Posts Tagged ‘propaganda’
A flow of information is constantly streaming from the television set; a bombardment of words and pictures. The speed at which this information is communicated makes it easy for the signal to take control, switching the viewer’s brain to stand-by as information is absorbed without analysis or question. Today the television’s constant signal shapes the [...]
David Halpin gives a presentation on ‘The Zionist agenda, Dr. David Kelly, The propaganda of the BBC’. He talks about the roots of Zionism, the injustices forced upon the peoples of Palestine, the assassination of Dr. David Kelly and the propaganda arm of the government, the BBC. Filmed by BBC5.tv at the Totnes Truth Festival, [...]
Even though the Muslims have far more blood on their hands than the Serbs, look at who the UN tribunal prosecutes. And “genocide” – that’s a Jewish word, and Jews have been practicing genocide for centuries:
I knew something was afoot the moment that the South Korean Corvette, the Cheonan, was sunk mysteriously back in late March of this year. From the very beginning the Zionist Jewish controlled media started right off the hop with stories that the ship had been possibly torpedoed by North Korea. The media from the beginning started to sell the public on this false notion, and with the sudden revelations last week that it definitely was a torpedo that sunk the ship, North Korea was blamed immediately.
SEOUL, South Korea — Relations on the divided Korean peninsula plunged to their lowest point in a decade Tuesday when the North declared it was cutting all ties to Seoul as punishment for blaming the communists for the sinking of a South Korean warship.
The announcement came a day after South Korea took steps that were seen as among the strongest it could take short of military action. Seoul said it would slash trade with the North and deny permission to its cargo ships to pass through South Korean waters. It also resumed a propaganda offensive – including blaring Western music into the North and dropping leaflets by balloon.
North Korea said it was cutting all ties with the South until President Lee Myung-bak leaves office in early 2013, the official Korean Central News Agency said in a dispatch monitored in Seoul late Tuesday.
The North’s Committee for the Peaceful Reunification said it would expel all South Korean government officials working at a joint industrial park in the northern border town of Kaesong, and South Korean ships and airliners would be banned from passing through its territory.
The North’s committee said it would start “all-out counterattacks” against the South’s psychological warfare, and called its moves “the first phase” of punitive measures against Seoul, suggesting more action could follow.
Earlier Tuesday, one Seoul-based monitoring agency reported that North Korea’s leader ordered its 1.2 million-member military to get ready for combat. South Korean officials could not immediately confirm the report, and its military said it had no indication of unusual activity by North Korea’s military. North Korea often issues fiery rhetoric and regularly vows to wage war against South Korea and the U.S.
South Korea wants to bring North Korea before the U.N. Security Council over the sinking, and has U.S. support. U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton was to visit South Korea on Wednesday.
Clinton was in Beijing on Tuesday, wrapping up two days of intense strategic and economic talks with China, which responded coolly to U.S. appeals that it support international action against North Korea over the warship sinking.
The North and South have technically remained at war since the 1950-53 Korean War ended with an armistice rather than a peace treaty.
Tensions have risen since last week, when a team of international investigators concluded that a torpedo from a North Korean submarine tore apart the Cheonan warship on March 26, killing 46 South Korean sailors.
The North flatly denies involvement in the sinking of the Cheonan, one of the South’s worst military disasters since the Korean War, and has warned that retaliation would mean war.
South Korea’s Unification Ministry said it had no immediate comment on the North Korean statement on cutting ties.
However, spokeswoman Lee Jong-joo that although the North was expelling eight South Korean officials from the Kaesong complex, some 800 South Korean company managers and workers will remain. Yonhap news agency said that suggested the North had no intention of completely shutting down the Kaesong park, as South Korea also decided to keep the complex intact.
The U.S. and South Korea are planning two major military exercises off the Korean peninsula in a display of force intended to deter future aggression by North Korea, the White House said. The U.S. has 28,500 troops in South Korea.
In Washington, State Department spokesman P.J. Crowley said it was “odd” that North Korea would sever ties to the South, given the precarious state of the North Korean economy.
“I can’t imagine a step that is less in the long-term interest of the North Korean people than cutting off further ties with South Korea,” he said.
U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon said Monday he expects the Security Council to take action against North Korea, but China – North Korea’s main ally and a veto-wielding council member – has so far done little but urge calm. North Korea is already subject to various U.N.-backed sanctions following earlier nuclear and missile tests.
Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the United Nations, said Tuesday that the U.S. was waiting for Seoul to decide when and how it will bring the issue to the council.
South Korea is not expected to go to the council until after visits to Seoul by Clinton on Wednesday and Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao on Friday, a U.N. diplomat familiar with the issue said Tuesday, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the contacts.
In Beijing, Clinton said she had “very productive and very detailed” discussions with Chinese officials but could not say if any progress had been made in convincing the Chinese to back U.N. action.
“We know this is a shared responsibility, and in the days ahead we will work with the international community and our Chinese colleagues to fashion an effective, appropriate response,” she told reporters.
Her Chinese counterpart in the discussions merely repeated his government’s standard line.
“Relevant parties should calmly and appropriately handle the issue and avoid escalation of the situation,” Chinese State Counselor Dai Bingguo said.
As part of its propaganda offensive, South Korea’s military resumed radio broadcasts airing Western music, news and comparisons between the South and North Korean political and economic situation late Monday, according to the Joint Chiefs of Staff. The military also planned to launch propaganda leaflets by balloon and other methods on Tuesday night to inform North Koreans about the ship sinking.
South Korea also will install dozens of loudspeakers and towering electronic billboards along the heavily armed land border to urge communist soldiers to defect.
On Tuesday, North Korean state media cited the powerful National Defense Commission as saying the North’s soldiers and reservists were bracing to launch a “sacred war” against South Korea.
The North’s military also claimed Tuesday that dozens of South Korean navy ships violated the countries’ disputed western sea border this month and threatened to take “practical” military measures in response.
North Korea put its army on high alert following a November sea battle with South Korea near where the Cheonan went down in March. The Koreas also fought bloody maritime skirmishes in the disputed area in 1999 and 2002.
Relations are at their lowest point since a decade ago, when South Korea began reaching out to the North with unconditional aid as part of reconciliation efforts. Lee has taken a harder line since taking office in 2008, and the South has suspended aid.
Seoul-based North Korea Intellectuals Solidarity said Tuesday that North Korean leader Kim Jong Il last week ordered his military to get ready for combat.
The group, citing unidentified sources in North Korea, said the order was broadcast last Thursday on speakers installed in each house and at major public sites throughout the country.
The bloggers and information obtained freely on the Internet are finally having a serious effect on the Zionist controlled Mainstream media, and even the Zionist Jewish controlled US Government itself. It seems that according to this article from Lew Rockwell, at www.lewrockwell.com, the US government has put up a new article on their own website saying now that there are NO conspiracy theories! Here is the Lew Rockwell article:
Last week I posted a video commercial from the CFR that promotes all of the “wonderful” things it does. Now, the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of International (Dis-)Information Programs website has a whole page called, “Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation.” No, gang, there’s nothing on the page about Weapons of Mass Deception Destruction, the Warren Commission Whitewash Report, or how the “Federal” Reserve causes—not prevents—inflation. The site is referring to “misinformation” that many conspiracy researchers have been dispensing in books, radio and TV shows, blog sites, etc. for the past decades.
By the way, according to this website, I guess Murray Rothbard must have been a “Marxist”:
“Economic conspiracy theories are often based on the false, but popular, idea that powerful individuals are motivated overwhelmingly by their desire for wealth, rather than the wide variety of human motivations we all experience. (This one-dimensional, cartoonish view of human nature is at the heart of Marxist ideology, which once held hundreds of millions under its sway.)”
Similar to what I wrote in the CFR video post, Conspiracy Realists Theorists are obviously starting to ruffle the Banksters’ feathers. Not enough to stop the oncoming NWO/OWG Orwellian nightmare, but enough that the Banksters now have to create websites such as this to try to counter the growing headway that is being made in exposing their true goals.
It seems that the bloggers have won the battle against the Pharmaceutical Industry, and have prevented the mass “inoculation” that these criminals wanted as a result of the Swine Flu scare that wasn’t, and has proven to be a massive lie and hoax!
(Reuters) – The United States still has 71 million doses of H1N1 swine flu vaccine that have not been used, but it is not yet time to throw them out, the federal government said on Monday.
States and other providers should hang on to the vaccine and continue to offer them to people until drug companies can start distributing seasonal vaccine for the coming influenza season in the autumn, said Health and Human Services Department spokesman Bill Hall.
Senator Chuck Grassley, the ranking Republican on the Senate Finance committee, released a letter on Monday that he sent to HHS secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking her how much vaccine was left over and when it would expire.
H1N1 swine flu is still technically causing a pandemic and health officials say anyone who has not been vaccinated should still try, in case it causes a third wave of serious disease.
Health experts consider swine flu likely to join the mix of seasonal flu viruses and it will be included in the seasonal flu vaccine for 2010-2011, which will also contain two other flu strains.
When the H1N1 virus started spreading in April, HHS and its agencies, along with commercial flu vaccine makers, rushed to formulate and make a vaccine.
Influenza vaccines are made using old and unwieldy methods that require incubating the virus in chicken eggs, and the process always takes months.
Vaccine started rolling out in October and the U.S. eventually ordered 229 million doses from its five licensed makers — Novartis, AstraZeneca unit MedImmune, Sanofi Aventis, GlaxoSmithKline and Australian vaccine maker CSL.
Sebelius said last month that 162 million doses were produced and distributed, but only 90 million actually got into people’s arms or noses.
VARYING SHELF LIFE
“Depending on the vaccine manufacturer, the shelf life of the H1N1 vaccines range from 18 weeks to 18 months, with some due to expire on June 30, 2010,” Grassley wrote in his letter to Sebelius.
“I understand that it is not uncommon for some seasonal flu vaccines to be discarded each year, but the H1N1 vaccines were paid for with taxpayer dollars,” he added, asking: “How many doses of vaccine are due to expire on June 30, 2010?”
Hall said the department would respond to Grassley.
“There are approximately 71 million doses, held by states, the distributor or the manufacturers, that remain unused, and have varying expiration dates, some as long as early 2011,” Hall said by e-mail.
“We have asked states to hold on to any vaccine that has not expired, in case we continue to have regional upticks in disease, another wave, or another early start to the flu season. We are holding onto that vaccine (and advising states and vaccinators to hold onto theirs) until there is sufficient seasonal vaccine (which includes coverage for the 2009 H1N1 virus) to replace it.”
The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimates that H1N1 has killed at least 12,000 Americans and put more than 265,000 in hospital. People with chronic diseases such as asthma or diabetes, pregnant women and children were at highest risk.
Grassley also asked Sebelius whether HHS would try to increase distribution of seasonal flu vaccines.
The Iranian government just concluded a deal where they will exchange their 3.5% Uranium refined ore for 20% refined Uranium product through the help of Turkey, and Brazil, as middle-men in a so called “third party” enrichment deal. It has been haled as a major breakthrough, and definitely will ease any notion of Iran “developing Nuclear Weapons” as the evil Israelis, and their trolls in the US Government, keep on trying to push through their BS media to the people. As I have stated many times, Iran is NOT seeking nuclear weapons and is a signor of the NPT and abides by all rules laid out by the IAEA for its peaceful use and development of nuclear fuel for its nuclear power plants.
However, the Zionist Israelis will never give up in their attempts to have the world fight their next war of conquest against the innocent people of Iran. The propaganda machine is still rolling, and from what you will see through this article, from www.israelnationalnews.com, the level of absurdity knows no bounds:
Iran’s recently-concluded war games concentrated on preparations to block the Persian Gulf and wreck Western economies in the event that the United Nations Security Council tries to place harsh sanctions against it.
Forty percent of the world’s oil and gas sails through the Persian Gulf, and an Iranian blockade would cause an inflationary spike in energy prices and a fuel shortage that could cause catastrophe for the West, which is dependent on Iranian crude to fuel their gas-hungry economies.
Public affairs consultant Lenny Ben-David, a former senior Israeli diplomat in Israel’s embassy in Washington, pointed out on Cutting Edge.com Monday that the Islamic Republic stopped, searched or photographed several Western ships durng the eight-day war
The Revolutionary Navy searched a French and an Italian vessel for “environmental” checks, buzzed the U.S. Eisenhower in what American officials called a “close encounter,” and patrolled the Gulf, also known as the Straits of Hormuz, stopping and checking destroyers and cargo ships.
The Iranian Air Force also drove away a U.S. reconnaissance drone that was monitoring Iran’s massive Gulf military exercises that concluded last Thursday.
During and after the war games, Tehran issued daily press releases boasting of new and advanced speed boats, an anti-submarine torpedo and advanced arms for attacking ships.
Ben-David noted, “While the press focuses on the Iranian military exercises, uranium enrichment, and long-range missile development, the navies of dozens of countries have been relatively quietly gravitating toward the Persian Gulf. “
The war games exercises in the Gulf sent a clear signal to the West regarding what may be in store if it succeeds in placing tough sanctions against Iran as a way to try to force it to comply with international rules on the development of its nuclear program.
Iran’s government and semi-official media reported that the Revolutionary Guards tested a new speedboat that can destroy enemy ships, sending a pointed reminder that it is capable of blocking the Gulf. Iran also successfully fired an anti-submarine torpedo durng the war games, Iran’s Press TV reported. “The submarines had managed to enter the waters of the hypothetical enemy and pass the enemy’s linking lines,” it stated.
Iran’s Navy Commander Rear Admiral Habibollah Sayyari said the war games aimed to demonstrate that Iran has full control over shipping activities in the Gulf area.
Armed Forces Commander Major General Ataollah Salehi announced Tuesday that two medium-range cruise missiles were launched from Iran’s southern coast and hit mock targets that were moving on the sea. Iranian news agencies said the missile also can evade radar systems because it flies at a low altitude.
“It’s past the epoch when America would change the regime in a country by just dispatching a warship,” Salehi added. “We have been able to challenge the U.S. not only in the sea but also in all international arenas.”
Israel Aerospace Industries chairman Yair Shamir commented that the cruise missile “is an extremely serious danger.” He noted that the missile was supplied by Ukraine before being upgraded in Iran.
The Air Force also claimed successes. Lieutenant Commander of the Iranian Air Force for Operations General Seyed Mohammad Alawi told Fars News Agency that Phantom warplanes fired new missiles that hit and destroyed their targets. (IsraelNationalNews.com)
NTS Notes: This is absolutely laughable and absolutely absurd. Iran knows that its international commerce and trade depends on the flow of petroleum through the Straits of Hormuz and there is absolutely no way, short of an attack on its own soil, that the Iranian leadership would ever consider closing the straits, and “wreck the Western economies” as this report erroneously claims. Therefore this is nothing more than more Israeli propaganda BS at its smelliest!
The rhetoric and false propaganda machine of the Zionist Jews is still going nonstop, and it is up to us to get the real truth out. This is another one for my Files of Absurdity, and they will keep coming….
More to come
NTS
Living in Canada, I am limited on what I can or cannot say about the Holocaust of World War II. If I was to state that I deny the Holocaust, then I could be arrested and charged with “Holocaust Denial”. And since proper research is disallowed by Zionist Jewish groups that control all facets of the law in this country, I just will not state my position on that subject. I go after subjects that have factual evidence, not those who’s proper research is forbidden by “law”!
Elie Wiesel’s House of Lies Is Crashing
Translated from the German by J M Damon
The original is posted at http://globalfire.tv/nj/10de/juden/die_akte_wiesel.htm
|
|
|
Is Elie Wiesel “The Most Credible Living Witness to Holocaust?”
By Carlo Mattogno
On the 27th of January 2010, the tenth “Holocaust Remembrance Day,” Elie Wiesel was invited to Montecoitorio Hall, the Chamber of the House of Representatives (Lower House) of the Republic of Italy, where he was invited to make a short speech. The president of the Chamber, Gianfranco Fini, introduced him as the “most credible living witness to the horrors of the Holocaust among the survivors of the Nazi concentration camps.” See the stenographic record at:
But: Is Elie Wiesel really a witness? Or is he a charlatan, a faker?
On 3 March 2009 a Hungarian website published an article entitled TITEL MÉG MINDIG KISÉRTI A HALÁTÁBOR (The Extermination Camp Is Still Beguiling.) The article sketches highly significant revelations by Miklos Gruner, a former deportee to Auschwitz, and is posted at
The article was translated into German and English and appeared the following day under the title “Auschwitz Survivor Says Elie Wiesel Is an Impostor.” It is posted at
In May of 1944, when Miklos Gruner was 15, he was deported from Hungary to Auschwitz-Birkenau along with his mother, father, younger brother and older brother. He says that his mother and younger brother were “gassed” immediately after their arrival, and he goes on to relate the following:
His older brother and their father had prisoner numbers tattooed on their arms and were sent to do hard labor in one of the IG Farben factories that produced synthetic fuel, where his father died after six months. His older brother was then sent to Mauthausen, while he, left alone, taken under the protection of two older Jewish Hungarian internees who had been friends of his father. These were the brothers Lazar and Abraham Wiesel.
In the following months, Miklos Gruner and the Wiesel brothers became close friends. Miklos never forgot the number that the Nazis had tattooed on Lazar’s arm: A-7713. Lazar was 31 years old in 1944. As the Red Army was approaching in January 1945 / the inmates were transferred to Buchenwald. During the ten-day transfer, which was accomplished partially on foot, half the prisoners died, including Lazar’s older brother Abraham. On 8 April the US Army liberated Buchenwald, and Miklos and Lazar were among the camp survivors. Since Miklos had tuberculosis, he was sent to a clinic in Switzerland and separated from Lazar. After recuperating, Miklos immigrated to Australia while his older brother, who had also survived the War, settled in Sweden.
Years later, in 1986, Miklos was contacted by someone from the Swedish magazine SYDSVENSKA DAGBLADET in Malmö who invited to meet “an old friend of his” named Elie Wiesel. When Miklos answered that he knew no one by this name, he was told that Elie Wiesel was the person whom Miklos had known in the concentration camps by the name of Lazar Wiesel and who had the tattooed number A-7713 on his arm. Since Miklos remembered this number and was convinced that he was going to meet his old friend, he gladly accepted the invitation to meet in the Stockholm Savoy Hotel on 14 December 1986.
Miklos remembers: “The thought of meeting Lazar made me very happy, but when I faced Elie Wiesel, I was very surprised to see a man whom I did not recognize at all. He did not even speak Hungarian or Yiddish! Instead, he spoke English with a strong French accent. For this reason, our meeting lasted only about ten minutes. As a parting gift he gave me a copy of his book entitled NIGHT, saying he was the author. I accepted the book, with which I was not familiar at the time, but I told everyone present that this was not the person he was claiming to be!” Miklos remembers that during that unusual meeting Elie Wiesel had refused to show him the number tattooed on his arm, saying he “did not like to expose his body.”
He adds that Elie Wiesel once showed his tattoo to an Israeli journalist, who subsequently met Miklos about it. This journalist told Miklos that he was unable to read the number and did not believe it was really a tattoo.
In Miklos’s words: “After that meeting with ‘Elie Wiesel’ I spent 20 years researching his story and I discovered that this man calling himself by that name had never been in a Nazi concentration camp, since his name is not on a single list of inmates.”
Miklos also discovered that the book that “Elie Wiesel” claimed to have written in 1986 had actually been written in Hungarian in 1955. It was published in abbreviated form in Paris under the title “UN DI VELT HOT GESVIGEN” (Yiddish for “And the world kept silent.)” The abbreviated book was then translated into French and English was then published under the titles “LA NUIT” and “NIGHT.”
The person calling himself “Elie Wiesel” has sold ten million copies of this book all over the world – he even received a Nobel Peace Prize for it, whereas the real author, Lazar Wiesel, mysteriously disappeared. This person would never meet with me again. He became very wealthy, receiving 25,000 dollars for 45-minute Holocaust speeches. I informed the FBI in Los Angeles of his theft of Lazar Wiesel’s identity and I filed official complaints in the US and Sweden, but to no avail.
I have received telephone calls warning me that I will be shot if I do not shut my mouth, but I no longer fear death. I have deposited copies of my entire dossier in four different countries; and if I die suddenly they will be made public. The world must know that Elie Wiesel is an imposter, and I am working on an appropriate revelation of this fact. I am in process of publishing the truth in a book entitled “STOLEN IDENTITY A7713.”
Miklos Gruner’s revelations have circulated widely, but not until now have they triggered extensive research efforts. We have now investigated them critically, objectively and unemotionally.
As I have stated in many articles, the Zionist Jewish controlled MSM has been working overtime filling the airwaves with their outlandish lies about Iran and its “threat” to the United States and the world. It is done to brainwash Americans in particular to convince them (falsely) of the need to attack Iran, and end its “nuclear threat” to the entire world. The vilification of Iran seems constant every time you turn on the so called major news networks, such as Fox and CNN.
Now, I want to present a great article from Huda Jawad at www.islamicinsights.com, that points out many of the top media lies that are presented by the BS MSM about Iran. Here is that article:
The Peace Prize President in the White House continues to increase his empty, but angry rhetoric in an attempt to garner enough support for a strike on Iran. The propaganda juggernaut is in full action, and thousands of articles, TV shows, and politicians are beating the drums for a war against Iran. If this sounds eerily familiar, it’s because it is. In 2001, the London Observer ran a series of reports linking Iraq to the September 11 attacks and going as far as to claim there were secret bases in Iraq that produced anthrax as a weapon of mass destruction.
In late 2009, The Times of London published a now admittedly forged document it asserted revealed “a four-year plan [by Iran] to test a neutron initiator.” On the same day, Catherine Phillips, another writer for The Times, quoted Mark Fitzpatrick barefacedly saying, “Is this the smoking gun? That’s the question people should be asking. It looks like the smoking gun. This is smoking uranium.” To the naïve, this would be a shocking use of the media to garner support for a war that is pre-emptive and unjustified. To everyone else, it’s a repeat of 2001 and the pre-Iraq war legacy of the two biggest war criminals of our generation: George Bush and Tony Blair.
Not surprisingly, very few members of the corporate owned media have bothered to ask: does Iran have nuclear weapons? Does Iran even want nuclear weapons? It doesn’t matter. When the media is as prostituted as it is now, the sole aim is to convince the masses that Iran threatens our very existence and must be dealt with in a manner that disregards every single international law and charter. The Times of London is part of the seasoned propagandist Rupert Murdoch publishing empire that owns Fox News, the Sunday Times, and the New York Post. As expected, each and every Murdoch-owned media outlet views Iran from a decidedly pro-Israeli lens and disregards the need for evidence in making claims against a country that has fulfilled every clause of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT or NNPT). You know, the same one Israel refuses to sign.
Below are the top myths the media tells us daily about Iran.
To date, no concrete evidence has been presented about the existence of a nuclear weapons program in Iran. Each and every inspect report by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and the National Intelligence Estimate has confirmed that Iran does not have a nuclear weapons program. Additionally, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Sayyid Ali Khamenei, who has the final word in Iran on such issues, has denounced nuclear weapons as un-Islamic and stated unequivocally that Islam forbids the “production and stock piling of nuclear weapons.” The Iranian fatwa against nuclear weapons is a registered document with the United Nations. Iran has been the only country to lobby for a nuclear-free Middle East. In contrast, Israel has yet to agree to a single IAEA inspection, and its nuclear weapons plant in Dimona is an open secret used to intimidate the Palestinians and neighboring countries.
The world hears incessantly how Iranian president Ahmedinejad threatened to “wipe Israel off the map.” Ironically, not a single translation of this speech has been made to clearly prove he made this statement. In 2005, the newly-elected Ahmedinejad was giving a speech at a conference in Tehran about Zionism. He quoted the founder of the Islamic Revolution, Imam Khomeini, and said, “Imam ghoft een rezhim-e ishghalgar-e qods bayad az safheh-ye ruzgar mahv shavad.” A direct translation of this is: “The Imam [Khomeini] said [the] regime occupying Jerusalem must vanish from the page of time.” The words “wiped off the map” are not to be found in that sentence, and any amateur translator will tell you nagsheh, the Persian term for map, is not found in that sentence. In the speech, Ahmedinejad further stated that just as the Soviet regime had fallen, the Zionist one would too. He did not say Israel was going to be wiped off any map. Obviously when the Soviet regime collapsed, was Russia wiped off the map? In the same infamous speech, Ahmedinejad called for a Middle East where Muslims, Jews, and Christians would live in a real democracy and in liberty.
For the record, Iran has not launched an attack on any nation in the past 300 years, but it has defended itself against assaults by other countries. Compare this track record to that of the biggest war monger in the Middle East, the same one that uses cluster bombs to take out innocent children.
American-style democracy has taken over the Middle East; just ask the Iraqis and Afghans how happy they are post-American liberation of their countries. Operation Iraqi Freedom has only cost 1.3 million Iraqi lives to date. In the last Iranian elections, an overwhelming 85 percent of voters turned out to pick the next president, and practically every pre-election poll showed President Ahmedinejad with a significant lead over his opponents. However, the West continues to claim Iran is not a democratic country despite it being the only Middle Eastern country with transparent elections and a fully functional parliament. Western hypocrisy of this magnitude must be respected, and the West has yet to call its allies (Egypt, Morocco, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia) for throwing political opponents in jail and never holding elections.
By all instances, Iran is a democratic society, but to the United States and its allies, the very existence of a democracy in Iran is a threat. They removed this threat in 1953 when they overthrew the democratically-elected government and put in the totalitarian Shah. Speaking of democracy and sovereignty, the US would know a thing or two about those terms, considering for the past 30 years we have tried to overthrow the Iranian government and laid siege upon siege on the Iranian people. More recently, Congress voted to allocate 120 million dollars for anti-regime media broadcasts into Iran. It doesn’t end there. The US also generously donated 60-75 million dollars to fund and support violent underground extremist groups like Mujahiden-Khalq (MKO), one of the largest terrorist organizations in Iran. Democracy in the Middle East is synonymous with murderous and catastrophic regime change.
Every few months, the United States and Britain try to scare us out of sleeping at night by saying Iran is five years away from a nuclear bomb. Here’s the problem: Iran has been “five years away from a nuclear bomb” for the past four decades, since the Shah began the peaceful nuclear program with US help. Those Iranians don’t seem to be getting any closer to a nuclear weapon, which they don’t seem to want by the way, but that won’t detract the propagandist and war criminals. When the Qom facility was “exposed” by the United States last year, the neocons were quick to hawk it as proof of Iran’s nuclear weapons program. However, they neglected to mention that Iran had openly revealed by it in a voluntary letter to the IAEA days before the US announced it. In addition, the Qom facility is incomplete and non-operational, and if the United States knew about the facility and did not reveal this information, then it too is in direct violation of the NPT. Unless, of course, the facility was not illegal, and thus there was no need to report it.
On April 13, President Obama was asked by a Washington Post reporter if he would “call on Israel to declare its nuclear program and sign the Non-Proliferation Treaty.” The usually eloquent Obama stuttered his way through a response once he finally regained his composure and stated, “And, as far as Israel goes, I’m not going to comment on their program.”
Maybe he should leave Iran’s peaceful program alone and worry about the nuclear warheads Israel and India have.
NTS Notes: Israel wants their puppets in the United States to attack and destroy Iran. It has been their dream of total hegemony over the entire Middle East, and the only countries left that stand in their way are Iran, and Syria. The Zionist Jews do not give a damn if the consequences to attacking Iran would be the deaths of millions of innocent civilians!
It is again time to turn away from the lies of the MSM and spread the truth to others about Iran, and the real threat to that region which is the state of Israel itself.
More to come
NTS
Osama Bin Laden has been dead for over 8 years now, and is buried somewhere in Northern Pakistan or across the border into the Tora Bora Region of Afghanistan. He died of Kidney failure sometime around early December, 2001. That is a fact and has been known by many International news agencies for years.
However, the compliant Zionist controlled MSM in America, and in some countries such as Great Britain, continues with the charade that he is alive and well and living in some cave in Afghanistan. For example: The American public has been played as suckers by these criminals into believing that he is still alive by the constant BS reports and false videos that the MSM puts up once in a while.
Now again, the Zionist controlled MSM comes out with a new report about the dead guy being “alive and well”. Here is the latest lie, put forward thanks to the Telegraph news service out of Great Britain at www.telegraph.co.uk, that a “New Documentary” places Osama Bin Laden as alive and well and living in, and this is no lie, Iran!:
Published: 7:07AM BST 05 May 2010
Far from huddling in a cave in Afghanistan fearing for his life, the al-Qaeda leader has been enjoying the protection of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard with his wife and children since 2003, the film Feathered Cocaine asserts.
The documentary features Alan Parrot, one of the world’s foremost falconers, who claims that bin Laden, an avid falcon hunter, has been taking part in the sport relatively freely in Teheran, Fox News reports.
Mr Parrot, who was once the chief falconer for the Shah of Iran and who has worked for the royal families of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, used his contacts in Iran to talk about bin Laden’s life there.
He took two Icelandic filmmakers, Om Marino Arnarson and Thorkell S. Hardarson, into the secretive world of falconers where some birds can sell for over $1 million, and in which the elite of the Middle East conduct business and politics in remote desert camps.
One contact, said to be a warlord from the country’s north, claims to have met bin Laden on hunting trips six times since 2003.
He said that the terrorist leader was calm, healthy and so comfortable that “he travels with only four bodyguards.”
Mr Parrot told Fox News that the warlord, who supplies the falcon camps bin Laden visits on hunting forays, agreed to talk only because one of Mr Parrot’s men had saved his life.
“This was the repayment,” Mr Parrot said. “He was asked to talk. He wasn’t happy about it.”
The last confirmed meeting between bin Laden and the warlord was in 2008, Mr Parrot said.
“There may have been more since then, but I haven’t talked to my source since we left Iran,” he said.
Parrot’s story is supported in the documentary by former CIA agent Robert Baer, an outspoken critic of US policy in the Middle East on whom the film Syriana is based.
NTS Notes: This article is absolutely laughable! So let me get this straight, and stop me if I am wrong… They dug up Osama Bin Laden’s long decomposed body and transported it over to Iran? I sure like the way that this dead guy gets around…
It seems that the Zionist Jews, in their ever increasing desperation to have their American puppets invade Iran are now showing their absolute insanity by placing the dead guy in Iran itself. Guaranteed that this latest ploy will try to further convince the American public of another reason to attack Iran. I just hope that the American public is by now well aware of the sick antics of the Zionist Jewish criminals to get them to support new wars for Israel.
Such utter nonsense and absolutely absurd. I can hardly wait for this “documentary” so that I myself can have a good laugh. This one is definitely one for my Files Of Absurdity. I can hardly wait for the next BS report on Osama Bin Laden. Guaranteed one will be coming soon!
More to come
NTS
We all know by now that the Zionist state of Israel possesses over 300 nuclear weapons, with a wide variety of delivery systems. These insane Zionists also have incorporated their so called “Samson Option” which states that if the Zionist state is ever in danger of elimination, then their insane leadership would launch a full scale strike using their delivery systems, and would possibly wipe out hundreds of millions of innocent people all over the globe!
|
|||||
 |
|||||
| Report: U.S. in talks to declare Mideast nuclear-free zone | |||||
|
|||||
| By Haaretz Service | |||||
U.S. officials told the Wall Street Journal that the move could be a significant step toward showing that Washington, who is often criticized of overlooking Israel’s reported nuclear arsenal, could be even handed in its attempt to ensure the Middle East is free of nuclear weapons.
“We’ve made a proposal to them [Egypt] that goes beyond what the U.S. has been willing to do before,” senior U.S. officials told the WSJ, adding that they didn’t believe that would happen without first achieving major advances in Arab-Israeli peace talks.
Ellen Tauscher, undersecretary of state for arms control and international security told the WSJ that Washington was “concerned that the conditions are not right unless all members of the region participate, which would be unlikely unless there is a comprehensive peace plan which is accepted,”
Tauscher added that Washington had already discussed the possibility of creating such a nuclear-free zone with the Arab League and other members of the Nonaligned Movement.
Egypt and other Arab states have been demanding that any final declaration that might come out of the month-long UN nuclear nonproliferation conference planned to open on Monday would include the call for the creation of a nuclear-weapon-free zone in the Middle East.
Israel is widely believed to have a sizable nuclear arsenal although it has not acknowledged it.
Egypt is also demanding the convening of an international conference next year with Israel’s participation to discuss that issue. Diplomats have said the United States and Russia are trying to find a way to satisfy Egypt’s demands.
Many NPT signatories would also like the review conference to call for universality of the treaty – meaning that Israel, Pakistan and India should be pressured to sign and get rid of any warheads they have. North Korea withdrew from the NPT in 2003 and tested nuclear devices in 2006 and 2009.
Senior Obama administration officials told the WSJ Saturday that Washington would support a conference such as the one demanded by Egypt at a future date, saying that talks with Egypt on the subject would resume on the sidelines of this month’s UN conference in New York
Using the Nazis to shut-up Whites.
George Caleb Bingham, "Stump Speaking, or, the County Canvass," 1853-54 (detail)
I’m working on a Simple White Advocacy Guide that will help activists in the movement with the basics of persuasion and discourse. Its primary inspiration was the Israel Project’s Global Language Dictionary, but it will include a set of Appendices that will serve to aggregate our community’s tribal knowledge on these topics. For example, those of us who’ve put a lot of time into persuasion and discourse know that West Virginia’s relative lack of crime is good to bring up if the persuadable suggests that Black criminality is caused by Black poverty. That will be included as an item in the “Challenge/Response” appendix.
Chapter 2 of the guide is Six Rules of Discourse. It’s an attempt to boil what people need to know about conversational discourse down to a handful of memorable rules. I’ve pasted the first draft below and would appreciate feedback. Am I missing anything? Are any of the rules tangential? Is there a better way to sum up the rule? If you are thinking of suggesting an additional rule, go for it, but keep in mind that the total number of rules needs to remain as low as possible.
Rule 1: Flip the Table
When cowboys are playing poker in the saloon and they realize that the deck has been stacked against them, they flip the table over. Be a cowboy. The words and phrases people learn to describe racial issues in America are stacked against us, loaded with false assumptions, blatant biases, and the Marxist worldview. If you don’t learn how to hijack the discourse, an intelligent debate opponent can easily redirect you into arguing in favor of the KKK, declaring that you’re “a racist,” and supporting “the continued oppression of minorities.”
When you forfeit the language battle, you’ve lost the debate before you say a word
Don’t take language and terms for granted. Ask the persuadable to define loaded terms. If he declares that he rejects “racism”, ask him to define racism. If he calls them minorities, point out that they outnumber us globally and will outnumber us at home in a couple decades. If he brings up academic terms like “White Privilege”, “institutional discrimination”, or “historical oppression”, then you’re not dealing with a persuadable. Don’t waste your time with him unless there’s an audience to influence.
Rule 2: Focus, Focus, Focus
Our people have a right to exist. We don’t need to fight forgotten wars, defend dead people, or associate ourselves with any historical movements. There’s nothing to gain here and everything to lose. Don’t dwell on the problems other races have, either. Even if Black criminality were cured tomorrow, our people would still have a right to exist as a separate people.
If the persuadable brings up slavery, ask how many centuries have to pass before we move on. If the persuadable brings up the Holocaust, flip the table by declaring that you’re against genocide: every people has a right to exist. If the persuadable brings up hatred or bigotry, ask the persuadable to explain why our desire for a separate peace is “hate.”
Don’t let yourself get sidetracked from the objective of persuading the persuadable to become aware of and supportive of White American interests. The typical person can only be expected to learn and consider a finite amount in one conversation, so it’s important to keep that conversation focused on the core concern: our people have a right to exist. This simple and positive assertion can serve as a seed, growing over time in the persuadable’s mind as he considers whether his people are being allowed to exist as a separate people by today’s political and social environment.
Rule 3: Hone your Tone
Nobody likes to be preached at, but many people enjoy having a conversational exchange of ideas. It’s hard to pretend like you’re not passionate when so much is at stake. It’s hard to pretend like you’re not angry when people are so naive about what’s going on. But when you come at a persuadable with passion or anger, he’s going to become defensive, combative, and unwilling to give your ideas a fair hearing.
Additionally, we’ve been slandered by our opponents as “haters,” so passion and anger — no matter how righteous — will usually be perceived as “hate.” The tone of your voice and your body language should encourage a frank and friendly conversation. Even if the persuadable says something that offends you, smile warmly and explain why the statement was offensive. Don’t cross your arms, furrow your brow, or bug your eyes out in exasperation.
There’s no such thing as objectivity, but most Americans don’t know that. Feign objectivity. Be very careful about statements of fact, particularly sweeping statements, so you establish credibility as an unbiased expert on the subject. Even if you don’t change their mind right away, you may be able to establish enough credibility that they may want your opinion on racial issues in the future.
Rule 4: Listen and Learn
Most people love to talk. Let them. Ask them open-ended questions then find things they said in their answers that can lead to further questions. If you ask the right questions (see Appendix II – Conversation Starters), you can lure a talkative persuadable into changing his own mind while you sit there and listen intently. This is called the Socratic Method, and it can be a very effective way to lure the persuadable into examining the minefield of ridiculous beliefs and assumptions that have been planted in his head.
Rule 5: Know your Audience
Ask the kinds of open-ended questions that help you figure out how knowledgeable a persuadable is and speak at that level. Don’t lay a bunch of heavy information about the Federal Reserve system on your apolitical aunt. It’s imperative that you figure out what your audience’s position is before you attempt to persuade them.
Don’t skip any steps. If you haven’t convinced them that our people exist and have a right to do so, then they won’t really care if another group of people is threatening our existence. If they don’t know that a certain group of people moving into the neighborhood will have a predictable and negative effect, then they won’t really care if those people are moving into the neighborhood.
Some people are deathly afraid of disagreement, and other people are itching for a debate, use an appropriate style for your audience. But know who your audience is. This isn’t always obvious. For example, your cousin is in for Christmas from his freshman year at college and is openly explaining to the extended family that all the jobs went to Asia because Asians are smarter and work harder. In this case, the audience isn’t your cousin. The audience is the extended family. Reply to him but in their language and at their concerns.
Rule 6: Patience and Persistence
People don’t change their worldview that often, and rarely do so right in front of the person who got the ball rolling. The work of advocating for our people isn’t very rewarding work, but it’s important work. The seeds we plant take time to grow and often require some sort of trigger event that causes the persuadable to reconsider his worldview.
Even a failed attempt to persuade may help the persuadable realize that we’re not frothing hatemongers. There may also be some unforeseen event happen in the future which awakens millions in a short period of time. If you’ve established credibility with friends and relatives as a fair and sensible advocate of White interests, they’ll turn to you for answers and guidance at that time.
Most lively discussions contain at least one assertion of fact which is either contested or not entirely accepted. Use that as an opportunity to follow up with the person after a couple days. Even if you were incorrect about the fact, follow up with the correct answer. It will help protect your credibility. If you’ve shown yourself to be sloppy with facts, you’ll be incapable of persuading anybody.
From Occidental Dissent, January 2, 2010
It’s so obvious anymore.
Some photos I once saw in college may have been part of Zionist “Black Propaganda.”
I saw this brilliant post at Palestine Remembered and had to post it here.
Gerald Kaufman, a governing Labour Party British Member of Parliament, declared Thursday that Israel was taking advantage of the guilt many non-Jews feel over the Holocaust to ruthlessly press ahead with its offensive in Gaza.
Kaufman, a frequent critic of Israel who was raised as an Orthodox Jew, sharply criticized Israel in a House of Commons debate on Gaza, saying that “The present Israeli government ruthlessly and cynically exploit the continuing guilt from Gentiles over the slaughter of Jews in the Holocaust as justification for their murder of Palestinians.”
The MP also commented on the claim that large numbers of the Palestinian victims were militants, saying that “I suppose the Jews fighting for their lives in the Warsaw ghetto could have been dismissed as militants,” he said.
Kaufman urged the British government to impose an arms embargo on Israel.
HYUNG-JIN KIM | 05/25/10 03:45 PM |