diversity, cult of n mass psychosis of, or artificially-induced religious belief in, the essential identicality of all featherless bipeds on the planet earth (see main entry for humanoid), aka equality, universal human equality, egalitarianism (see index of known synonyms, diversity);

Explanatory note: Cult followers of all racial groups are believed to exist.  However, genetically European people make up the great majority.  The editorial staff of the Aryan New World Dictionary propose that this fact is due to malicious exploitation by senior cult leadership of a particular genetic tendency among Europeans. During the evolution process, Europeans developed, more so than the other races, a genetically driven tendency to avoid conflict and help others. This tendency developed due to the need to work with others in order to survive the harsh northern winters; ie, it developed due to unique environmental selective pressures.

As a rule, cult members exhibit moderate to high levels of logical thinking, and may posses a respectable intellect (IQ of 120 or more). However cult followers will ignore/reject/dispute all falsification of cult doctrine. Self-evident fact and even critically important life-saving information becomes unimportant in the minds of cult followers when the false nature of cult doctrine conflicts with the cult-induced subconscious processes of control. Cult followers currently exercise a high degree of control over the public affairs of North America, Western Europe, and Australia.

Exposing cult members to truth can have unexpected results, including extreme irrationally. The cult senior leaders do not believe that the doctrines of the cult are true (note: the senior leadership of the cult appear to have no understanding of or fondness for truth). Cult leaders practice various forms of a religion, the tenets of which are in-group superiority over all other groups; see main entry for Jews. Cult leadership maintains control over cult members primarily through directed propaganda delivered by the controlled mass media; see main article for Propasphere. Second, control of cult members is maintained through the government, financial sector, and mainstream religious organizations; see main entry for ZOG.

scientific racism n part of the abnormal psychology of the cult of diversity relating to prescribed belief in the supposed non-existence of human difference and the evil of uncovering actual difference between human groups; see main entry for diversity, cult and abnormal psychology; also see main entry for magic, pathological belief in, for actual definition see the main entry for science; in common with all categories of racism, an appeal to summon the cult’s sacred god, diversity, after which cult followers may demand that the accused recant of said “racism�, ridicule his belief in science, logic and reason, seek to destroy his home and work life, force/suggest/cajole him into becoming a cult follower (normally by insisting that the accused avow cult doctrines, reject all forms of inequality, make a peace offering by praising Jews and negroes); pert. cult the emotional rejection of scientific data which reinforces a negative racial stereotype of non-Europeans but not Europeans; the emotional rejection of scientific data supporting the existence of any non-visible difference in the average characteristics of racial groups, such as average intelligence, average ability to obey accepted behavioral norms, ability to maintain employment, except differences negatively pertaining to Europeans, such as data indicating that Africans run faster; in mystical diversity, scientific racism is considered the patron demon of Nazism, and is junior only to anti-Semitism in the demonic pantheon.

[Article].

“There are, as of today, still a substantial amount of White people who are of pure blood; i.e. — White on the outside. But that is doing us no good, because very few of us are White on the inside. I am talking about moral purity. Our elites understand this very well, and that’s why they first concentrated on corrupting us with entertainment, pornography and sexual degeneracy (their favorites), destruction of the marriage as an institution, and radical feminism with the resultant destruction of the family unit. This all had to be done before they could proceed to making us lose our racial identity entirely.”

[Article].

[...]

“More than anything else, our future is determined by how we see ourselves. So, to control the future of us as a people, it is only necessary to control how we view ourselves. It follows then that to destroy a people one only needs to get them to feel bad about themselves. There are two weapons used to accomplish this, and they work flawlessly: shame and guilt.”

[Article].

[Article].

[Article].

[Article].

[Article].

[Article].

I’ve only seen one of the essays submitted myself. It is a really good one. I had intended to write a contribution before taking this job. I definitely have an opinion on the subject and will probably write something anyway to contribute to the anthology.

Site Note: The first article from the previous issue of the journal should ready for release tomorrow. Stay tuned.

[Article].

Modernity is completely abnormal – for examples, race-mixing and feminism. Without modernity, women would stay at home to raise kids, instead of abandoning their husbands for their “careers.” Without modernity, Whites wouldn’t marry negroes. Modernity goes against human nature. Therefore, it’s a sickness, an illness, and the West must be cured of it. Right? Maybe looking at modernity in this way (instead of looking at it as an ideology/belief that we don’t agree with) can eventually change some minds? [2]. Perhaps we in the WN community could update our language and our terminology to reflect this “new” way of thinking – or is it really new? Would such an updating be, in reality, just pointless repackaging of older propaganda? What do you think, readers? Is this a topic that could be fleshed out, or is it just nonsense that’s not worth discussing?

[1] imagine a public school teacher being prohibited by the state from teaching due to his “illness,” i.e., a liberal/egalitarian mindset

[2] granted, liberalism may be “hard-wired” into some people

[Article].

[1] see footnote #2 [Here].

[Article]. More: [Here].

More about Hungary, for newbies: [Here].

The study was launched on April 30th, 2010, and is being conducted by David Bugg of SUNY Potsdam and Dianne Dentice of Stephen F. Austin State University. The fact that Roper is urging participation is an endorsement of their credibility. David Bugg is an assistant professor of sociology at SUNY Potsdam, and Diane Dentice is an assistant professor of sociology at the college of liberal and applied arts at Stephen F. Austin. They’ve chosen to use Survey Monkey to post their survey.

All responses are confidential and your identity will remain anonymous. The records of this study will be kept private. In any sort of report they might publish, they will not include any information that will make it possible to identify a subject. Research records will be stored securely and only researchers will have access to the records. It is anticipated that the results of this study will be published in academic journals. Only aggregated information will be used; no names or other identifying information will be used in the publications. The authors claim it can take as long as 30 minutes to complete the survey, but that depends upon the answers provided to the three essay questions. It took me about 10 minutes. Even so, if you still have questions or concerns about this research study, you may contact either David Bugg by email at buggd@potsdam.edu or by phone at 315-267-3481; or Dianne Dentice by e-mail at denticede@sfasu.edu or by phone at 936-468-2241.

Access the survey HERE.

The survey is divided into three parts; a series of 15 multiple choice questions, three essay questions, and 13 questions regarding personal attributes such as sex, age, educational background, occupational background ,etc. I have cross-posted the questions, along with my own responses, to this blog; this begins after the jump:

Section 1 – Multiple Choice. The available responses are Strongly Agree, Somewhat Agree, Somewhat Disagree, Strongly Disagree.

1. I believe that minority people are not as intelligent as Whites.
My Response: Somewhat Agree

2. Ethnic groups such as the Irish and Italians adapted to American culture without massive government aid programs and that is what minorities today should do.
My Response: Strongly Agree

3. I am comfortable with my personal attitude toward minority groups.
My Response: Somewhat Agree

4. Minority groups deserve to be treated fairly.
My Response: Strongly Agree

5. The government pays more attention to minority concerns than they deserve.
My Response: Strongly Agree

6. Minorities get more media attention than is necessary.
My Response: Strongly Agree

7. About all that is necessary to achieve racial equality in the United States has been done.
My Response: Strongly Agree

8. I would rather be a citizen of America than of any other country in the world.
My Response: Somewhat Agree

9. There are some things about America today that make me feel ashamed.
My Response: Somewhat Agree

10. The world would be a better place if people from other countries were more like Americans.
My Response: Somewhat Disagree

11. Generally speaking, America is better than most other countries.
My Response: Somewhat Agree

12. Minority groups in America demand too much.
My Response: Strongly Agree

13. To be a real American, you have to speak English.
My Response: Strongly Agree

14. In my opinion, White immigrants can easily become American.
My Response: Strongly Agree

15. In my opinion minority immigrants can easily become American.
My Response: Somewhat Disagree

Section 2 – Essay Questions. There are no word limits or character limits imposed, so you can provide longer answers than I did. Please be sure of your spelling before answering so as to promote the best possible image of the White Nationalist community.

1. Please explain what does it mean to be ‘White’?
My Response: I use the “David Lane Rule”. It’s based on what he once said, namely “If a man looks, acts, talks, and fights White, then until he proves otherwise, he is our Folk”.

2. How do you define ‘White culture’? Do you think most Whites feel that they have a distinct culture? Why or why not?
My Response: White culture is simply responsible behavior. You consider the effects of your actions upon those around you before taking action. You modify your responses according to your surroundings. You don’t behave as presumptively towards strangers as you can towards those with whom you have a relationship.

3. If you have a religious preference, please describe it. If not, leave this question blank.
My Response: I am an inactive member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I still believe in its doctrine.

Section 3 – The last 13 questions are merely personal questions about yourself; sex, age, employment status, etc., and are not replicated here.

[Article].

[1] some have argued that Serb leaders “switched to nationalism when it looked like communism/socialism was running out of gas,” a charge that can probably only be verified by the Serbs

[Article].