stanza of "The Battle Hymn of the Republic," which have been removed from our song books:
"I have read a fiery Gospel,
Writ in burnished rows of steel,
As ye deal with my condemners,
So with you my grace will deal.
Let the hero born of woman,
Crush the Serpent with His heel,
Since God is marching on!"
Colonel Jack Mohr (1916 – 2003)
FROM:
EXPLODING THE CHOSEN PEOPLE MYTH
The Most Monstrous MEME in All History INCOG MAN: Sick of all the BS…
http://www.biblestudysite.com/factsarefacts.htm
Israel’s Identity: It Matters! – Mission to Israel
God’s Covenant People, Yesterday, Today & Forever – Table of Contents – Mission to Israel
EXPLODING THE "CHOSEN PEOPLE" MYTH
Christ or Communism Which Will It Be
By LT. Colonel Gordon "Jack" Mohr (1916 – 2003)
HAVE YOU ever wondered why, in the twentieth (21st) century, when all subjects can be intelligently examined, there is only one subject that remains forbidden fruit? You can discuss Communism, sex, Protestantism, Catholicism, Mohammedanism or Metaphysics, quite freely, but it is considered not only bad manners, but downright sinful to discuss the Jewish situation.
If you want information on the Mormons, you can go to most any bookstore and purchase The Book of Mormon, The Doctrine of The Covenants, or The Pearl of Great Price. If you wish to learn more about Christian Science, you can purchase Science and Health by Mary Baker Eddy. If you wish to discuss the "I Am" movement, the books of Dr. Ballard are available. You can even find out about the religion of the Muslims, by purchasing a copy of the Koran, translated into English.
There is not one single existing faith that you cannot study, with the exception of Judaism. (Jewish Babylonian Talmudism) But if you try and find out what the Jews believe, an immediate screen of secrecy is drawn and, if you try and penetrate this, you are in trouble. If you don’t believe this, go to some Jewish bookstore and try to acquire the 63 volumes of the Talmud, which is the Jewish Bible. You are either routed to a limited edition, some excerpts, or are told that it is forbidden for a NON-Jew to have it. In fact, the Talmud itself boldly states that a NON-Jew should be put to death if he reads the Talmud. In the Sanhedrin Volume (59A), page 400, we read:
"Moses commanded us a law for an inheritance, it is OUR inheritance, not theirs (NON-Jews)."
The second tumult, which arises when you want to discuss the Jews, is that you, as a Christian, must always praise them and never say anything which is critical about what they say, write, or do, because if you do, God will curse you. In other words, you can criticize a Catholic for what he believes; you can say that a Mormon is wrong, or a Jehovah Witness, or a Christian Scientist, or a Baptist, or any other sect, except a Jew. That is "verboten!" This superstitious nonsense has been sown so deeply in the minds of most Christians, especially Fundamentalists, that they fear to raise a single objection, or question anything the Jews do.
The leaders of great, nation-wide Christian Movements, such as the Moral Majority, who will stand behind their pulpits and appear on national television, to thunder against the evils of corruption in government, the liquor industry, the murder of unborn babies by abortion, pornographic literature on our news stands, sex education in the school, and other assorted ills; these men are afraid, or refuse to mention publicly, that it is Jewish promoters who are behind most of these ills they are fighting.
I have had outstanding Fundamentalist leaders who admitted to me in private that they know that Jews control the media; that they put out the anti-Christian filth of Hollywood; that they operate the dope and prostitution rackets; that Jewish doctors man the abortion centers of America. They will admit this in private, but I have yet to see one with "guts" enough to admit this publicly from their pulpits and to tell their parishioners that Jews are behind these troubles. For you see, once again the bugaboo arises:
"I will bless them that bless thee, and curse him that curses thee." (Genesis 12:3.)
I have often wondered why our modern-day clergy has propounded the idea that Christians must bless those who curse the very name of our Lord and who, by their own confession, are the bitterest enemies of Christianity. This seems to me to be treason in the best Constitutional definition of this crime: "Giving them aid and comfort; adhering to their enemy." I have often wondered why Christians must bless those who seek to take Bibles and prayer out of our schools and stop the singing of Christmas carols. It doesn’t make very much sense!
It is "common sense" to believe that God will place a blessing upon those who have organized to destroy the teachings of His blessed Son? Does it make sense to believe that God will bless those who are dedicated to the destruction of the Church for which He died? Yet this grave misconception is taught to millions of unsuspecting, gullible Christians and is flung in the face of those of us who have been honest enough to study the subject and know whereof we speak.
When I first came to an understanding of this vital subject, it became necessary for me to leave my church, for my pastor accuses me of being an apostate. My ideas about the fundamentals of the faith have not changed; my sin was that I had my eyes opened to the Satanic doctrine that the Jews are His Chosen People, therefore anything they do is all right and must be accepted.
Our ministers tell us that only those nations which bless the Jews will prosper. But you don’t have to be much of an historian, or look very deeply into modern history to put the lie to this myth. The nations of both ancient and modern times, which have been destroyed, have been destroyed because they turned their backs on God and His laws. They have rotted out from within, by moral and spiritual subversion, often aided and abetted by the Jews, and have been destroyed, long before the barbarians swarmed over their walls, or battered down their gates. In Psalm 33:12 we read:
"Blessed is the nation whose God is the Lord; and the people whom He hath chosen for His own inheritance."
Who is this God referred to as "the Lord?" It is none other than Jesus Christ, the King of Kings, and Lord of Lords, who is spoken of in John 14:6:
"I am the way, the truth and the life: NO MAN cometh unto the Father, but by Me."
How can it be any plainer? No man, be he Jew, Gentile, Mohammedan, Hindu – no one, can reach God, unless they first come to Him through Jesus Christ.
Many nations in the history of the world have prospered, but every one, without fail, that has allowed the Jews to enter with their Talmudic teachings, have been demoralized and destroyed.Once the evil of Talmudic teachings begins to rot the morality of a country; once the "money changers" get in control of a nation’s finances, then that country is on the "downhill slide" to oblivion. Don’t argue with me about this, look at history!
England has declined as an Empire, ever since they allowed the influx of Jewish immigrants and allowed them to seek places of importance in finance and government. They tell us that America has been blessed by God, because we were kind to the Jews, yet our moments of greatest decline have come since we recognized the Israeli State as a nation and allowed Jewish control in our finances and government. This has been the constant lesson of history.
If this blessing should have been upon any nation or ruler, it should have fallen on Napoleon. He forced people in many communities to participate in Jewish holidays and caused the erection of synagogues, at taxpayer expense in many cities which his armies captured. Yet he and his army were destroyed; he was betrayed as always, by the people he had tried to befriend.
According to the teaching of many pastors, the Soviet Union should have been blessed above any nation on the earth, for they are the only known nation which has forbidden "anti-Semitism," by law. A quotation from the Daily Worker in 1939 said:
"In the USSR, anti-Semitism is strictly prosecuted as a phenomenon profoundly hostile to the Soviet system. According to the laws of the USSR, active anti-Semites are punished with death."
Is this law so strange, when you consider that more than 90% of the top Communist leaders have been and still are Jews?
Yet Russia has not been blessed. Oh, they have a tough military machine, built up with the blood of the Russian people. They scare the daylights out of the "milquetoasts" in our churches and government, but they are beset by constant internal troubles, which could destroy them overnight. They can control their vast, imperial empire, only through fear and terror.
The second lie, which throws fear into the hearts of anyone who seeks to become enlightened concerning the position of the Jews in the world, is the bugaboo of "anti-Semitism." Have you ever stopped to ask yourself, "Who is a Semite?" History proves that the Semites descended from Noah’s son Shem. This takes in the white, Anglo-Saxon, Celtic, Germanic, Scandinavian and related people. However, it does not include the people who call themselves Jews. They are the greatest "anti-Semites" of all time, since they constantly harass the true descendants of Abraham, the Arabs, whose land they have stolen. Yet no one would think of calling a Jew "anti-Semitic" because he harasses an Arab.
The third lie, which has been sold to American Christians by the Jewish propagandists, is that our heritage is "Judeo-Christian"; in other words, that Christianity is a direct derivative of Judaism. The New Testament is not now, nor ever has been a product of Judaism. Judaism is built on the Talmud, which is the antithesis of the Bible. Most of our pastors know this. Biblical Christianity is built on the teachings of Jesus Christ and Divine revelation as it was given to His Apostles. It has absolutely nothing in common with Judaism as anyone can see, who has taken the time and effort to read any of the Talmud.
Jesus Christ, speaking to the Judaic religious leaders of His day in Matthew 15:9, and quoting from the Prophet Isaiah said:
"In vain they do worship Me [God], teaching for doctrines the commandments of men."
In Mark 7:13, Christ again harshly criticizes the Pharisees, accusing them of "Make the word of God of none effect through your traditions." This same general idea is carried over in the teachings of the Apostle Paul. He warned the church at Colossae (Col. 2:22):
"Which all are to perish with the using; after the commandments and doctrines of men."
Again in 1st Timothy 4:1, Paul warned of a time which will come on this earth, when men will depart from sound doctrine to "give heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of devils." Oh how the fundamental preachers love this text, but none of them will tell their parishioners that this is what we find in the Jewish Talmudic teachings; they are heavily laced with the occult, in direct disobedience to the instruction of God, as given to Moses.
In Titus 1:14, Paul gives us a final warning about Jewish doctrine, when he says:
"Not giving heed to Jewish fables, and commandments of men, that turn from the truth."
So you see, my friends, if a Christian is honest, there is no way you can truthfully use the term "Judeo-Christian." They are at opposite ends of the pole. The Old Testament was compiled by Holy men of God who were Israelites. They believed in the one God, as shown in Isaiah 45:5:
"I am the Lord, and there is none . . . beside Me!"
They looked forward to the coming Redeemer of Israel, the Savior of the Christians. The Holy men of God wrote the sacred Book we call the Bible, as they were moved by the Spirit of God. The Old Testament is therefore the product of God, working through His servants, the prophets. Christianity predates the Jewish religion, for this came into being during the Babylonian captivity, when Israelites got away from God and brought back to Jerusalem a heathen book called the Talmud.
The Judaism of today is not the Law and the Prophets of the Old Testament, but the heathen occult religion of ancient Babylon.The Talmud, therefore, contradicts the teachings of Moses in almost every aspect. Moses was a Christian. This can be seen in a careful reading of Hebrews 11:24-26:
"By faith [the same faith which saves men and women in the Twentieth Century] Moses, when he was come to years, refused to be called the son of Pharaoh’s daughter; choosing rather to suffer affliction with the people of God, than to enjoy the pleasures of sin for a season: Esteeming the reproach of Christ [notice this part very carefully,] esteeming the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasures in Egypt: for he had respect unto the recompense of the reward."
But you may say: "Abraham and Moses were Jews; our pastor teaches this all the time." Oh, my friend, I beg to differ with you. They were not Jews. This term was not used until 2nd Kings 16:6, more than 1100 years after the death of Abraham and 700 years after the death of Moses. To call these men Jews is to engage in intellectual dishonesty. The Jewish writer, Benjamin Freedman, writing in 1954 to Dr. David Goldstein, a Jew who had been converted to Catholicism and who had become outstanding in his defense of the Catholic faith, said:
"It is a well-known fact that many counterfeit recent conversions [that is, of Jews to Christianity] have often proved hut infiltrations of latent traitors with treasonable intentions."
In one place in the Talmud, I forget where at the moment, Jews are advised to "become Christians (or whatever) for the sake of infiltrating their ranks." Then Mr. Freedman goes on to say:
"The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years. . . When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in a free world, the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of the end."
Freedman then goes on to show how the Christian faith has been put on the defensive throughout the world and mentions that a conspiracy is underway to destroy this faith. He goes on to prove to any honest mind that this is a Jewish conspiracy.
It is unfortunate, indeed, that Christian clergy seem to be ignorant, or apathetic to this plot to destroy everything they say they stand for as Christians. In fact, in many instances, they stand behind their pulpits and defend and support the very people who are pledged to destroy them.
There is no doubt in my mind that thousands of Christian pastors are deeply disturbed by the mysterious pressures from above, which often prevent them from exercising sound judgment. One outstanding Fundamentalist pastor, a leader in the Moral Majority, recently admitted to me:
"I am deeply disturbed by the Jewish influence behind the efforts to destroy the Moral Majority, even though we have been strongly pro-Jewish. But all the great Bible scholars and preachers of the Twentieth Century have said they were God’s Chosen People, so I will have to go along with them."
God have mercy oh us when we use this as the criteria for whether we are right or wrong!
The greatest spiritual teacher of all time, our Lord Jesus Christ, spoke to the Jewish religious leaders of His time in no uncertain terms in John 8:44. He said:
"Ye are of your father the devil and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, be speaks of his own; for be is a liar, and the father of it."
Then he goes on in verse 47, speaking to the Pharisees once more:
"He that is of God bears God’s words: you therefore hear them not, BECAUSE YOU ARE NOT OF GOD."
Does this sound much like "Chosen People" theology to you? These same Jews had already admitted they were not Israelites in verse 33, when they told Jesus:
"We be Abraham’s seed, and were never in bondage to any man."
If they had been true Israelites, they could not have said this, since any Bible scholar knows the Israelites spent over 400 years in bondage in Egypt. Yet their leaders told Jesus: "We have never been in bondage to any man." In John 10:26-28, Jesus spoke again to a crowd of Jewish hypocrites:
"You believe not, because You ARE NOT OF MY SHEEP . . . My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me: and I give unto them eternal life; and they will never perish."
Then in Revelation 2:9 and 3:9, we hear the final word of our Lord concerning these pseudo-Israelites, as He warns the church at Smyrna concerning them. He warns of:
"The blasphemy of them which say they are Jews and are not, but are the synagogue of Satan."
How can our preachers designate these blasphemers, whom Christ has cursed as "God’s Chosen People"?
Most of the confusion in the minds of Christians is unwarranted and unjustified. It would not exist if the Christian clergy had not aided and abetted the deceptions responsible for it. Many clergymen are allies with their enemies and it is no wonder that we see spiritual sabotage on every hand. It is no wonder that millions of potential "front line" soldiers for Jesus Christ have become spiritual cowards; who hide in their spiritual foxholes, praying for Christ to return and rapture them out of the mess they are responsible for.
I’m convinced that many in this category will be in for the "shock of their lives," for they will be so tightly zipped up in their "shroud of self-righteousness" that they will not get unzipped in time to go with their Master when He does come. Remember how Jesus once said:
"Not everyone that saith unto me, Lord! Lord! will enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that does the will of my Father which Is in heaven."
The will of God goes a lot farther than knocking on doors and inviting someone to attend church; it goes farther than telling them about the love of God and the way to salvation. It means "front line duty" in the battle that rages.
To stop this spiritual surrender, we are going to have to have an "about face" on the part of our clergy. Christian organizations, such as the Moral Majority, will never reach their full potential, until their leaders will willingly and honestly point out who their enemies really are.
Mr. Freedman puts his finger squarely on one of the major church problems, when he tells Dr. Goldstein:
"The utterances by the Christian clergy, which confuses Christians the most, is the constantly repeated utterance that ‘Jesus was a Jew.’ This appears to be your favorite theme. It is a misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact. . . . Informed, intelligent Christians, cannot reconcile this unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of facts."
Most competent Bible historians will admit that at no time in the new Testament is Jesus ever called a Jew and that, during His sojourn on earth, He was called a "Judean" by His contemporaries. The great Hebrew historian, Josephus, wrote many times concerning Jesus, but never once called Him a Jew. The church historian, Theoplylact, writing in 1080 A.D. says:
"The city of the Judeans was taken, and the wrath of God was kindled against them: as also Josephus witnesses, that this came upon them on the account of the death of Jesus."
When Pontius Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judea, crucified Jesus, he had inscribed on the cross the Latin words: "lesus Nazarenous Rex ludeorum." He was expressing his sarcasm for the Judean religious leaders who had pressured him into executing a man he knew was innocent. Authorities on Latin will tell you this inscription means: "Jesus the Nazarene, ruler of the Judeans." By no stretch of the imagination does this read: "King of the Jews," and it was NOT so translated in the 1611 printing of the King James Version of the Bible.
During His lifetime, Christ was never known as the "King of the Jews." Pilate knew that Jesus had been denied by the religious leaders of these people we now call Jews and that they were responsible for the false testimony they had brought against Him. Christ was crucified because it was politically expedient for Pilate to do so, not because of any guilt on His part. With the exception of a few of His followers, most of the Judeans abhorred His teachings. There were only 120 faithful ones in the "upper room" on the Day of Pentecost (Acts 1:15).
The fact that Jesus was never called a Jew, or was known by this name, cannot be erased by the "wishful thinking" of our theologians, no matter how hard they try to back the Jews. There is no factual foundation in history or theology, which would allow the word used by Pilate to describe Jesus as a Jew. The Greek word is "budais;" the Latin "Iudaeus," and the English translation can be nothing but "Judean." There is no way you can come up with a religious connotation for this word. During the time of Christ, at no place in the world, was there a religion known as "Jewish."
It is an acknowledged fact that the word "Jew" did not appear in the English language until 1775. Prior to that time, it did not exist in any language. It was introduced into the English language in a play written by an English playwright named Sheridan. It was unknown to Shakespeare and, as I mentioned, to the translators of the King James Version of the Bible in 1611. Contrary to popular opinion, Shakespeare wrote in his "Merchant of Venice," (V. III, i. 61) "I am an Iewe: hath not an Iewe eyes."
To go back a bit further, the word "Jew" does not appear in the 1582 version of the Douay Bible, the official translation of the Roman Catholic church. But it does in both that version and the King James Version, when they were revised later in the 18th Century.
The intellectual dishonesty of our clergy comes when they use the word "Jew" as a religious term, for this is a rank misrepresentation. The secondary meaning of the word "Jew" today has as little relationship to its original, as the word "camel" has to the cigarette which bears its name. It is the secondary meaning of the word "Jew" which has been used to confuse Christians. We should demand that our clergy be absolutely honest in the pulpit, not only in their use of the Word of God, but also in other matters. When the pulpits of Christian churches become a "propaganda platform" for the worst enemy of Christianity, then Christianity is in deep trouble.
It is a fact, proven from both the Scriptures and history, that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus, was not the race, nationality and culture of the self-styled Jews of this 20th Century. There are very few so-called Jews, who can trace their bloodlines back to Abraham. The Jewish writer, Alfred Lilienthal, in his book, The Controversy of Zion, states:
"I have no doubt that some of my Christian readers have as much right to the land of Palestine as Menachem Begin."
. It should become obvious to any honest student of history that those people who call themselves "Jews" have spent countless millions of dollars to manufacture the fiction that "Jesus was a Jew," and that the Judeans of His time can be identified with the Jews of today, and that the Christian religion is an offshoot of JudaismThis is blasphemy, straight from the "pits of hell."
Jesus did not practice the "religion of the Jews." He abhorred it. The religious beliefs taught in the synagogues of Judea during Christ’s lifetime were not the religion of Abraham, Isaac, Jacob and Moses. It was a heathen religious belief known as Pharisaism, which was soundly condemned by our Lord on many occasions. As I have already shown, from Scriptural sources, Jesus condemned these as being "children of Satan."
The eminent Jewish Rabbi, Louis Finkeistein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, in the Foreword of his first edition, The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith, says on p.21:
"Judaism . . . Pharisaism . . . Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name . . . the spirit of the ancient Pharisee survives, unaltered."
In other words, the Jewish rabbinate of the 1980′s is the same religious crowd to which Jesus spoke in Matthew 12: 34, when He said:
"O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things?"
The religion practiced by the Pharisees in Jesus’ time was based exclusively on the Babylonian Talmud. This, according to Rabbi Morris Kertzer, "consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries before the birth of Jesus."
Another well-known Rabbi, Michael Rodkinson, in his book, The History of the Talmud, wrote:
"The source from which Jesus of Nazareth drew the teachings which enabled Him to revolutionize the world . . . is the Talmud . . . the written form of that which, in the times of Jesus, was called the tradition of the elders."
But the Word of God gives the lie to this statement. In Mark 7:13, Jesus snid to the Pharisees:
"You make the Word of God of none effect through your traditions.”
So Jesus’ teaching could not have possibly come from this blasphemous book.
Are you naive enough to believe that a religious book which encourages incest, such as the Sanhedrin volume of the Talmud does, or unnatural intercourse; or rape of non-Jews; or bestiality, as found in this filthy volume; do you believe this could be the basis of Jesus’ teaching? If you do, then you are guilty of the vilest form of blasphemy. Are you willing to believe that statements found in the Talmud, such as those which follow, are the basis for Christianity? Listen closely, I will give you chapter and verse:
KALLAH, lb, (18b) – "Jesus was illegitimate and was conceived during menstruation."
SCABBATH XIV – "Jesus is referred to as the son of a Roman soldier and a Jewish prostitute."
SANHEDRIN, 103a – "This passage suggests that Christ corrupted His morals and dishonored Himself."
SANHEDRIN, 107b – "This passage states that Christ seduced and destroyed Israel."
HILKOTH MELAKHIM – Suggests that Christians sin by worshipping Jesus Christ.
HILKOTH MAAKHALOTH – This states that Christians are idolaters.
ORACH CHAIIM (20, 2) – Says that Christians disguise themselves as Jews in order to kill them.
ABHODAH ZORAH (1 Sb) – Suggests that Christians have sex relations with animals.
CHAGIGAH, (1 Sb) – States that a Jew is considered to be good in the eyes of God, in spite of any sins he may commit.
BABHA KAMA (1 13b) – States that the name of God is not profaned, if a Jew lies to a Christian.
And on and on, and on it goes, for 63 volumes of filth and blasphemy. This is what the Jews are taught in their synagogues. Do any of you Christians reading these words, believe the Christian religion got its start from this kind of blasphemy? This is what your pastor teaches, when he tells you that we have a Judeo-Christian culture.
If I had the time, I could cover several hundred pages, proving that 90% or more of the people in the world today, who go by the name of Jew, do not have one drop of Abraham’s blood in their veins and that none of the their ancestors ever placed foot on the ground of Palestine. Most of the Eastern Jews came from a completely heathen background, a heathen tribe called the Khazars of Western Russia. They were not Semites, but were Turco-Mongoloid. They were converted to Judaism en masse in the 7th Century. If you want further Jewish confirmation of this, I suggest you read Vol. IV, pages 1 to 5 in the Jewish Encyclopaedia.
Most Americans, especially those who go by the name Christian, are deeply disturbed by our economic collapse. But have you been honest enough to recognize that our money system in the United States has been under the control of evil, International Jewish bankers since the Civil War? Benjamin Franklin, addressing the First Continental Congress in 1789, warned them:
"Gentlemen, if you do not exclude the Jews from our shores, in less than a hundred years, every man, woman and child will be toiling in the fields as slaves to the Jewish debt money system."
His timing was off a bit, but otherwise he was correct. Our monetary system today is controlled by the Federal Reserve System, a Marxist principle which was slipped into our Constitution in 1913, at the instigation of the International Jewish bankers. Now this nation is in hock, up to its ears, to this same ungodly crowd; they could ruin us financially, at any time, with the snap of their fingers.
As a Christian, are you not grieved at the subversion of our youth and the degeneration of our nation’s morals? You should be! If you are a member of the clergy, you should be even more concerned, for you have been called to be "watchmen on the walls" of this nation, to warn them at the approach of danger (see Ezekiel 33:1-3). Have you heeded this call? Have you told your people the whole truth, or are you like those pastors of Jeremiah’s time (6:14) who cry: "Peace! peace! when there is no peace!"?
Too often today, American pastors have become "male prostitutes" for the International Zionists. Thousands of these "pseudo-pastors" are pandering to self-styled Jewish interests, as they literally sell this country "down the river," into the hands of those who will destroy Christianity and make us slaves.
I do not advocate hatred for the Jews, as some do. I believe that many of the "rank and file" Jews in America do not understand the plotting of their international leaders. Some do, and have been violently opposed to it! But I do say that we cannot, we must not allow the International Jews to control our government, our economics, our media and our churches, as they do today. Probably our first priority must be to get rid of the false prophets who stand in our pulpits crying: "It is your Christian duty to support the Jews; they are God’s Chosen Ones." God forbid!
Now, as during the Revolutionary War, our motto needs to be: "Tonight, put only Americans on guard!" Let’s take our country out of the greedy clutches of the international leeches. Let’s once again raise the flag of Jesus Christ over this nation. Let’s recognize Anglo-Saxon and kindred Christian Americans for what they are: the people who have been ordained to glorify Christ’s name. Then, with this knowledge, let us go out to battle with the enemy: for in His strength, we can conquer every foe and be free again.
Let us once more remember those stirring words, from the stanza of "The Battle Hymn of the Republic," which have been removed from our song books:
"I have read a fiery Gospel,
Writ in burnished rows of steel,
As ye deal with my condemners,
So with you my grace will deal.
Let the hero born of woman,
Crush the Serpent with His heel,
Since God is marching on!"
Colonel Jack Mohr (1916 – 2003)
FROM:
EXPLODING THE CHOSEN PEOPLE MYTH
The Most Monstrous MEME in All History INCOG MAN: Sick of all the BS…
http://www.biblestudysite.com/factsarefacts.htm
»Wandering Who? INCOG MAN: Sick of all the BS…
Israel’s Identity: It Matters! – Mission to Israel
Forbidden Truth – Downloads – Judaism’s STRANGE God’s
God’s Covenant People, Yesterday, Today & Forever – Table of Contents – Mission to Israel
Youtube Just Censored This Video!
Youtube which is owned by Google has been complaining about censorship in China. This video has had over 17,000 views on its first day. Was number 4 in its favorites list for news and current events. And had hundreds of 5 star ratings.
We are appealing [...]
SHOULD CHRISTIANS
EMBRACE
THE JEWS?
By William Finck 2008
Click here to listen to Eli James and William Finck on the topic of the difference between the Jews and first century Judaeans
Recently there was much media chatter concerning the current head of the Romish church, Herr Ratzinger (I ought not use any of the usual self-proclaimed titles, cf. Matt. 23:8-9), and his visit to the United States. One of the highlights of his trip, according to the media, was his stop at a New York City synagogue, and his embrace of the Jews there, where he gave a speech which stressed the so-called Jewish roots of Jesus (Yahshua) Christ and of Christianity. Yet nothing could be further from the truth. In reality which reality shall continue to escape the notice of most people in society Herr Ratzingers homage to the Jews of New York surely demonstrates the truth of such New Testament verses as Luke 4:5-6, John 14:30 and 1 Cor. 2:8, among others. For those whom we see in positions of authority are not the true wielders of power: it is the dragon (Rev. 12:7-9) which gives authority to the beast (Rev. 13:4). While this statement may seem enigmatic now, it may become clearer later, as this essay proceeds.
During His earthly ministry Yahshua Christ continually distinguished Himself from the Jews, and there are clear examples of this in the words of Christ recorded at John 8:31-47 and John 10. Such distinction is also made by the gospel writers, especially by John, such as at 7:1 and 9:22. In order to understand this distinction, and the reason for the division recorded in the New Testament, it is fitting to examine the history of Judaea in the period leading up to the birth of Christ: for why were Herod and all Jerusalem troubled even at an announcement of His birth and why did they conspire to kill Him, rather than rejoice as the Magi and the shepherds did (Matt. 2:1-23; Luke 2:8-20)?
Many centuries before the birth of Christ, from approximately 745 B.C. to 676 B.C., almost all of the population of ancient Israel and Judah were destroyed or removed to other lands by the invading Assyrians, outlined briefly in 2 Kings chapters 17 and 18. The Assyrians left only the inhabitants of Jerusalem, for which see 2 Chron. 32. Ancient Assyrian inscriptions have been found which corroborate these histories, and show that hundreds of thousands of Israelites were taken and resettled in the north. These Israelites are the lost sheep of Ezekiel chapter 34, and the subject of many Biblical prophecies made even long after their deportation. Yet none of these people were ever called Jews, and therefore they are not the subject of this discussion, although it surely can be demonstrated that for the most part these people developed into the Christian nations of later history.
By 585 B.C., nearly all of those left behind by the Assyrians had been taken away by another invader, the Babylonians, who destroyed Jerusalem and removed the people to Babylon (2 Kings 25; 2 Chron. 36). Of all of these, only about 40,000 people returned to Jerusalem some years later, as recorded by both Ezra and Nehemiah. From these 40,000, some of whom settled in Galilaia but most of whom settled in and around Jerusalem, descended Yahshua Christ and the apostles and their countrymen, and the Jews of Judaea and Jerusalem. Yet it is fully apparent that the Hebrew religion and prophecies of the Old Testament belonged to a much wider group than these, who never returned to Judaea nor whom were ever called Jews something quite difficult to discern from all of todays propaganda.
At Ezra 10 and Nehemiah 13 we see that these people who returned to Jerusalem began intermarrying with the Canaanites the ancient enemies of Israel who were accursed by Yahweh the God of Israel and upon being admonished and repenting, they put off their foreign wives. This occurred in the 5th century B.C., and the Old Testament records end here, over 400 years before the birth of Christ. Yet much of this 400 years which are wanting in our Bibles are described by secular historians, and especially by the Judaean historian, Flavius Josephus.
From Josephus and others it can be seen that the Edomites the descendants of Esau and his Canaanite wives (Gen. 36) had moved into the lands of Simeon and Judah after the Israelites were deported. By 130 B.C., under the Maccabees who were the high priests at Jerusalem, the people of Jerusalem had grown quite strong and after throwing off the yoke of the Greek rulers of Syria to whom they had been subject, they conquered all of the Canaanites and Edomites who had inhabited the surrounding areas, and forced them all to convert to the religion of Judah, already called by this time Judaism in the Greek and Roman tongues, and all of those people Israels traditional enemies became known as Judaeans, or Jews. Once converted to Judaism and practicing circumcision, it became quite easy for the true Israelites of Judaea (the descendants of the 40,000) to begin intermarrying with the Edomites and Canaanites of Judaea, and this time without any apparent religious guilt or criticism. By 80 B.C., many Edomites had gotten themselves into positions of power and authority in the kingdom of Judaea, and especially the family of Herod. By 40 B.C. the first Herod (that of Matthew chapter 2) had become the de facto king of Judaea, having slain the last of the Maccabees, and being bribed by Herod, Marc Antony persuaded Octavius Caesar and the Roman Senate to make Herod the official king, about 36 B.C. Once Herod became king, the high priesthood and other positions at the Temple in Jerusalem became political tools, and over the years many of Herods friends and kinsmen were granted appointments to such offices a practice which continued until the Temple was finally destroyed in 70 A.D.
Understanding this history, it is evident how the Judaeans whom Christ reproved could claim to be Abrahams offspring, and yet Christ denies that they were true children of Abraham (John 8). For being descendants of Esau, their claim was valid, yet Yahweh the God of Israel hates Esau (Mal. 1:1-3), as Paul reminds us in Romans chapter 9, where the apostle tells us that not all of those in the Israel of his day were actual Israelites, and he proceeds to contrast Jacob and Esau! Describing the Israelites as vessels of mercy and the Edomites as vessels of destruction (Rom. 9:22-33), here he explains the reasons for the division among the first century Judaeans, also evident in many passages elsewhere, such as Rev. 2:9 and 3:9. Being, in part, descendants of Canaanites, they were also descendants of the Kenites the children of Cain and the Rephaim, all of whom mingled together (i.e. Gen. 15:19-21). This is why the Edomite Herod was representative of the great red dragon … that old serpent, called the devil, and Satan (Rev. 12) who attempted to kill the infant Christ, for the Kenites and the Rephaim were descendants of the serpent and the fallen angels of Genesis!
For this reason Yahshua Christ told those Judaeans whom He reproved that Ye are of your father the devil (John 8:44), and But ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, as I said unto you (John 10:26). Note that He did not say ye are not of my sheep, because ye believe not, as the Romish and Protestant churches teach. No, He said ye believe not, because ye are not of my sheep, where we see that the Jews the non-believing, anti-Christian Judaeans were never His sheep in the first place! Indeed, the Bible and history show that they are Canaanites and Edomites the enemies of Israel cursed and hated by Yahweh God.
Paul separates the Judaeans into two groups: vessels of mercy and vessels of destruction, as the prophet Jeremiah separated the inhabitants of Jerusalem into two groups: good and bad figs (Jer. 24). Of the bad figs, Jeremiah prophesied that they were to be removed into all the kingdoms of the earth for their hurt, to be a reproach and a proverb, a taunt and a curse, in all the places whither I shall drive them (Jer. 24:9). Likewise Yahshua Christ, surely alluding to Jeremiah, standing in Jerusalem in 32 A.D. and prophesying about the coming destruction of the city and temple which happened in 70 A.D. is recorded as having said … for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations … (Matt. 21:23-24), and He said this speaking of the unbelieving Judaeans, the bad fig, not of my sheep, Edomite Jews! This diaspora of 70 A.D. was not the dispersion of the people of God once known as Israel for that had happened centuries before, in the Assyrian and Babylonian deportations. Rather, the diaspora of the Jews was as both Jeremiah and Christ attest the diaspora of the enemies of God and of Christ! From these people descend again, in part the Jews of today, who have mingled themselves with people from many other races along the way, yet who have kept their religion as a common bond except for the converts to Romish catholicism in certain places in the Middle Ages, especially in Italy and Spain. For nearly 40 years, from the crucifixion in 32 A.D. to the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 A.D., the gospel was the filter which separated many of the good figs from the bad. Most of the good Judaeans, as Josephus attests, had fled Jerusalem before its destruction. Christians, of course, had the warnings of Christ.
It is often claimed by the Jews of today that the Romans killed Christ, being responsible for the crucifixion, and both the Romish and many Protestant churches often parrot this nonsense. For at Luke 19:27, at the end of the parable of the ten pounds, as it is often called, we find Christ saying But those mine enemies, which would not that I should reign over them, bring hither, and slay them before me. Elsewhere we see the Jews exclaim We have no king but Caesar (John 19:15) and His blood be on us, and on our children (Matt. 27:25). After the crucifixion, the apostles clearly fix the murder of Christ on the people of Judaea, and never on the Romans, as can be clearly seen at Acts 2:23; 4:8-10; 7:52-53 and 1 Thess. 2:14-15. The Romans did not kill Christ! The record is clear that the Judaeans (Jews) killed Christ. The Romans were merely the hammer in the hand of the Jews! Can a murderer blame his crime on the weapon? It is also clear that while many good people in Judaea went along with the crucifixion, they were merely following along with the masses and the propaganda of their leaders, the Pharisees and Sadducees, the great number of whom were bad-fig Edomite Jews. Politics then was no different than it is today! For this reason Paul explains that those who deny Christ shall receive much greater punishment than those who transgress the laws of Moses, and that God shall indeed take vengeance upon the Christ-deniers (Heb. 10:28-30). The Jews, claiming to be the people of God, bring much greater punishment upon themselves even if they are! Yet in reality they are not: they are rather the synagogue (assembly) of Satan (the Adversary), i.e. Rev. 2:9 and 3:9.
In another oft-repeated Jewish claim, they justify their religion which is not the valid Hebrew religion, for indeed Christianity is the fulfillment of the law and the prophets by claiming that there is more than one path to God, and that these different paths are reflected by the various religions of the world. Yet the words of Yahshua Christ Himself clearly refute this, for at John 14:6 He is recorded as having said: I am the way, the truth, and the life: no man cometh unto the Father, but by me. At John 10:7-9 He says … I am the door of the sheep … I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved …, and so it is evident that there is only one path to Yahweh God, and it is also evident that only His sheep pass through that door! Furthermore, Paul, in his epistle to the Hebrews (1:6), says in reference to Christ: And let all the angels of god worship Him. An angel is a messenger, the meaning of the Greek word. If one claims to be a messenger of God and does not worship Christ, then his religion is vain, and its promises empty. Throughout the Old Testament are prophecies and promises concerning Christ. Those who claim to find their religion in it, and yet are not Christians, are frauds who deceive even themselves. The Jews are foremost among these!
The Greek word anathema means accursed. A valid argument may be presented that the word maranatha, found at 1 Cor. 16:22, is actually a Hebrew phrase which means a rebel to be destroyed. This interpretation derives mara from Strongs Hebrew dictionary #4754 (see also 4775, 76, 77, 79 and 4784) as a rebel, and natha from #5421 (see also 5422, 23) as to destroy or in the Passive, to be destroyed. It can even be argued that this interpretation is more defensible than those of the mainstream scholars, where there is disagreement in the lexicons even as to how the phrase maranatha should be parsed, and the words derived are not so far as I have seen identified precisely. Nevertheless, mainstream scholars insist that the phrase means O Lord, come, or something similar, even though this is forced into the context of the preceding words. Rather, it is quite evident that 1 Cor. 16:22 should read: If anyone does not love the Lord Yahshua Christ, he must be accursed (anathema), a rebel to be destroyed [maranatha]! This reading of the phrase is much more natural in the context of the words which precede, and is quite legitimate, being derived from identifiable Hebrew words. And such are the Edomite Jews accursed by God whom Paul calls vessels of destruction in Romans 9. Yet we need not rely upon this one statement having to decipher the enigmatic and argue over its meaning to see that Christians must reject Jews. For there are many other such statements left to us by the apostles of Christ which instruct us in like manner.
In the first epistle of John, at 2:22-23, we read: Who is a liar but he that denieth that Yahshua is the Christ? He is antichrist, that denieth the Father and the Son. Whosoever denieth the Son, the same hath not the Father, and in the historical context of Johns writing, the apostle can only be describing the Jews. John continues at 4:1-3: Behold, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Yahshua Christ is come in the flesh is of God: And every spirit that confesseth not that Yahshua Christ is is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world. While naive catholics and other adherents to the mainstream sects await The Antichrist whom they believe to be some future beastly ruler often depicted with science-fiction quality abilities, the truth is that the antichrists have walked among us for thousands of years already! Many of them today are called Jews! Their spirits are not from God, but are rather from their own father the devil (John 8:44). John speaks of them further, at 1 John 5:10: He that believeth on the Son of God hath witness in himself; he that believeth not God hath made him a liar: because he believeth not the record that God gave of his Son. The Jews, by rejecting Yahshua Christ, esteem God to be a liar! Should Christians embrace Jews?
In Johns 2nd epistle, the apostle reinforces the instruction that those who deny Yahshua are the antichrists, at verse 7: For many deceivers are entered into the world, who confess not that Yahshua Christ is come in the flesh. This is a deceiver and an antichrist. So we see that the Jews are liars, deceivers, and antichrists! In the same epistle, at v. 9: Whosoever transgresseth, and abideth not in the doctrine of Christ, hath not God. He that abideth in the doctrine of Christ, he hath both the Father and the Son. John proceeds to instruct his readers how to treat those who reject Christ, at vv. 10 & 11: If there come any unto you, and bring not this doctrine, receive him not into your house, neither bid him Godspeed: For he that biddeth him Godspeed is partaker of his evil deeds. To bid Godspeed is archaic language meaning simply to greet. So it is evident that Christians certainly should not embrace Jews, nor even so much as greet them!
Paul makes a statement similar to 2 John 9-11, while discussing sound Christian doctrine, at 1 Tim. 6:3-5: If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to wholesome words, even the words of our Lord Yahshua Christ, and to the doctrine which is according to godliness; He is proud, knowing nothing, but doting about questions and strifes of words, whereof cometh envy, strife, railings, evil surmisings, Perverse disputings of men of corrupt minds, and destitute of the truth, supposing that gain is godliness: from such withdraw thyself. And so, Christians must reject the Jews!
In the first century, the Jews used the organized religious sects, the Pharisees and Sadducees, to oppose Christianity, and through these their power to persuade the Roman authorities against it. Unto this day the Jews continue to oppose Christianity, both with their own cries of religious persecution and with the secular organizations which they have founded and operate, such as the ACLU and the ADL, among others, which employ once-Christian court systems in order to oppress Christianity. While these groups seek to extinguish Christianity, Christian morals, and Christian ideals, Christians suffer these groups, engage with them, even make donations to them, and embrace the Jews who support them! Such is contrary to the advice of Paul, who warned Christians to Let no man deceive you with vain words: for because of these things cometh the wrath of God upon the children of disobedience. Be not ye therefore partakers with them … And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather reprove them (Eph. 5:6, 7, 11), and Only let your conversation be as it becometh the gospel of Christ … that ye stand fast in one spirit, with one mind striving together for the faith of the gospel; And in nothing terrified by your adversaries: which is to them an evident token of perdition, but to you of salvation, and that of God. For unto you it is given in the behalf of Christ, not only to believe on him, but also to suffer for his sake (Php. 1:27-29). The token of perdition comment shows that these adversaries of Christ are those vessels of destruction Paul discussed in Romans chapter 9 the Edomite Jews. Paul discusses them again at Php. 3:18-19: For many walk, of whom I have told you often, and now tell you even weeping, the enemies of the cross of Christ: Whose end is destruction, whose God is their belly, and whose glory is in their shame, who mind earthly things. These are indeed the antichrists of Johns epistles. For a few verses before, at Php. 3:2, Paul warned: Beware of dogs, beware of evil workers, beware of the concision, and the lines which followed show that by concision Paul meant those practitioners of Judaism who insisted that men be circumcised in the flesh.
Not all Judaeans who in the first century converted to Christianity did so with sincerity. Rather, often they were infiltrators, attempting to subvert the Gospel. Peter and Jude both warned about these (2 Pet. 2; Jude 4-16). Paul tells of them again at Gal. 2:1-10, where he calls them false brethren unawares brought in, who came in privily to spy out our liberty which we have in Christ Yahshua, that they might bring us into bondage, since they attempted to compel Titus to be circumcised. Elsewhere, Paul warned the elders of the Ephesians that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock. This is why John warned in his epistle, Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world. Therefore everything touted as doctrine must be measured against the entire Bible.
These false brethren were more interested in gaining control over men (Gal. 2:5) than in being true Christians themselves. And those whom they couldnt subvert, they persecuted. Paul says at 1 Thess. 2:14-15: For ye, brethren, became followers of the churches of God which in Judaea are in Christ Yahshua: for ye also have suffered like things of your own countrymen, even as they have of the Jews: Who both killed the Lord Yahshua, and their own prophets, and have persecuted us; and they please not God, and are contrary to all men: Forbidding us to speak to the [nations] that they might be saved, to fill up their sins always: for the wrath is come upon them to the uttermost. The problems in Thessalonica which Paul refers to here are described at Acts 17:1-9, where it is evident that common Thessalonians were incited to act against the Christians by certain Jews. They do this same thing in our society today! Early Christian history shows that it was the Jews who were behind all the Roman persecutions of Christians as Tertullian also attests in his Apology (21.25). However, not being able to stifle Christianity from the outside, history is replete with examples of Jews who converted to Christianity, only to later subvert it with false doctrine from within. The results of this continue to plague the mainstream Christian sects to this very day, and especially Romish catholicism.
Why dont Christians actually follow the New Testament? Why do they disregard all of these admonitions and warnings, and embrace the Jews? Today, all of Western Civilization is in a state of drastic decline because we have embraced the Jews! Here in America, the Jews who have been here in significant numbers for only about 130 years have led us into racial integration and a world full of drugs and pornography. Our cities are destroyed, our economy ever teetering on the verge of collapse. Inflation of the money supply is rampant. Our formerly world-leading manufacturing base is disappearing, along with our middle class. Most of our technology has been freely transferred to our enemies. Jewish Marxist ideology has become the standard throughout all of our academia, and now holds the center ring in our political circus. If one doesnt believe that the Jews are indeed responsible for all of this, one must investigate just who it is running all of the major banking houses, such as Goldman-Sachs and Solomon Bros., Morgan Stanley and Citibank, along with the hedge funds and holding companies, such as KKR, which are really just corporate raiders with improved public relations. One must investigate how such a large percentage of positions on the White House staff, the houses of Congress and their staffs, and all of the cabinet departments are filled by Jews. In addition, all of the most powerful media companies, such as Disney, Time-Warner, Viacom, The New York Times, The Washington Post, The Wall Street Journal, and many others, are owned and/or managed by Jews. Like Judaea at the time of Christ, most all of the so-called upper-crust of American society is now occupied by the antichrist, Edomite Jews! Christians very naively pity Jews when they cry persecution, while at the same time the Jews devour the substance of the Christians! Those whom as Paul says might bring us into bondage have done so indeed through oppressive taxes and laws and who mind earthly things have through fraud and deceit come to possess all of our earthly things! When will Christians ever start actually practicing what it is that they profess to believe? Only then can our nation and the other White nations of the world who suffer in like manner ever begin to be healed.
Click here for more on the Antichrist
When Christians embrace jews, horrible things happen: