Posts Tagged ‘Europe’

Career-Chick Blues Spreading

If 2 books could be written about the reaction to Arizona’s new immigration law (SB 1070), then 4 books could be written about the damage that women-in-the-workforce has caused to White culture: high divorce rates, juvenile delinquency, neglected husbands, less productivity, lower wages – in a saner West, it would be illegal to employ a White mother or a married White woman (under most circumstances):

[Article].

Hitler’s Speech of July 28, 1922

Truly prophetic speech from almost 100 years ago.

Russian National Union

Russian National Union

???????? ????? | English |

Quote:

We stand for:
• The uniqueness of our country, the centre of the thousand-year Russian civilization, which has its own traditional values and spiritual sovereignty.
• Mental and physical health of the Russian nation, a united and healthy family, the traditional morality.
• Social justice and social guarantees for all citizens.
• The education, science and culture supported by the government.
• An effective system of defense and social protection of all personnel.
• Law and order.

We are against:
• The rejection of our traditional values, national culture and historical mission.
• Mental, cultural and physical degradation of our nation.
• The disintegration of the traditional family.
• Separatism, terrorism, corruption and organized outlawry.
• Multicultural tendencies and globalization.
• Unlimited immigration.
• The exploitation of our minerals and the pollution of our environment.


Tory press finds plenty of BNP supporters in Barking

Tory press finds plenty of BNP supporters in Barking
April 12, 2010 – By Martin Wingfield

nickinbarkingTHE Tory media are desperate to shore up David Cameron’s crumbling support. They can see voters switching loyalty, but it’s not from Labour to the Conservatives. Instead it’s from Labour to the British National Party, and that’s got them worried.

This morning the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail, both unashamed mouthpeices for the Tories, carried extensive anti-BNP reports on our campaign in Barking in an effort to dissuade their readers from voting for the British National Party.

In both reports, ‘journalists’(?) Paul Bracchi and Tanya Gold found significant support for the British National Party.

Bracchi wrote in the Daily Mail:

“The Cross of St George is blowing in the breeze outside Clive Neal’s end of terrace in Barking. Mr Neal is 61. He took early retirement from the Dagenham Ford plant in 2002 when car production finally stopped and many thousands of jobs were lost.

“Gradually, since then, and probably before, he says, the street he still lives in, the area he grew up in, and the country he was once so proud of has changed ‘beyond all recognition’ and no one – certainly not anyone from the Labour or Conservative parties – bothered to knock on his door and ask him what he thought about it, or the effect it might be having on his life.

“Clive Neal used to vote Tory, but now he informs me, that ‘I will be voting BNP’, adding: ‘We’re losing our sense of what it is to be British and this upsets and frustrates me.’

“Farther up the road, single mother Karen Woodward, 39, says she will also be voting BNP. As will the woman, in her late 50s, at the pebble-dash terrace at No. 50, and the 34-year-old former builder, now registered disabled, at No. 52 (’I’ve never voted BNP before, but I’m going to because the country is in a mess’).

“The grandmother a few doors up? BNP. The middle-aged man at the house with a dodgy extension; BNP. His next-door neighbour; BNP. Two pensioners, behind the blue and brown doors, across the street; both BNP. A third pensioner, male, walking along the pavement. ‘Yes,’ he would be voting BNP, too.

“The underlying electoral statistics confirm the anecdotal evidence.”

The Telegraph’s Tanya Gold found equally enthusiastic support in a local pub.

“The drinkers come out to talk. They are all ex-Labour, now BNP. “It’s housing, schools, hospitals and jobs, not colour,” says one man. “I believed in Old Labour but not New Labour. They have failed in this borough.”

“People have had enough,” says a woman. “We are being pushed to the back of the queue. My son couldn’t get into the school of his choice. He has no chance of a council house.”
“You don’t appreciate that our facilities are getting swamped,” says another man. “If we vote BNP, people might start listening to us. Because we have been abandoned by our government.”

Providing further evidence that Labour voters are switching allegiance is the lack of posters in people’s windows.

Five years ago when Labour won the seat with a 7,000 majority, Barking was covered with ‘vote Margaret Hodge’ posters. This weekend there were hardly any to be seen . . . and that is significant.

Hodge’s 7,000 majority is shrinking by the day because voters are switching to Nick Griffin and the British National Party.

Tory press finds plenty of BNP supporters in Barking

http://bnp.org.uk/files/2010/04/nickinbarking.jpg

Tory press finds plenty of BNP supporters in Barking
April 12, 2010 – By Martin Wingfield

nickinbarkingTHE Tory media are desperate to shore up David Cameron’s crumbling support. They can see voters switching loyalty, but it’s not from Labour to the Conservatives. Instead it’s from Labour to the British National Party, and that’s got them worried.

This morning the Daily Telegraph and Daily Mail, both unashamed mouthpeices for the Tories, carried extensive anti-BNP reports on our campaign in Barking in an effort to dissuade their readers from voting for the British National Party.

In both reports, ‘journalists’(?) Paul Bracchi and Tanya Gold found significant support for the British National Party.

Bracchi wrote in the Daily Mail:

“The Cross of St George is blowing in the breeze outside Clive Neal’s end of terrace in Barking. Mr Neal is 61. He took early retirement from the Dagenham Ford plant in 2002 when car production finally stopped and many thousands of jobs were lost.

“Gradually, since then, and probably before, he says, the street he still lives in, the area he grew up in, and the country he was once so proud of has changed ‘beyond all recognition’ and no one – certainly not anyone from the Labour or Conservative parties – bothered to knock on his door and ask him what he thought about it, or the effect it might be having on his life.

“Clive Neal used to vote Tory, but now he informs me, that ‘I will be voting BNP’, adding: ‘We’re losing our sense of what it is to be British and this upsets and frustrates me.’

“Farther up the road, single mother Karen Woodward, 39, says she will also be voting BNP. As will the woman, in her late 50s, at the pebble-dash terrace at No. 50, and the 34-year-old former builder, now registered disabled, at No. 52 (’I’ve never voted BNP before, but I’m going to because the country is in a mess’).

“The grandmother a few doors up? BNP. The middle-aged man at the house with a dodgy extension; BNP. His next-door neighbour; BNP. Two pensioners, behind the blue and brown doors, across the street; both BNP. A third pensioner, male, walking along the pavement. ‘Yes,’ he would be voting BNP, too.

“The underlying electoral statistics confirm the anecdotal evidence.”

The Telegraph’s Tanya Gold found equally enthusiastic support in a local pub.

“The drinkers come out to talk. They are all ex-Labour, now BNP. “It’s housing, schools, hospitals and jobs, not colour,” says one man. “I believed in Old Labour but not New Labour. They have failed in this borough.”

“People have had enough,” says a woman. “We are being pushed to the back of the queue. My son couldn’t get into the school of his choice. He has no chance of a council house.”
“You don’t appreciate that our facilities are getting swamped,” says another man. “If we vote BNP, people might start listening to us. Because we have been abandoned by our government.”

Providing further evidence that Labour voters are switching allegiance is the lack of posters in people’s windows.

Five years ago when Labour won the seat with a 7,000 majority, Barking was covered with ‘vote Margaret Hodge’ posters. This weekend there were hardly any to be seen . . . and that is significant.

Hodge’s 7,000 majority is shrinking by the day because voters are switching to Nick Griffin and the British National Party.

Genocidal Immigration and Anti-Nativism in Britain


Gates of Vienna: Ethnically Cleansing the English, by Paul Weston:

To become an ethnic minority in your own country over just a few decades suggests that government policy, as has recently been revealed, was indeed to ethnically cleanse the English from their homeland, although the multiculturalists who committed this wicked act of treason and betrayal never couched it in quite such plain language, preferring instead to frame mass immigration as a means of achieving social objectives.

These figures are not hysterical, nor are they the obtained from the research of paranoid periodicals. In 2007 The Guardian reported that Britain was heading toward a population of 70 million by 2031, but did not mention that the addition of an extra 10 million people whilst the indigenous population was simultaneously declining and emigrating required the importation of an awful lot more than just an extra 10 million immigrants.

Indeed, the liberals and the leftists are only too aware the indigenous population is being ethnically cleansed. In 2000 The Guardian predicted a white minority Britain by 2100, therefore tacitly admitting acceptance of population replacement, but erring only on the time frame necessary to achieve racial cleanliness.

Fjordman said…

Terms such as “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” should not be used lightly, but Paul Weston is unfortunately entirely correct here: What is happening with the native white population throughout Western Europe is a purposeful, state-sponsored campaign of ethnic cleansing. The only thing that’s unique about Britain is that key members of the ruling party openly admit this, in writing. What Andrew Neather probably didn’t realize when he said this was that he inadvertently laid the basis for a new Nuremberg process where Multiculturalism is listed as an ideology with the stated intention of the physical destruction of whites everywhere. As such it constitutes an organized crime against humanity.

NATO, led by the USA, bombed the Serbs for “ethnic cleansing,” thereby facilitating the Islamic ethnic cleaning of Christians in the Balkans. So, if the Western Multicultural oligarchs are against ethnic cleansing, I guess they must now bomb Britain, where the authorities have publicly admitted that they are deliberately destroying the native population of their country. So why isn’t that happening? Could it be because similar anti-white policies are followed in all white majority Western nations without exception?

It’s time we realize that the humiliation, dispossession and gradual destruction of whites, from Canada to Sweden, is not the accidental result of a failed policy but the deliberate result of an evil policy, the largest campaign of ethnic cleansing in recorded world history. An this is happening in the “free and democratic West.” If “democracy” means the genocide of your people then what the hell is it good for?

Fuchur said…

Terms such as “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” should not be used lightly, but Paul Weston is unfortunately entirely correct here

I cannot take someone serious who uses the words “ethnic cleansing” and “genocide” in that context. Just look at the word “genocide”: “Killing” is part of the word. Now when, say, a black woman immigrates to GB and then gives birth to a child there – how is that in ANY way related to KILLING somebody??? I can only shake my head in disbelief at the vile twisted minds that could come up with such a warped comparison. Even Orwell would be baffled at that crazy attempt at Doublespeak: giving birth = killing. Ingenious.

This is racism, in it’s purest and simplest form. Period. Now, you could maybe try and make the point that racism isn’t all that bad and so on… but please don’t insult our intelligence by claiming that this isn’t racisim. Really. It’s just too ridiculous…

Paul Weston said…

@Fuchur

Curious name, curious morals.

You read an article pointing out the territorial and cultural displacement of a race of people, and your response is to make the accusation of racism.

You must hate the white race with a passion!

The UN definition of genocide quoted does not include the word “killing” and nor do I make such an association in my article.

I imagine you have an extremely short attention span, so will repeat the UN definition of genocide for you, and the UN rights of indigenous peoples.

“Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part…”

“Indigenous peoples and individuals have the right not to be subjected to forced assimilation or destruction of their culture.”

“Any action which has the aim or effect of dispossessing them of their lands, territories or resources;”

You see, no mention of the word killing…

Perhaps a simple yes or no question might be in order.

Do you think the UN declarations above should be applied to the indigenous English?

Yes or no.

Failure to respond might well lead people to think you a rather silly fuchur.

The genocidal regime in Britain, and indeed in all White countries, agrees with Fuchur.

BNP ‘whites-only’ membership rules outlawed | Politics | guardian.co.uk:

Judge agrees with human rights watchdog that British National party’s rewritten criteria for joining are still racist

In a landmark injunction at the Central London county court, a judge found that the BNP’s membership policy remained discriminatory, even after a direct whites-only clause was removed last month.

The judge, Paul Collins, ordered the BNP to remove two clauses from its constitution as they were indirectly racist towards non-white would-be members.

While one offending clause is largely an administrative matter – a requirement that all new members agree to a vetting visit from BNP officials, something the judge found could intimidate non-white applicants – the other spells out core beliefs.

This is a requirement for members to believe in the “continued creation, fostering, maintenance and existence” of an indigenous British race and action towards “stemming and reversing” migration.

Our enemies see concern for the interests of indigenous Whites as “racist”, and not being “racist” against alien interlopers takes precedence over the desire of native Whites to ensure our very existence. That they have the power to legalize their crimes does not absolve them of responsibility.

More Euro Genocide? You’ll love this…

SECRET PLOT TO LET 50MILLION AFRICAN WORKERS INTO EU
Story Image

LABOUR MARKET: Millions of Africans could get the green light to head to Europe in search of jobs

Saturday October 11,2008
By Nick Fagge in Mali

MORE than 50 million African workers are to be invited to Europe in a far-reaching secretive migration deal, the Daily Express can reveal today. 

A controversial taxpayer-funded “job centre” opened in Mali this week is just the first step towards promoting “free movement of people in Africa and the EU”.

Brussels economists claim Britain and other EU states will “need” 56 million immigrant workers between them by 2050 to make up for the “demographic decline” due to falling birth rates and rising death rates across Europe. 

The report, by the EU statistical agency Eurostat, warns that vast numbers of migrants could be needed to meet the shortfall in two years if Europe is to have a hope of funding the pension and health needs of its growing elderly population.

It states: “Countries with low fertility rates could require a significant number of immigrants over the coming dec ades if they want to maintain the existing number of people of working age. 

“Having sufficient people of working age is vital for the economy and for tax revenue.” 

The report, by French MEP Francoise Castex, calls for immigrants to be given legal rights and access to social welfare provision such as benefits. 

Ms Castex said: “It is urgent that member states have a calm approach to immigration. To say ‘yes’, we need immigration … it is not a new development, we must accept it.” 

The proposals include the creation of a “blue card” system, based on the American green card, that provides full working and welfare rights. 

SEARCH UK NEWS for:

Blue card holders would be entitled to move freely across the EU, setting up home in any of the 27 member states. 

Last night Sir Andrew Green, of Mig rationWatchUK said: “Eng land, with Holland, is al ready the most crowded country in Europe.

“As it is, we have to build the equivalent of seven cities the size of Birmingham over 25 years for the immigrants the Government already expects.  

“Yet again the ‘one-size-fits-all’ policy of the EU produces absurd results. These would be ridiculous proposals if they were applied to the Britain. 

“The Government must ensure that these work permits are not valid for the UK.

“Higher levels of immigration are the last thing we need with a recession approaching.” 

And Shadow Home Sec retary Dominic Grieve said: “When ministers are talking tough about efforts to control immigration, they need to provide a clear explanation that national policy is not being undermined through the backdoor in Brussels.” 

The UK Indepen dence Party leader Nigel Farage attacked the move as “an outrage”. He said: “The sooner Britain gets back control of immigration policy, the better.”

The proposals – part of the Africa-EU Partnership signed in Portugal last December – also warns of the negative effects of mass immigration and calls for “better integration of African migrants”. 

It calls too for a compassionate approach to the eight million illegal immigrants already living in the EU. 

It states: “Irregular migrants must not be treated like criminals. Many risk their lives seeking freedom or the means
of subsistence in Europe. As long as the EU has a higher standard of living than those countries to its south and east, the temptation to come will exist – especially if there are jobs to be had.”

The declaration calls on the EU to assist African governments to set up migration information centres “to better manage labour mobility bet ween Africa and the EU”.

The first was the job centre opened in Bamako, capital of Mali, on Monday. Other centres are expected to open soon in other west African states and later in north Africa.

Yesterday the Daily Express revealed that, in an apparent contradiction of immigration policy, thousands of migrants – like Kanoute Tieny from Mali – are being given up to £5,500 in grants by the EU to return home to Africa.

French president Nicolas Sarkozy wants to implement an EU-wide immigration plan by the end of the year when he stands down as head of the Council of the European Union.

This body implements policy proposed by the European Commission and discussed by the European Parliament. 

French immigration minis ter Brice Hortefeux has represented all the 27 EU states, including Britain, in a succession of whirlwind tours through west Africa to help create a strategy.

Last night the Home Office said the UK had nothing to do with this EU plan.

A Border Agency spokesperson said the initiative is aimed at promoting legal migration routes in the Schengen area of the EU which the UK opted out of. The area includes most but not all member states.

“We therefore retain full control of our own borders and our asylum system.”

Express.co.uk – Home of the Daily and Sunday Express | UK News :: Secret plot to let 50million African workers into EU

British Liberal party leader sacks spokeswoman for “unacceptable” comments on Israel

5 February 2010

Baroness Jenny Tonge, a senior member of the British opposition party Liberal Democrats, has been sacked as her party’s health policy spokeswoman in the House of Lords after she called on Israel to disprove allegations that its medical teams in Haiti harvested the organs of earthquake victims and sold them on for transplantations.

Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg said Tonge’s comments had been “wrong, distasteful and provocative and I recognize the deep and understandable distress they have caused to the Jewish community. While I do not believe that Jenny Tonge is anti-Semitic or racist, I regard her comments as wholly unacceptable.”

He said Tonge apologized "unreservedly" for any offense she may have caused. The baroness is a patron of the news website ‘Palestine Telegraph’, which printed the allegations. In the past, Tonge often launched scathing attacks against Israel. In 2004, she told a pro-Palestinian lobby group on the issue of suicide attacks by Palestinians against Israel: "If I had to live in that situation – and I say that advisedly – I might just consider becoming [a suicide bomber] myself."

The Board of Deputies of British Jews welcomed Baroness Tonge’s dismissal, saying her support for an investigation into accusations of organ harvesting by the Israeli rescue teams was "outrageous and a calumny.

Baroness Tonge has promoted this libel against Israel by utilising historical themes that are classically deployed to attack the Jewish people. She has dishonored the noble efforts of Israelis who engaged in a selfless humanitarian effort to save lives in Haiti."-wtf-

The umbrella body of British Jews declared in a statement that "any further use of anti-Semitic rhetoric must result in Tonge’s expulsion from the party and loss of the whip."

~fu~

World Jewish Congress

The mad myth of Israeli organ theft | spiked

The rise and fall of Baroness Jenny Tonge A True Friend of Palestine

From Gaza: Suffering Like Gazans: Urgent: Support Baroness Jenny Tonge as she supports Freedom and Justice

Jewish group wants British politician out over Haiti slur – ABC News (Australian Broadcasting Corporation)

Tonge fired over organ harvesting remark

Dresden victims march stopped

Check out the spin.

German protesters stop neo-Nazi march in Dresden – Yahoo! News
By Dirk Mueller-Thederan Dirk Mueller-thederan – Sat Feb 13, 1:30 pm ET

DRESDEN, Germany (Reuters) – At least 10,000 Germans formed a human chain in Dresden on Saturday and stopped neo-Nazis staging a funeral march to remember victims of the Allied air raid that flattened the city 65 years ago.

About 5,000 neo-Nazis, clad in black, had gathered at Dresden’s Neustadt station — where Nazis once packed trains with Jews bound for the Auschwitz concentration camp — hoping to stage Germany’s biggest far-right march since 1945.

In the past few years, the February 13 anniversary of the destruction of Dresden, in which 25,000 people were killed, has become a focus for neo-Nazis who describe the blanket bombardment as a "bombing Holocaust."

But large numbers of anti-neo-Nazi protesters, who turned out despite freezing temperatures, stopped the far-right sympathizers from getting into the town center.

"Stopping the Nazi march was a great success for the Nazi Free Alliance Dresden," said Alliance spokeswoman Lena Roth.

"It wasn’t easy — there were people injured in Nazi attacks and it was horribly cold, but it was worth it," she said.

Police reported isolated clashes between the two sides and at one point the 5,000-strong police force, with reinforcements drafted in from across Germany, used water cannons.

A spokesman said officers had made seven arrests but the violence police had feared appeared to have been avoided after organizers declared the far-right gathering over in the late afternoon and supporters gradually dispersed.

Some waved black, white and red flags and wore T-shirts with militaristic symbols. Others wore garments with pictures of Lancaster bombers with the slogan "Saviours of Democracy?"

"We are gathered here to remember one of the biggest war crimes of World War Two," Kai Pfuerstinger, deputy head of the far-right JLO Youth Corps East Germany, told the crowd earlier.

A debate about whether breaking public morale through the raids was justifiable has rumbled since the bombing, which started on the night of February 13, 1945, and flattened the city. The defeat of Hitler’s Nazis was imminent.

The wave of attacks, by British and U.S. bombers, used incendiary bombs which created an inferno that ripped through streets, burning and melting people and buildings alike.

Although a mainstream debate has taken place in the past few years about the extent to which Germans can view themselves as victims of a war they were responsible for, there is little sympathy for the views of militaristic neo-Nazi groups.

"February 13th, the day of the bombardment of Dresden, is abused by the right as a myth of sacrifice," said Wolfhart Goll of the Nazi Free Alliance.

Dresden has only in the last decade been restored to its former glory, complete with its trove of cultural treasures.

Senior politicians from Dresden and the state of Saxony and a representative of the Central Council of Jews laid wreaths at a cemetery where the victims of the bombardment are remembered.

(Writing by Madeline Chambers; Editing by Louise Ireland)

Germany (not new but overlooked)

Dozens of German words have for decades been taboo for native speakers because of the way those words were used by the Nazis.

Now, an 800-page dictionary has been published to serve as a guide to avoiding linguistic traps into which Germans can easily fall.

Terms such as "endloesung" (final solution) or "selektion" (selection) can quickly get the user into trouble, because the words acquired specific meanings and associations during the Third Reich.

"Endloesung" was the word used by the Nazi regime for its plan to exterminate the Jewish race, [sure it was] and it will forever be associated with Adolf Hitler’s genocidal "Final Solution to the Jewish Question."

"Selektion" is a term to avoid because of its use by the Nazis to refer to the death camp practice of "selecting" those to be executed.

"Lager" (camp) refers to the concentration camps in which millions died and is especially hurtful to survivors of the Nazi past.

The "Woerterbuch der Vergangenheitsbewaeltigung" (Dictionary of Coming to Terms With the Past) examines around 1,000 words and phrases – everything from "Anschluss," used to refer to the "annexation" of Austria in 1938, to "Wehrmacht," the name of the Nazi-era armed forces. The guide aims to look at the meaning and usage of the terms as they have evolved from before World War II through the present.

"We don’t mean to wipe out those words from the German language for good," explains Thorsten Eitz, a co-author of the dictionary, in an interview with ABCNews.com. "But we want to make people more sensitive to the power of those words and phrases and their associations to the Nazis. We’re taking a close look at what roles such terms play in today’s Germany." Eitz, a German linguist at Duesseldorf’s Heinrich Heine University, and his co-author, German studies professor Georg Stötzel, have been working on the dictionary for about four years. The authors put the book together with the goal of "filling a gap on the market," says Eitz.

"We’ve been kicking around the idea for some time, especially since we’ve witnessed a kind of inflationary use of words and terms associated with the Nazis in the early 80′s and again in recent years," Eitz says. "You can be pretty sure to make headlines and thus we assume that often those terms are used deliberately for that reason only. Most of the time, though, the use of those taboo words in public discourse backfires and causes tremendous controversy."

The Cardinal of Cologne, Joachim Meisner, well-known for provoking controversy, caused a storm of criticism and faced resignation calls not too long ago for using the word "entartet" (degenerate) in a speech claiming modern art was at risk of "degenerating."

The word "entartet" has strong connotations with the persecution of artists accused by Nazis of producing "degenerated art," and the Cardinal’s remarks caused a real uproar among Germans sensitive about the country’s Nazi past.

The controversial Cardinal also was the target of strong criticism when he compared an abortion pill to Zyklon B, a poison gas used by the Nazis in the gas chambers.

His colleague, the late Archbishop Johannes Dyba of Fulda, coined the term "babycaust" during his anti-abortion campaign. The analogy to "Holocaust" stirred a heated debate across the country.

Similarly, the late head of the German Central Council of Jews, Paul Spiegel, came under fire in 2005 when he criticized the German policy by which Jews were allowed to move from the former Soviet Union, saying that Russian Jews were being "selected" to live in Germany. "The use of taboo words seems attractive to all kinds of groups," says Eitz. "To name but a few, even animal rights activists got front-page coverage recently with an anti-factory farming campaign titled ‘Holocaust on Your Plate.’ Now, that’s a no-no and they have been sharply criticized for using the term Holocaust, a term which should be exclusively used to describe the Nazi regime’s brutal murder of millions of people during the Third Reich."

There’s no specific target group for this dictionary, according to the author. He says it was written for average Germans or German speakers who are interested in the language. "Having said that," Eitz explains, "it was also written for the younger generation, people in their twenties, who have no idea of Third Reich connotations in the German language. Young people often don’t know that certain terms were used by the Nazis and that therefore using those terms can be found upsetting."

Wolfram John, a retired cameraman, tells ABCNews.com that people should keep in mind that language is all about how words are used. "It is still far more important to teach the youth of Germany intensively about all the facts of the Third Reich. The ‘Dictionary of Coming to Terms With the Past’ might be helpful in this context. But there shouldn’t be rigid rules: every train in Germany has an ‘Anschluss’ – a ‘connection’ to another train. As always in life, the tone (and the intention) makes the music."

Beware of Nazi Words – ABC News

France?s Chief Jew Rat: Nicholas Sarkozy

Europeans say Jews exploit past to extort money

Nearly half of western Europeans believe jews exploit their ‘past persecution’ in order to extort money, a new Israeli report says.

The report, which the Jewish Agency conducted jointly with Israel‘s Information and Diaspora Ministry, found that 42 percent of those polled by the University of Bielefeld in Germany agreed that "jews exploit the past to extort money," Haaretz reported on Monday.

The countries in which the highest percentage of the population agreed with that statement were Poland and Spain.

There were more anti-Israeli incidents in 2009 than in any year since World War II, according to the annual Jewish Agency report released January 24.

During the first three months of 2009, immediately following Israel’s three-week offensive in the Gaza Strip, there were as many “anti-Semitic” incidents recorded as there had been for the entire year of 2008.

"With the start of the operation, a wave of acts of anti-Semitism started across the world," the report said, referring to last winter’s Operation Cast Lead, during which over 1,400 Palestinians were killed.

At the press conference in which the report was released, officials also referred to a film that accuses Israel of stealing human organs at the field hospital set up by the Israel Defense Forces in Haiti.

The Jewish Agency is in charge of immigration and the absorption of jews coming into Israel.

Europeans say Jews exploit past to extort money

Stop the Genocide of European Mankind

  • Stop the Genocide of European Mankind

Ukrainian political analyst under fire for views on 1930′s famine

Published 19 December, 2009, 10:09
[YOUTUBE]
<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/p0lywK2BnWk&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/p0lywK2BnWk&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]

A Ukrainian political analyst is under scrutiny by security services due to his views on the 1930s USSR famine, the Holodomor, which differs from the authorities’ stance that it was genocide against the Ukrainian people. After dozens of articles, political analyst Viktor Pirozhenko could be best described as the hard man of modern-day Ukraine – and his strident opinions have caused mixed reactions.

“I criticize the country’s current leadership for policies which are openly ethnically discriminatory and which favor ethnic Ukrainians. I criticize them for reviving neo-Nazism in the country and falsifying history. And, of course, I bring facts to support my point of view,” political analyst Viktor Pirozhenko says. More…

More on this…
Yushchenko brings Stalin to court over genocide

Jews worldwide outraged by Yushchenko’s praising of Nationalists

Edited 02 February, 2010, 12:21

[YOUTUBE]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tc4Vd89854E&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/Tc4Vd89854E&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]

The largest Jewish human rights organization in the US, the Simon Wiesenthal Center, joined the chorus of those who condemn the declaration of controversial nationalist leader Stepan Bandera as a Hero of Ukraine.

Mark Weitzman, head of government affairs at Wiesenthal Center wrote to Ukraine’s Ambassador in the US, noting that “it is surely a travesty when such an honor is granted right at the period when the world pauses to remember the victims of the Holocaust on January 27.” More…



Read Also…
Post-Soviet nations do their best to blacken USSR’s victory in WWII

Nationalists help defend Rechnik

What is it with Jews and bulldozers? Background… There is a village on the outskirts of Moscow inhabited mostly by retirees or veterans who plant gardens there and is thought of as a park-like environment since it stands apart from the big city. There are plans to tear it down and evict everyone without cause and build high-rises there. They are attempting to force the inhabitants out with bulldozers. Sound familiar?

I will make this story simpler by cutting straight to the Jew. She is Yelena Baturina, wife of Moscow mayor Yuriy Luzhkov and the richest woman in the world. This shows how she gets rich. There was never any problem with Rechnik before she convinced her husband to let her expand there….

From

…In 1991 Baturina founded her company, Inteco …After Luzhkov became the mayor of Moscow in 1992, Inteco grew quickly, and he was accused of corruption because her company was getting municipal contracts.

Intimidation of Inteko

On October 9 2005 executive director of Inteko-agro Alexander Annenkov was attacked in Belgorod by three assailants armed with axes. He survived.[9] At the time Baturina had been having business problems in Belgorod, with her attempts to modernise farmland there being opposed by local governor Yevgeny Savchenko.

So, you get the idea. But here is the good side: Seeing they had no choice the Rechnik residents decided to call the nationalists (skinheads) who came to their aid. They have now barricaded themselves in one of the houses and there is standoff, which has caused this story to get more publicity.

From Slavic Union…

01/02/2010 Nationalists await the assault, locking themsselves in a house in Rechnik. In Moscow’s settlement "Rechnik" during the demolition of houses, police are preparing to force their way into a house which nationalist activists have barricaded themselves from the organization "Slavic Union". "We are barricaded in a house that belongs to one of the locals – Vinogradov," – said Interfax leader of Dmitry Demushkin. According to him, today in the morning, bailiffs and police officers were walking around the house." About 30 police and bailiffs had twice knocked at the door, and were told that we are not open. At some hours they were gone from our sight, and now back again. We were told that they would penetrate into the house by force, if the landlord will not open" – said Demushkin. He reported they already arrested three activists of "Slavic Union," which on Monday had resisted police.

Offical news story here…

With ‘Land Grabs’ On Rise, Will Russians Find New Issue To Rally Around?
[YOUTUBE]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/4TfD9KlQxr0&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/4TfD9KlQxr0&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/YOUTUBE]

MOSCOW — Nearly a week after bulldozers, police, and demolition crews moved in to destroy several luxury homes in the western Moscow neighborhood of Rechnik, they returned in force on January 26 to tear down two more.

City officials defended the move, saying they were acting on a court ruling stating that the houses had been built illegally. In all, 42 Rechnik buildings are slated for destruction — including the house belonging to Aleksandr Navrodsky, who watched the early-morning demolition with despair. More…

Terrorists plan attack on Britain with bombs INSIDE their bodies

Terrorists ‘plan attack on Britain with bombs INSIDE their bodies’ to foil new airport scanners

By CHRISTOPHER LEAKE, MAIL ON SUNDAY HOME AFFAIRS EDITOR
Last updated at 10:01 PM on 30th January 2010

Britain is facing a new Al Qaeda terror threat from suicide ‘body bombers’ with explosives surgically inserted inside them.

Until now, terrorists have attacked airlines, Underground trains and buses by secreting bombs in bags, shoes or underwear to avoid detection.

But an operation by MI5 has uncovered evidence that Al Qaeda is planning a new stage in its terror campaign by inserting ‘surgical bombs’ inside people for the first time.

New weapon: To avoid detection by airport body scanners (above), Al Qaeda are said to be planning to surgically insert explosives into suicide bombers’ bodies

Security services believe the move has been prompted by the recent introduction at airports of body scanners, which are designed to catch terrorists before they board flights.

It is understood MI5 became aware of the threat after observing increasingly vocal internet ‘chatter’ on Arab websites this year.
The warning comes in the wake of the failed attempt by London-educated Nigerian Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab to blow up an airliner approaching Detroit on Christmas Day.

One security source said: ‘If the terrorists are talking about this, we need to be ready and do all we can to counter the threat.’
A leading source added that male bombers would have the explosive secreted near their appendix or in their buttocks, while females would have the material placed inside their breasts in the same way as figure-enhancing implants.

Experts said the explosive PETN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate) would be placed in a plastic sachet inside the bomber’s body before the wound was stitched up like a normal operation incision and allowed to heal.

Failed attempt: Abdulmutallab tried to detonate a bomb sewn into his pants

A shaped charge of 8oz of PETN can penetrate five inches of armour and would easily blow a large hole in an airliner.

Security sources said the explosives would be detonated by the bomber using a hypodermic syringe to inject TATP (Triacetone Triperoxide) through their skin into the explosives sachet.

PETN – the main ingredient of Semtex plastic explosive – was used by Richard Reid, the British Al Qaeda shoe-bomber, when he unsuccessfully tried to blow up American Airlines Flight 63 from Paris to Miami in December 2001.

In November, a Somali man who attempted to board a flight carrying a syringe, liquid and powdered chemicals was arrested before take-off.
The airliner had been due to fly from Somalia’s capital Mogadishu to Dubai.

The Somali was carrying a nearly identical package to that of Abdulmutallab, who tried to detonate it by injecting TATP from a syringe.

Abdulmutallab had stuffed explosives down his underpants as the Northwest Airlines flight from Amsterdam made its final descent to Detroit carrying 280 passengers.

But the detonator fluid set his clothes on fire rather than the device, and he was overpowered.

Security sources fear the body-bombers could pretend to be diabetics injecting themselves on airliners, Tubes or buses in order to prevent anyone stopping their suicide missions.

Companies such as Smiths Detection International UK, which is based in Watford, Hertfordshire, manufacture a range of luggage and body scanners designed to identify chemicals, explosives and drugs at airports and other passenger terminals around the world.

These include high-specification X-ray equipment that could identify body bombs.

But one source with expertise in the field said: ‘They can make as many pieces of security equipment as they like but there is no one magic answer that can spot every single potential terrorist passing through.’

Conservative MP Patrick Mercer, chairman of the Commons Counter-Terrorism Sub-Committee, said: ‘Our enemies are constantly evolving their techniques to try to defeat our methods of detection.

‘This is one of the most savage forms that extremists could use, and while we are redeveloping travel security we have got to take this new development into account.’

Senior Government security sources confirmed last night that they were aware of the new threat of body bombs, but were not prepared to make any official comment.

Read more: Terrorists ‘plan attack on Britain with bombs INSIDE their bodies’ to foil new airport scanners | Mail Online

EU anti-revisionist law by the end of the year?

On January 27, 2010, the “International Holocaust Remberance Day”, EU Commissioner for Security and Justice and Vice-President of the EC, Jacques Barrot, made the following highly important statement on his newspage :

“Sixty-five years ago, the world woke itself to the horrors of Auschwitz. Today, it is our duty to pay tribute to the 6 millions of Jews and all the other victims of the Holocaust.

We have a duty to remember the loss of life and the suffering caused by this unprecedented crime in history. This legacy must be passed to future generations as a memento. Miep Gies, one of the Dutch citizens who hid Anne Frank and her family from the Nazis and who preserved Anne Frank’s diary said that the past is never over.

Remembrance of the Shoah must strengthen our determination to fight, in today’s world, against the phenomena that several decades ago led the world into the abyss of the Holocaust. (…)

No form of antisemitism, regardless of where and whom it comes from, is acceptable. The commemoration of other crimes cannot be to the detriment of the remembrance of the Shoah. The conflict in the Middle East cannot be an excuse or justification for antisemitism. It is deplorable to read at the very wake of the commemoration of the Holocaust statements that deny the Shoah. It is unacceptable to deny or minimize the established history of the Nazi genocide against the Jews. The value of human life is universal: this is true for each and every human being, regardless of their race, religion, or nation.

At the end of this year, Member States will have to implement the long-awaited Framework Decision on racism and xenophobia. Sixty-five years after the extermination camps were liberated, we can be proud that EU law makes the denial of the Shoah a crime in all its Member States. The Commission is strongly committed to pay particular attention to the correct transposition and implementation of all the provisions of this Framework Decision across the Union.”

Thus, if Barrot and his cohorts have their way, critical scrutiny of the “Holocaust” claims, i.e. “Holocaust denial” will be illegalized come 2011 in all EU member states, not only the ones already equipped with such anti-heresy laws (among them Germany, Austria, France, Belgium and the Netherlands). The modern day inquisition of the Holy Shoah will enter a new stage. “The European Mind Stops…”

Inconvenient History | Revisionist Blog EU anti-revisionist law by the end of the year?

Police Chase – Gypsies driving high speed vehicles

[YOUTUBE]QL3SVglkH_k[/YOUTUBE]

Whats new in the John Dem trial?

First off, I want to say sorry to everyone, I have been very busy with my career, steering it in the right direction. Things have been very busy for me and the family…

Now, whats new with Mr John Demjanjuk? (Spelling sorry)

Every article I read has some other witness from the camp, making testimony about the camp, but nothing about him! Its such a shame! Maybe one or two character witnesses to the events, but thats all it has been!

What will happen when he is found not guilty again eh? Will the US give him back his citizenship? I highly doubt it.

Return top

Enjoy Some Music