The Definitive Source For News On Jews

It’s true – the British are more inclined to embrace the NWO/JWO. Maybe it’s all that tea they drink…

[Article].

There’s more to the Madoff scandal than meets the eye:

[Article].

This data is strange in one way – you’d think that Jews would want White “hicks” to get into Ivy League universities so that they could then be brainwashed with Frankfurt School horseshit and burdened with tens-of-thousands of $ worth of student-loan debt:

[Article].

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald: [Here].

The Voice of Reason Broadcast Network is pleased to replay four speeches given at the first National Conference of the American Third Position Party (A3P), which was held Sat. Jun. 19, 2010.

Speech by Dr. Tomislav Sunic

7 MB / 32 kbps mono / 0 hour 32 min.

Download audio file (VoR-A3P_National_Conference-20100619-1-Tom_Sunic.mp3)

Speech by Dr. Kevin MacDonald
Dr. [...]

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald:

[Article].

As many of you have already heard, there have been some changes here at TOQ Online and The Occidental Quarterly. Dr. Kevin MacDonald was recently appointed as the new Editor of TOQ. The journal has been placed in his hands.

I’ve been appointed as the caretaker of TOQ Online. Samuel Phillips has already introduced himself as the new webmaster. This website will serve as a repository for articles from back issues of the journal. The plan is to post an article a week. I will probably be posting these articles on the weekend while everyone is off work and has the time to read them. It is unclear whether additional material will be posted on a daily basis.

There will be a few other changes. A new section will be created that will allow TOQ subscribers to download a PDF version of the journal as soon as each new issue is released. There has been a spirited debate in our community as to whether TOQ should shift entirely from print to digital media. The new online version of the journal should provide some valuable feedback and help us resolve this question.

Greg Johnson has a new radio show on Voice of Reason. He is the Editor or a new website called Counter Currents. You can reach him at his new email address. I’m sure these two new outlets will develop into a content rich source for his prodigious energies. I’m told he will soon be publishing some great new books about the European New Right. Look out for those.

Note: There will be some technical changes coming soon. This website might go offline for a few days as we complete the transition.

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald:

[Article].

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald:

[Here].

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald:

[Here] and [Here].

Whites: Take a look at it all and think!

by Dr. Kevin MacDonald:

Part 1: [Here].

Part 2: [Here].

A very encouraging recent trend is the emergence of some very talented young people in the movement for White advocacy and cultural preservation. One of the reasons I was attracted to American Third Position was the presence of young men willing to go out into the street and very publicly proclaim their beliefs. Young men are the backbone of every revolution in history, and the revolution to take back America and the West will be no different.

Of course, it’s still rather dangerous to do so, as I discuss in an article on the A3P website (”Being White in Public“) two A3P people manning a booth in San Juan Capistrano were harassed by a Latino gang. Vastly outnumbered, they had to withdraw.

Peter Brimelow has recently documented the obvious fact that although there was a media-driven moral panic about the Hutaree militia, the left has repeatedly engaged in violence and intimidation:

“Political violence” in the U.S. and throughout the Anglosphere exclusively comes from the Left. Who shut down the recent American Renaissance conference with death threats? (An atrocity, incidentally, that the Washington Post did not deign to report, although it happened in its home town). Who prevents Ann Coulter or Tom Tancredo from speaking on campuses? Has this ever happened to any Left-wing group or speaker?

As I note in the article, Anti-Racist Action is quite upfront about their willingness to resort to violence to keep White advocates off the streets. We have to be willing to be publicly visible. I think one of our first priorities should be to loudly and proudly participate in public events aimed at explicit White advocacy. Doing so in large numbers would make it very difficult for the left to shut it down.

The encouraging thing is that the number of intelligent, articulate young people who are willing to do that. These people have somehow grasped the depth of the problem faced by their people in the teeth of wall-to-wall propaganda directed against White identity that they have endured throughout their school years and the enormous social pressures they face as adults against advocating for their people.

Another very promising group of young people is Youth for Western Civilization — an organization aimed at college students that certainly deserves financial support as they try to fund a full-time staff. (Needless to say, A3P is also deserving of financial support and for the same reasons.) Kevin DeAnna, the founder and president, is a very articulate and effective spokesman for the preservation of our culture and traditions. And he understands that in the end it’s about the people who will make up the country.

His excellent video, linked here, shows the true face of the immigrant invasion: Ethnocentric and unassimilable non-Whites with historical hatreds against Europeans; commitment to far left ideologies rather than constitutional government and the rule of law; trampling on the American flag while waving their own flags; minority activist organizations like La Raza, often with an explicit ideology of conquering the US for their people — well-funded by corporate America and leftist foundations; unions of public service employees such as the Service Employees International Union, led by Andy Stern, that are committed to big government and non-White immigration; and sell-out politicians like Dick Armey who are attempting to influence the Tea Party movement to welcome immigration amnesty as somehow good for the Republican Party.

As the film shows, Armey is indeed a sell-out, receiving huge fees from pro-immigration activist groups. One of our biggest problems is that it is financially lucrative for Whites to become whores for the interests of people who hate them. Funding organizations like A3P and Youth for Western Civilization means that a critical mass of young people have a viable career option in what amounts to pro-White activism.

As DeAnna says toward the end of the film, if the Republican Party accepts amnesty, it really means the end of the country. He is absolutely right. And the sad thing is that even if amnesty is defeated, it will simply slow down the process of White displacement. Unless the illegals are deported and legal immigration is stopped, White America is doomed. That is the position of American Third Position.

The Occidental Observer Blog, April 3, 2010

William Sheldon’s current TOO article (“Pro-White Conference 2.0”) offers suggestions on how to avoid the aggressive tactics typically used against any meeting that has overtones of White advocacy. The recent cancellation of the AmRen conference and the cancellation of three speeches in America by BNP leader Nick Griffin (including one scheduled for AmRen) indicate a need to come up with a counter strategy. As Sheldon notes, the face-to-face meetings that are enabled by conferences are a crucial ingredient in any organization. Quite a few people attend conferences not so much to hear the speakers but to be able to network with like-minded others.

Sheldon’s strategy of using Webinar technology would probably work — provide the benefits of a pro-White conference without drawing the attention of their Leftist opponents. It is an excellent prescription for a group that must remain underground in order not to expose its members to the usual costs of being associated with White advocacy (job loss, etc.).

The downside is that pro-White advocates would be implicitly accepting their status as an underground movement. Such meetings could essentially go on forever without effecting real change in the direction we all want.

It seems to me that we have to get above-ground visibility. We have to make noise and have a public presence if we are going to make real progress. We have to get in people’s faces and have the courage of our convictions. Hence perhaps Nick Griffin’s “frequently voiced despair over U.S. politics, given its lack of white nationalist parties” (in the WSJ article).

This is one thing that attracted me to American Third Position. The young men who are the backbone of the party go out onto the streets with signs and pamphlets advocating deporting illegals and other issues related to pro-White advocacy. They are not afraid of people spewing in-your-face hostility at them. (Guess what? You may be called a “racist” or a “Nazi.”) They do not hide away in secret conferences or restrict themsleves to discussing issues among themselves on private email lists.

Quite clearly, the left is well aware that public visibility would be the beginning of the end for their dominance of public discourse. That’s why the mainstream media has given almost no coverage to the cancellations of AmRen or Nick Griffin — the only exception I have come across is a brief mention in the Wall Street Journal. The article is noteworthy for not mentioning anything about the obvious implications for public discourse in America. The tone of the article is that some meetings of far right crazies got shut down — expressed in the same manner as a story on the cancellation of a meeting of the local school board because of a snow storm. Imagine the outrage if meetings of La Raza or the NAACP were shut down with similar tactics.

Meetings at privately owned facilities are problematic because businesses are likely to cave under the pressure of the left and I suppose that is their right as property owners.  Some people have suggested using government-owned facilities because denial by such a facility would raise First Amendment issues. I think this is a good idea. And we should be ready with attorneys willing to argue on our side if there are attempts at disruptions or if the government attempts to cancel the event for reasons like “public safety.” And we need security forces; and ways to identify the people who are doing the disrupting.

And it should all be out in the open.

The Occidental Observer Blog, February 26, 2010

By Anonymous Attorney
Vdare.com, February 4, 2010

It’s long been rough going for Kevin MacDonald, the California State University/Long Beach psychology professor whose writings on “implicit whiteness”, Jewish influence and other topics have brought on SPLC ($PLC) investigations, faculty denunciations and, he blogs recently, classroom disruptors.

It’s a price to be paid in a time when advocacy for whites has become, bar none, America’s most towering taboo. The good professor might have to dip into the materials on “psychological stress caused by ostracism” floating around his office somewhere.

Here are some students bragging about efforts to have him removed from his teaching position, with a focus on his recent support for a Third Party effort:

“Senior English major Doug Kauffman was one of the students who led the demonstration in MacDonald’s class last Tuesday.

“‘We planned this [demonstration] at least a month in advance; the goal would be to have every student just get up and walk out,’ Kauffman said.

“Marylou Cabral, a senior art education major and participant in the demonstration, commented on the student’s reactions.

“‘Many seemed appalled, and I think a few even left,’ Cabral said. ‘Our goal is to let students know about [MacDonald’s] involvement in Freedom 14 and other neo-Nazi groups. We feel that the students need to know what they’re getting into.’

“Both Kauffman and Cabral are students at CSULB and members of the Party for Socialism and Liberation (PSL), a Marxist and Leninist organization that advocates revolutionary change and progressive reform.

[Students call for removal of psychology professor: Tenured professor Kevin MacDonald says he just wants to teach, regardless of his political views, by David Cowan, Daily 49er, January 31, 2010]

But if they’re going to fire Kevin MacDonald, logically they should take care of a few other professors while they’re at it:

• Robert Jensen

Jensen [Email him] is a journalism professor at the University of Texas whose hatred of whites practically radiates from his body. He once declared, in a book titled Heart of Whiteness: Confronting Race, Racism and White Privilege, that “I don’t think white people should love their whiteness. Better for everyone, I think, that we take a shot first at hating it”. Imagine the reaction if a professor had substituted “blackness“ for “whiteness”! Jensen went on: “I want to live in a world where I can at least imagine that someday I will be able to stop being white.” [VDARE.com note: Jensen appeared previously on VDARE.com when he denounced Thanksgiving.]

Jews have a term for this: the self-hating Jew. Whites also apparently have a name for it: tenured journalism professor. (And we wonder why the MSM takes the stances it does).

As can be seen from his website, Jensen isn’t shy about his extreme anti-white stance, or his political involvement. Yet I’m unaware of any students disrupting his class, fellow faculty members denouncing him, or Heidi Beirich camping out near his house and going through his garbage.

And a white student required to take one of Jensen’s classes might just have a legitimate concern: is this guy going to flunk me in the name of punishing the evil white race?

So what’s the difference between Kevin MacDonald and Robert Jensen?

Setting aside scholarship quality or pedagogical skill, it’s that they’re on opposite sides of the race issue in America. Jensen’s on the “right” side, and finds himself nesting cozily in Austin. MacDonald is on the “wrong” side, and finds himself the target of countless attacks.

• Noel Ignatiev

Ignatiev, a history professor at the Massachusetts College of Art, is founder of a journal [Email them]( called Race Traitor Motto: treason to whiteness is loyalty to humanity) and a fellow at Harvard’s W.E.B. DuBois Institute. He wrote in the Harvard Magazine that “abolishing the white race” is “so desirable that some may find it hard to believe” that anyone other than “committed white supremacists” would oppose it.[ Abolish the White Race, September-October 2002 ]

Well, sure—your typical Republican member of Congress isn’t exactly standing in the way of that plan. But Ignatiev does put it awfully bluntly.

Again, might not a white student in his class feel a little uncomfortable? If so, none have called any attention to the problem.

• Gregory Jay

Gregory Jay [Email him] is an English professor at the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. How that qualifies him to bash whites as the source of all the world’s evil, I’m not sure. But he does.

Jay is a proponent of “whiteness studies”, which as you might guess, does not have anything to do with appreciation of white people or their cultures. In an essay titled “Who Invented White People?”, [PDF]he calls “whiteness” an insane delusion with no scientific foundation, asserts that we’re all mongrels, and insists that whites benefit from unearned privilege.

If “race does not exist”, would Professor Jay consider dumping affirmative action? And have you ever heard any of the “race does not exist” crowd direct this at blacks or Hispanics, lecturing them that “blackness is a social construct” or that being a Hispanic or a Latino is a “delusion“ and that La Raza should pack up and go home?

Funny, haven’t heard that.

And again—it goes without saying that Gregory Jay isn’t having his classes disrupted or fellow faculty members holding somber meetings on what to do about his obvious anti-white racism.

In the past, CSULB’s president, F. King Alexander, [Email him]and its Academic Senate have issued statements distancing themselves from MacDonald. But to its credit, the school currently appears to be backing his freedom to research and write on the topics of interest to him. “Academic freedom, free speech… we don’t change that”, a university spokeswoman told me over the phone.

CSULB is also making it known that such disruptions violate university policy. Campus police are aware of the situation and are ready to respond to calls (562-985-5049 OR 911).

My advice to the disruptors: try debating the issues instead. Give speeches on your own time. Write letters. Blog for the socialist blogs.

Heck, invite Jensen, Ignatiev and Jay for a university-wide anti-white forum. I’m pretty sure nobody will be there to disrupt it.

Kevin MacDonald: Casting pearls before swine?

On January 26, 2010, a new campaign of intellectual and political persecution was launched against Kevin MacDonald, Professor of Psychology at California State University, Long Beach. The express goal of this campaign is to get Professor MacDonald fired from his job because of his research and political convictions.

Professor MacDonald’s research threatens the cultural and political hegemony of the organized Jewish community by exposing their ongoing subversion of Western civilization. This research has made Professor MacDonald a target of persecution by Jewish individuals, organizations, front groups, and their dupes for nearly a decade.

This persecution has intensified of late because of Professor MacDonald’s affiliation with the newly-formed American Third Position political party, which threatens Jewish hegemony by explicitly representing the interests of white Americans, who are being culturally and politically dispossessed by Jews and their non-white allies.

Student agitators affiliated with Jewish front groups called “Students Fight Back” and the “Party for Socialism and Liberation” entered Professor MacDonald’s classrooms on the first day of the Spring semester and passed out propaganda to induce students to drop his classes. The agitators also threatened to circulate a petition calling for Professor MacDonald’s dismissal.

See Douglas Kauffman, “Long Beach students boycott fascist professor Kevin MacDonald,” on the website of the Party for Socialism and Libertation and Sonia Scherr’s “Student Activists Confront Anti-Semitic California Prof” on the website of Professor MacDonald’s long-time persecutors the Southern Poverty Law Center.

Professor MacDonald has commented on the latest round of harassment on The Occidental Observer Blog: “The multi-cultural left’s broad definitions of ‘racism’ — and aggressive tactics” and “The academic left’s involvement in politics.”

Professor MacDonald’s enemies try to cloak their radical agenda in standard liberal pieties, but whether from cynicism or mere stupidity, their attempts are so clumsy that any child can see through them.

For instance, one of the agitators, Marylou Cabral, is concerned that Professor MacDonald’s research and political commitments might color his teaching. The fact that she does not apply the same standards to politically engaged leftist professors, indeed to entire politically engaged disciplines — women’s studies, black studies, gay and lesbian studies, etc. — shows that her objection is not to academic political engagement per se, but merely to Professor MacDonald’s views.

Another agitator, Douglas Kauffman, said: “Our campus is one of the most diverse in the country, and that really flies in the face of having a Nazi as a professor.” Student Shavanda Williams echoed these sentiments, asking: “Why is he here if he has these white supremacist ideas?”

Genuine liberals should find such statements dismaying. After all, “liberal education” is not supposed to mean education by a bunch of dogmatic liberals who all think alike. Liberal education is an education that expands the horizons of students by exposing them to a variety of different viewpoints.

Thus, although it really is not fair to characterize Professor MacDonald as a Nazi or a white supremacist, even if he were, the presence of a faculty member with such unusual viewpoints would make CSLB more intellectually diverse

Of course Kauffman, Cabral, & co. are not liberals. They are left-wing totalitarians. For them, “diversity” is merely a euphemism for the stigmatization and dispossession of whites by Jews and non-whites.

“Diversity” does not mean diversity of opinion. It means black leftists, lesbian leftists, Asian leftists, mestizo leftists, feminist leftists, etc. all working under the tutelage of Jewish leftists to root out every possible form of white racial consciousness.

“Diversity” does not mean that all races and ethnic groups should take pride in themselves and watch out for their interests. No, when whites do that, it is not “diversity,” it is “hate.” And the fanatical persecution of “hate” is what leftists call “tolerance” — and, presumably, “love” (they are all just snarling and sputtering with love).

Before Kevin MacDonald is nailed to the cross of tolerance, I hope we will hear some voices of protest from the genuine liberals — faculty, administrators, and students — at his university and in academia at large. Academia being what it is, we can’t expect anything much better than sincere liberals. But genuine liberalism should be enough to protect Kevin MacDonald’s freedom to think, write, teach, and exercise his political rights as he sees fit.

We will be watching.

Gustavo “Ask a Mexican” Arellano continues his campaign against Kevin MacDonald and the American Third Position: “Long Beach State Professor Kevin MacDonald Helps Mainstream a New White Supremacist Political Party.”

Also joining us this month:

January 16 – Gordon Baum and Sam Dickson
January 23 – Jared Taylor

The creation of the American Third Position Party is creating waves across the blogosphere. We already have two posts about the matter here. Heidi Beirich has a write up over at Hatewatch. GuessedWorker is pointing fingers at the Bilderbergers of White Nationalism. David Duke’s website has picked up the story. The local press in California has three stories about the matter. See also the CoCC and TOQ Online threads.

I’m trying to catch up on all of this. I first remember hearing about the “American Third Position Party” when Kevin MacDonald mentioned it in his RFM interview. I assumed it was an already established third party based in California. I heard nothing further about it until reading the posts here. It is quickly becoming a tempest in a WN teacup.

Personally, I hope this will finally shut up the Neo-Nazi cultists who complain about “intellectual pussies” and “do nothing, contribute nothing keyboard warriors.” In addition to everything else he does, which alone is more than sufficient, Kevin MacDonald is trying to create a viable third party for White Americans. His loudmouth critics haved only talked about it. I have read several of the various criticisms and disagree with most of them.

The American Third Position Party should be given a shot. It appears to be led by decent and reasonable men. If someone else creates something better, we should support their efforts instead, but in the meantime we need a focal point around which to rally our forces.

From Occidental Dissent, January 6, 2010

Gustavo “Ask a Mexican (to Blow Your Leaves)” Arellano: “Notorious Jew-Bashing Long Beach State Professor Joins Notorious Racist Lawyer to Create White-Power Political Party” (be sure to read the comments — and add a few of your own).

Poten & Partners: “Controversial CSULB professor MacDonald is director of new political party”

More from Gustavo “Ask a Mexican (why he is in the United States)” Arellano: “American Third Position Party Treasurer a Fugitive?”

Big Momma Heidi Beirich of the SPLC weighs in: “Dropping Academic Veneer, Cal State Prof Starts his Own Hate Group” (When Jews and liberal academics do this, they are not castigated for “dropping their academic veneer.” They are lauded as “public intellectuals.”)