The Definitive Source For News On Jews

The three main ways I identify Jews are;

1) Physical Appearance

2) Names especially Surnames

3) Their Professions

4) Actions

How to spot a Jew | ENwhiten

The Jew As A Study In Racial Pathology
The British Medical Journal Vol. 1, No. 2109 (Jun. 1, 1901) Dr. Maurice. Fishberg

"While it is undeniable that the majority of deaths in concentration camps were Jews in the list there were also Gypsies, Poles, Italians and Catholics," said Bishop Tadeusz Pieronek, on the site:
Benvenuti su Pontifex.Roma

"It is not allowed to capture this tragedy to make propaganda," added the 75-year-old prelate, who was a friend of Pope John Paul II, saying it "is not historically true that in the concentration camps only Jews who died. "There were many Poles, but the truth is often ignored today," continued Archbishop Pieronek.

For this former secretary and former spokesman for the Polish episcopate, "so we could speak with the same force and set a day of tribute also to the many victims of communism, Catholics and Christians persecuted and so on".

The Holocaust is "used as a weapon of propaganda and to obtain benefits often unjustified," said the bishop.

"They, the Jews enjoyed a good press because they are supported by strong financial resources, enormous power and the unconditional support of the United States and this promotes a certain arrogance that I find unbearable," he added.

"Of course, all this does not negate the shame of the concentration camps and the aberrations of Nazism," he said.

In the article, he also felt that with the "wall" separating Israel and the occupied West Bank, the Israelis commit a colossal injustice against Palestinians who are treated like animals and whose rights ( fundamental) are somewhat violated.

"But little is said of these facts to which international lobbies are accomplices," says Bishop Pieronek, who asks that "we make a remembrance day for them too" (the Palestinians).

The former premier also blamed Jews for hindering progress in US foreign policy. Voicing his disappointment that Barack Obama had not yet ended the war in Afghanistan or closed the US terror detention center at Guantanamo, he explained that "there are forces in the United States which prevent the president from doing some things. One of the forces is the Jewish lobby."

Jews "had always been a problem in European countries. They had to be confined to ghettoes and periodically massacred. But still they remained, they thrived and they held whole governments to ransom," Mahathir said.

"Even after their massacre by the Nazis of Germany, they survived to continue to be a source of even greater problems for the world."

When the former prime minister of one of the most economically advanced Muslim-majority countries, Malaysia, feels free to openly endorse, or at least accept as natural and inevitable, Holocausts against Jews, it is fair to posit that such views are common among the world’s billion or so Muslims.

The world watched and did nothing when Nazis moved against the Jews. History appears to be repeating itself. This startling news is getting very little play, so far. Matahir, who also believes in a 9/11 conspiracy theory, ought to be shamed fort hese words, but somehow I suspect that the "human rights" community will remain silent, as will CAIR and the Muslim lobby.

Why aren’t more American Jews concerned at the brewing second Holocaust? The signs are clear.

Nearly half of western Europeans believe Jews exploit their ‘past persecution’ in order to extort money, a new Israeli report says.

The report, which the Jewish Agency conducted jointly with Israel‘s Information and Diaspora Ministry, found that 42 percent of those polled by the University of Bielefeld in Germany agreed that "Jews exploit the past to extort money," Haaretz reported on Monday.

The countries in which the highest percentage of the population agreed with that statement were Poland and Spain.

There were more anti-Israeli incidents in 2009 than in any year since World War II, according to the annual Jewish Agency report released January 24.

During the first three months of 2009, immediately following Israel’s three-week offensive in the Gaza Strip, there were as many “anti-Semitic” incidents recorded as there had been for the entire year of 2008.

"With the start of the Operation, a wave of acts of anti-Semitism started across the world," the report said, referring to last winter’s Operation Cast Lead, during which over 1,400 Palestinians were killed.

At the press conference in which the report was released, officials also referred to a film that accuses Israel of stealing human organs at the field hospital set up by the Israel Defense Forces in Haiti.

The Jewish Agency is in charge of immigration and the absorption of Jews coming into Israel.

"There is evil in the world, and it doesn’t stop, it’s spreads," the premier said at the opening of an exhibition which includes the original blueprints of the Auschwitz-Birkenau Nazi death camp.

Netanyahu said that "there is a new call to destroy the Jewish state, it’s our problem, but not only our problem."

"This is a crime against the Jews, and a crimes against humanity, and it is a test of humanity," the Israeli PM said adding, that "we shall see in the following weeks whether the international community deals with this evil before it spreads.

The Yad Vasehm collection, "Architecture of Murder," includes 29 plans given to Netanyahu during a visit to Germany last August.

Netanyahu later brandished some of the documents at the United Nations to denounce Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad for calling the Holocaust a lie.

The exhibition in Jerusalem includes four of the colored sketches showing detailed aerial views of the camp and blueprints of its bunks and one of its crematoriums. Tens of thousands of other prisoners, including Polish, Roma and Soviet prisoners of war, also died at Auschwitz-Birkenau, the largest of the Nazi’s concentration camp complexes.

After attending the exhibition’s official opening today, Netanyahu will travel to Poland to take part in a ceremony marking 65 years since the camps’ liberation by the Red Army.

"I guess the point is, it’s better to be a Jewess that engages in degenerate and sick acts, and calls them art, by artificially inseminating herself over and over again, over nine months, and then aborts the fetuses that resulted over and over than to be a White male or a racist. That’s the message I get out of this publicity stunt anyway. It’s interesting that a Yale student can do this and the faculty and administration say nothing, but oh my God, let a Yale student pass out a few flyers calling attention to the fact that the entire media apparatus is in the hands of ethnic Jews, and they’d calling for an inquisition.

If you’d like to contact the student Aliza Shvarts, here’s her email address. Why don’t you ask her who she thinks is worse, a racially conscious White person or a murdering Jewess. aliza.shvarts@yale.edu

Art major Aliza Shvarts ’08 wants to make a statement.

Beginning next Tuesday, Shvarts will be displaying her senior art project, a documentation of a nine-month process during which she artificially inseminated herself "as often as possible" while periodically taking abortifacient drugs to induce miscarriages. Her exhibition will feature video recordings of these forced miscarriages as well as preserved collections of the blood from the process.

The goal in creating the art exhibition, Shvarts said, was to spark conversation and debate on the relationship between art and the human body. But her project has already provoked more than just debate, inciting, for instance, outcry at a forum for fellow senior art majors held last week. And when told about Shvarts’ project, students on both ends of the abortion debate have expressed shock — saying the project does everything from violate moral code to trivialize abortion.

But Shvarts insists her concept was not designed for "shock value." [Sure]

"I hope it inspires some sort of discourse," Shvarts said. "Sure, some people will be upset with the message and will not agree with it, but it’s not the intention of the piece to scandalize anyone." ["Some people" implies not very many, implying it isn't that big of a deal]

The "fabricators," or donors, of the sperm were not paid for their services, but Shvarts required them to periodically take tests for sexually transmitted diseases. She said she was not concerned about any medical effects the forced miscarriages may have had on her body. The abortifacient drugs she took were legal and herbal, she said, and she did not feel the need to consult a doctor about her repeated miscarriages.

Shvarts declined to specify the number of sperm donors she used, as well as the number of times she inseminated herself.

Art major Juan Castillo ’08 said that although he was intrigued by the
creativity and beauty of her senior project, not everyone was as thrilled as he was by the concept and the means by which she attained the result. [Murder is apparently "creative" and "beautiful." Imagine that?]

"I really loved the idea of this project, but a lot other people didn?t," Castillo said. "I think that most people were very resistant to thinking about what the project was really about. [The senior-art-project forum] stopped being a conversation on the work itself."

Although Shvarts said she does not remember the class being quite as hostile as Castillo described, she said she believes it is the nature of her piece to"provoke inquiry."

"I believe strongly that art should be a medium for politics and ideologies, not just a commodity," Shvarts said. "I think that I’m creating a project that lives up to the standard of what art is supposed to be."

The display of Schvarts’ project will feature a large cube suspended from the ceiling of a room in the gallery of Green Hall. Schvarts will wrap hundreds of feet of plastic sheeting around this cube; lined between layers of the sheeting will be the blood from Schvarts’ self-induced miscarriages mixed with Vaseline in order to prevent the blood from drying and to extend the blood throughout the plastic sheeting. [Isn't that special?]

Schvarts will then project recorded videos onto the four sides of the cube. These videos, captured on a VHS camcorder, will show her experiencing miscarriages in her bathrooom tub, she said. Similar videos will be projected onto the walls of the room.

School of Art lecturer Pia Lindman [Also Jewish], Schvarts’ senior-project advisor, could not be reached for comment Wednesday night.

Few people outside of Yale’s undergraduate art department have heard about Shvarts’ exhibition. Members of two campus abortion-activist groups — Choose Life at Yale, a pro-life group, and the Reproductive Rights Action League of Yale, a pro-choice group — said they were not previously aware of Schvarts’ project.

Alice Buttrick ’10, an officer of RALY, said the group was in no way involved with the art exhibition and had no official opinion on the matter.

Sara Rahman [A Muslim, but don't expect anyone to tell you. Muslims aren't nearly as corrupt as are western women.] ’09 said, in her opinion, Shvarts is abusing her constitutional right to do what she chooses with her body.

"[Shvarts' exhibit] turns what is a serious decision for women into an absurdism," Rahman said. "It discounts the gravity of the situation that is abortion."

CLAY member Jonathan Serrato ’09 said he does not think CLAY has an official response to Schvarts’ exhibition. But personally, Serrato said he found the concept of the senior art project "surprising" and unethical. [A wonder why he didn't use the term "shocking?" Possibly because the term "shocking" tends to belong to Jews exclusively. I'm thinking only Jews can be "shocked."].

"I feel that she’s manipulating life for the benefit of her art, and I definitely don’t support it," Serrato said. "I think it’s morally wrong."

Shvarts emphasized that she is not ashamed of her exhibition, and she has become increasingly comfortable discussing her miscarriage experiences with her peers. [It comes as no surprise to me she doesn't feel badly. If you send her an email don't bother telling her what she did is wrong, she'll never "get it," just tell her you know she's Jewish and you intend to point that out to as many people as you possibly can]…."

[YOUTUBE]GxhMmjDlIC0[/YOUTUBE]

The Jewish Auschwitz expert Robert Jan van Pelt wants to demolish the physical remains of Auschwitz Concentration Camp.

The pressure from the Islamic world to duplicate the Rudolf Expert Report and adopt its findings is growing from day to day, and van Pelt wants to hinder official state investigations at all costs.

In an interview with the Canadian newspaper The STAR on 27 December 2009, he urges that all the remains of ruined buildings at Auschwitz-Birkenau be completely demolished and removed.

In his opinion, only the buildings of the Stammlager (original camp) should be preserved.

(In his book AUSCHWITZ 1270 BIS HEUTE (Auschwitz 1270 Until Today) he admits that no gassings took place in the Stammlager.)

Van Pelt wants to put an end to forensic investigations of “Holocaust” at Auschwitz-Birkenau.

He advocates clearing the site even though the ceilings and ruins of the crematories (alleged homicidal gas chambers) are still present and available for investigation.

If homicidal gassings had taken place there, these ruins would exhibit high residues of Prussian Blue (insoluble compounds of Ferro cyanide).

These residues are traces of the deadly poison gas cyanic acid (marketed under the name “Cyclon B”), which was the principal insecticide before the discovery of DDT.

Such residues are simply not present in the alleged “homicidal gas chambers” morgue and crematoria, although they are bountiful in the walls and ceilings of the fumigation chambers where the Germans used Cyclon B to delouse blankets and clothing of inmates and staff.

The most sensational part of the STAR interview is van Pelt’s admission that none of the testimony of Auschwitz witnesses can be scientifically proven or forensically substantiated.

Countless “Holocaust” researchers over many years have been thrown in prison for making this very statement.

In 2009, the inquisitorial German courts sentenced lifetime dissident Horst Mahler, 73, to 13 years’ imprisonment for insisting that there is no empirical evidence to support “Holocaust Industry” claims of mass gassings or attempted genocide of the Jews.

Following are the most important passages from van Pelt’s interview in the STAR.

In the words of the Jewish Auschwitz expert Robert Jan van Pelt, “We have no material or forensic evidence to support eyewitness reports of gassings…

Ninety-nine per cent of what we know we do not actually have the physical evidence to prove [then how do ‘we know’ it!?]…

It has become part of our inherited knowledge.

I don’t think that the Holocaust is an exceptional case in that sense.

We in the future – remembering the Holocaust – will operate in the same way that we remember most things from the past

We will know about it from literature and eyewitness testimony…

We are very successful in remembering the past in that manner.

To put the holocaust in some separate category and to demand that it be there – to demand that we have more material evidence – is actually us [sic] somehow giving in to the Holocaust deniers by providing some sort of special evidence.

It has become part of our inherited knowledge.

(The Canadian STAR 27 December 2009.)

http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/…back-auschwitz

According to van Pelt, the “greatest mass murder in world history” should remain un-investigated!

He thinks we should rely exclusively on testimony of mass gassings by former inmates!

Dear reader, everyone should familiarize himself with these “eyewitnesses.”

Jürgen Graf’s book "AUSCHWITZ: TÄTERGESTÄNDNISSE UND AUGENZEUGEN DES HOLOCAUST" (Auschwitz: Confessions and Eyewitness Accounts of Holocaust) gives us some really eye-opening facts concerning the veracity of this “testimony.”

The witnesses would have us believe that what every normal and ingenuous person would consider lurid and fantastic is nevertheless factual.

In the course of the “Auschwitz Trials” (Record 50/Ks 2/63) in Frankfurt, which dragged on for years, neither exhumed bodies nor forensic investigations of the alleged homicidal gas chambers were presented as evidence, even though the so-called “Court” visited Auschwitz on several occasions to visually inspect the scene of the alleged crimes and interview witnesses.

Having dispensed with forensic evidence, the “Court” complained in its verdict about the lack of such evidence:

“An additional difficulty lay in the fact that the eyewitnesses – understandably – were seldom able to give exact descriptions of the time and place of specific events…”

This “Court” was almost completely lacking in all the evidence and methods of gathering information that are available in normal murder trials to form an accurate picture of events at the time of the alleged murders.

Try to imagine murder trials in which there are no bodies of victims, no autopsy reports, no expert opinions as to cause of death, no time of death, etc.!

There was no forensic evidence pertaining to perpetrators or weapons employed in the monstrous alleged crimes, and the Defense was very seldom allowed to question the witnesses.

(See Auschwitz-Urteil 50/Ks 2/63, page 109)

Think about it, dear reader.

Isn’t this incredible?

In its verdict the alleged Court admitted that van Pelt’s much-vaunted eyewitness testimony was inexact and could not be substantiated.

The following sentence is found on page 109 of the verdict:

“The witnesses, understandably, were seldom able to give exact information as to time and place of specific events…

Examination and validation of testimony was seldom possible.”

Thus the authenticity of the “Auschwitz Holocaust” was “proven” with generalized, imprecise witness testimony and a total lack of forensic evidence.

Anyone who points to the Diploma Chemist Rudolf’s EXPERT REPORT and demands free and open discussions goes to jail for many years, even for life.

And yet, the RUDOLF REPORT stands irrefuted, irrefutable.

In 1993, more than 300 professors of Inorganic Chemistry in the Federal Republic were unable to find a single mistake in Rudolf’s report.

The Swiss forensic expert Professor of Chemistry Dr. Henri Ramuz attested to Rudolf’s scientific competence, and the Director of the Jewish Anne-Frank Association, Hans Westra, admitted on the Belgian TV program PANORAMA on 27 April 1995: “The scientific analyses in the RUDOLF EXPERT REPORT are perfect.”

Dear Friends,

On 23 January Germany’s most feared political thinker, Horst Mahler, will be celebrating his 74th birthday. Herr Mahler has been incarcerated since February 2009 and has thus completed the first year of his 12 year sentence.

Mahler is in good spirits and fine health; he speaks with his wife daily on the phone and is teaching Hegelian philosophy via mail in an attempt to make the thoughts of this great thinker more accessible to the uninitiated.

He does, however, feel that many of his friends and supporters have abandoned him, going about their daily business without consideration for the enormous sacrifice that he has made, namely when considering his age, spending possibly the remainder of his life locked up. Therefore, I would ask you to write him a card or a letter letting him know that he is not forgotten, and that the struggle for free speech continues!

Please be aware that owing to the severity of his "crime" his mail is censored. Only letters sent in envelopes that do not exceed A5 will be given to him. Also, only letters that are free of "thought crime" will be forwarded to the prisoner! You can, of course, write matters of a personal nature- Horst Mahler is a generous and loving person and would be glad to hear from you, especially on his birthday!

Those wishing to support him financially may send him 5-10 Euros in a separate envelope marked: "Verwendungszweck: Sondergeld 1".

His address is:

Horst Mahler
Anton-Saefkow-Allee 22
14772 Brandenburg/Havel
Germany

Thank you very much,
Markus Haverkamp

Here is the actual video of the man calling Bush a Zionist piece of shit:

Alex Jones Jewish Connections

1.) He has a Jewish wife named Kelly Rebeca Nichols.

2.) He has three(3) Jewish children with his wife Kelly Rebecca Nichols.

3.) He and his wife and children are all eligible for Israeli citizenship under Israels Law of Return.

4.) He has at least nineteen(19) Jewish sponsors and advertizers that financially support his radio show and websites.

5.) He has a Jewish lawyer named Elizabeth M. Schurig who is also the lawyer for Holly Lev Bronfman, Edgar Bronfmans sister, meaning that there are only two degrees of separation between Alex Jones and the Bronfman family. The Bronfman family is one of the most powerful Jewish Zionist families in the world.

6.) His flagship radio station, KLBJ AM, in Austin, Texas, is owned by Emmis Communications, a media conglomerate based in Indianapolis, Indiana. The founder, president, CEO, and chairman of Emmis Communications is a dual Israeli citizen Zionist Jew named Jeffrey H. Smulyan.

7.) His radio show is broadcast on Sirius XM satellite radio. The chairman of Sirius XM Radio is a Jew named Eddy W. Hartenstein. The CEO of Sirius XM Radio is a Jew named Mel Karmazin. The President and Chief Content Officer of Sirius XM Radio is a Jew named Scott Greenstein. Of the six(6) executive officers of Sirius XM Radio, five(5) are Jews.
Bonus Videos…Scott comments on Shill Alex Jones

David Charter, Europe Correspondent

The last remaining Polish victims of the transport trains that took millions to Nazi death camps have mounted a claim for compensation after learning that Germany’s state rail company is planning to run again on Polish rails.

Some 7,000 survivors, all pensioners, are calling for Deutsche Bahn to help to pay their medicine and care bills from the profits of the company’s expansion, which was made possible by the deregulation of rail competition across Europe from January 1.

Deutsche Bahn, which is owned by the German Government, is the successor to the wartime Reichsbahn, which charged its coerced passengers for their journeys to concentration camps — including Auschwitz.

The claim is a last effort by the dwindling number of Holocaust survivors to win payments from Germany after the Polish Government formally closed the issue of seeking compensation from Berlin in 2004.

“Deutsche Bahn wants to profit in our country,” said Stanislaw Zalewski, 85, head of the Polish Association of Former Political Prisoners of Hitler’s Prisons and Concentration Camps.

“We want them to hand over a sum for humanitarian aid for former prisoners and forced labourers,” the former inmate of Auschwitz added.

The call for compensation is being supported by Train of Commemoration, a German organisation dedicated to preserving the memory of the three million victims of Nazi deportations.

It estimates that Deutsche Reichsbahn made at least €445 million (£396 million) at today’s value by charging transportees from all over Europe. It said that its research showed that the price was raised for a trip to death camps such Auschwitz: “Deutsche Reichsbahn was a state-owned logistical system of the Nazi regime so every deportation was carried out by them. This is Deutsche Bahn’s heritage and its obligation.”

Deutsche Bahn’s website does not shy away from its predecessor company’s grim history. It states: “Deutsche Reichsbahn was involved directly in the Holocaust because it handled the deportation of numerous people. Without the railway, the systematic murder of the European Jews, Sinti and Roma would not have been possible. Some three million people from almost the whole of Europe were transported to the Nazi extermination camps.”It has so far refused to answer calls for compensation for the deportees, although it said it had supported a foundation set up by German industry to help forced labour victims.

A spokesman said: “Deutsche Bahn AG is not the legal successor of the Deutsche Reichsbahn. Nevertheless, Deutsche Bahn AG is fully aware of its historical responsibility. For that reason, it supports various projects within the ‘Remembrance, Responsibility and Future’ foundation and is also involved in other projects”.

Margot Kleinberger was deported in 1942, at 11, to the Theresienstadt concentration camp. “Without the railway it would not have been possible,” she said. Herbert Shenkman, who was deported as a teenager, added: “This is not just about material compensation, but also the assumption of moral responsibility.”

Sounds like a good way to revitalize our own job market!